16 Comments
 

Using NOI multiples instead of cap rates can indeed feel more intuitive for some, as it aligns with the way EBITDA multiples are used in corporate finance. However, cap rates are essentially the inverse of NOI multiples, so the two approaches are mathematically equivalent. Here's the breakdown:

  • Cap Rate Formula: GAV = NOI / Cap Rate
  • NOI Multiple Formula: GAV = NOI × Multiple

The choice between the two often comes down to industry norms and personal preference. In real estate, cap rates are more commonly used because they directly reflect the relationship between income and value, while also incorporating market-specific risk and return expectations. Additionally, cap rates are widely understood and standardized in the real estate industry, making them a universal language for valuation.

That said, if you're more comfortable with NOI multiples and can communicate effectively with your team or stakeholders, there's no harm in using them. Just remember to ensure consistency and clarity when discussing valuations.

Sources: Real Estate Private Equity Technical Qs, CAP RATE Interview, Looking for Multifamily model with Loan Sizing Constraints, "Pre-Stabilized" Investments - Multifamily, Real Estate Development Modeling

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Depends on how you think of RE - cap rates are like quoting yields and nobody says AAPL's 5y bonds are trading at a 24x. RE does have an income/yield component and historically that's what institutional core RE has traded on/been used for in portfolios. Widening out to other stuff like hotels, value-add, etc I can see the argument for multiples making more sense, especially as that's where the juicy returns and fees have been in decade of a cap rate compression/multiple expansion regime.

 
Most Helpful

You don’t talk about cap rates as multiples because a cap rate is describing an unlevered yield. For example, a 10M property with a 500k noi is producing a 5% unlevered yield the same way a bond might produce a 5% yield. I would argue that it is counterintuitive to communicate this as a 20x multiple rather than a 5% yield. It sure would make the math easier to do in you head that’s for sure.

 

Veniam sunt rem sequi magni quas. Neque repellendus nisi voluptatum natus iure blanditiis assumenda. Dolore dolores enim quae laudantium. Nam ea veniam dolores unde veniam est.

Enim rerum minima et ea quis et. Aperiam et nam dolor excepturi quas.

Optio expedita est reiciendis. Corrupti a similique quos inventore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”