DCF in Real Estate
What are some of the differences between a DCF in a normal valuation vs. a real estate property valuation? Is the WACC still the discount rate? How does terminal value compare to sale price?
What are some of the differences between a DCF in a normal valuation vs. a real estate property valuation? Is the WACC still the discount rate? How does terminal value compare to sale price?
Career Resources
In real estate, you can model cash flows in a pro forma. You utilize a pro forma like an LBO to calculate the financial performance of a property (Cap Rates, Cash-on-cash return, and ROI).
In terms of terminal value, in real estate you find the Gross Sale Price. Gross Sale Price = (Next year's NOI) / Terminal cap rate (expressed as a percentage) to get the terminal value. The terminal capitalization rate, also known as the exit rate, is used estimate the resale value of a property at the end of the holding period by looking. You find this value with comps (like you would with a multiple).
You also have three appraisal and valuation methods: replacement cost approach (cost of duplicating the property minus depreciation), comparable analysis, hedonic analysis.
What discount rate do you use in your cash flow modeling?
The discount rate would be the IRR you are targeting, which would depend on the firm and the investment strategy, i.e core, core-plus etc.
The concept of WACC applies to real estate, but it far less useful. Here's why...
The traditional corporate model has capital financing decisions independent of project/deal decisions, i.e. they raise equity/sell bonds/take out loans to finance whole company not individual projects usually. Thus one firm level WACC is easy to calculate and meaningful to apply to capital budgeting decisions.
For most real estate "deals", financing is often independently determined with unique property level debt, and even custom LP/pref equity. Thus every deal's WACC could be different, thus having a 'hurdle rate" or WACC to apply is kinda pointless and hard to compare. Thus, most use IRR and just compare to benchmark for deal type/risk profile (i.e. core, value-add, etc.).
So if you think of each real estate deal like a corp M&A or LBO, it will make a lot more sense. That is the better comparison and why real estate is so much structured finance all the time. The exception is firms like REITs that raise debt/equity like most corp firms, they could use a more standardized WACC and would need to in order to figure out if a deal is accretive to value or not.
Eum et quasi eum sed. Excepturi sed vero dolorum voluptatem fugit. Quia ducimus quaerat id error nemo. Ut et laborum vel sit a eveniet vel. Sint optio saepe sit quia.
Sint eos tenetur voluptatem cupiditate. Pariatur impedit amet accusantium voluptatibus et iure ut. Vitae omnis blanditiis ad non sed.
Illum sapiente numquam illum aliquid. Ad inventore autem saepe eaque molestias sunt laudantium minima. Asperiores hic eligendi numquam qui velit dicta molestiae maiores.
Rerum veniam soluta in atque aut. Veniam fuga ducimus consequatur. Iste qui suscipit et possimus sed. Aut occaecati et omnis. Impedit voluptatem et aliquid blanditiis officia facere. Consequatur ratione iusto voluptates et et eum perferendis et. Natus voluptas iure id nulla.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...