5 Comments
 

In real estate, you can model cash flows in a pro forma. You utilize a pro forma like an LBO to calculate the financial performance of a property (Cap Rates, Cash-on-cash return, and ROI).

In terms of terminal value, in real estate you find the Gross Sale Price. Gross Sale Price = (Next year's NOI) / Terminal cap rate (expressed as a percentage) to get the terminal value. The terminal capitalization rate, also known as the exit rate, is used estimate the resale value of a property at the end of the holding period by looking. You find this value with comps (like you would with a multiple).

You also have three appraisal and valuation methods: replacement cost approach (cost of duplicating the property minus depreciation), comparable analysis, hedonic analysis.

 
Most Helpful

The concept of WACC applies to real estate, but it far less useful. Here's why...

The traditional corporate model has capital financing decisions independent of project/deal decisions, i.e. they raise equity/sell bonds/take out loans to finance whole company not individual projects usually. Thus one firm level WACC is easy to calculate and meaningful to apply to capital budgeting decisions.

For most real estate "deals", financing is often independently determined with unique property level debt, and even custom LP/pref equity. Thus every deal's WACC could be different, thus having a 'hurdle rate" or WACC to apply is kinda pointless and hard to compare. Thus, most use IRR and just compare to benchmark for deal type/risk profile (i.e. core, value-add, etc.).

So if you think of each real estate deal like a corp M&A or LBO, it will make a lot more sense. That is the better comparison and why real estate is so much structured finance all the time. The exception is firms like REITs that raise debt/equity like most corp firms, they could use a more standardized WACC and would need to in order to figure out if a deal is accretive to value or not.

 

Illum reprehenderit corporis inventore distinctio commodi. Voluptatum incidunt et rerum et. Pariatur sunt et harum enim error.

Dolores cupiditate quidem consequatur non culpa nam. Sequi beatae qui quaerat saepe. Cum aperiam exercitationem voluptas pariatur reiciendis consequatur perspiciatis.

Iure sunt delectus velit veniam sunt cumque. Reprehenderit ut perferendis aliquid eaque adipisci rem. Sint laborum ducimus fugiat et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”