D/E Placement vs. Investment Sales
** Institutional Brokerage **
I am trying to figure out the best path to start out in. As the title states, I am having to pick between D/E Placement and Investment Sales at a large institutional brokerage. For the purpose of this post, just assume that I would be on a top team in either role…. I know it will be team dependent. Still unsure if my end goal is to go into production at the institutional firm or go into the buy side but would like to use this forum as a pros/cons list for both. What are the exit opportunities for DE Placement and Investnent Sales? What kind of comp should I expect in both roles at an analyst level and as you move up into production? Any insight into switching to buy side vs staying at an institutional shop long term would be greatly beneficial as well. Thanks!
Investment sales > D/E Placement because as a good underwriter in investment sales you'll do all the analysis a debt & equity broker would do, including loan modeling for your 10 year cash flows and IRR models.
You learn good habits on the D/E side, but the xp for investment sales is like mythic.
Thank you! Do you have any insights into what kind of comp to expect in either role?
Is there a greater barrier to entry to one over the other usually?
Pretty similar. I'm not sure when you say "institutional firm" - is it a brokerage or a firm that owns assets?
It honestly depends on what you're most interested in - you can make a good living on both sides.
For D/E, unless it is a niche firm or you are doing 2nd mortgages, preferred equity, etc. - unless you're doing that, you won't be doing 10 year cash flow projections, you'll probably miss out on Argus, and you'll miss out on most stuff that is below the NOI. That is why I say investment sales > D/E.
Investment sales also allow you to be more flexible on your exit later in your career, you can go any buy side role, while D/E locks you up in financing / capital markets even for buy side.
Here's my general comparison [at the junior level] after working as both:
D/E:
IS:
I started in D/E so I'm biased. I second everything above. The one thing I would emphasize is much wider range of asset class and geography experience in D/E vs IS in which you most likely specialize in one asset class or location. It was invaluable experience I wouldnt trade it for anything for the start of my career. I literally learned every asset class, learned how to analyze and model even the most cracked out capital structures, and networking was incredible. Idk if I would have gotten same breath in IS.
Was this at a large brokerage?
How long would you say the learning curve is as an analyst when starting with no industry experience?
Quod molestiae est perferendis sint eius nostrum. Totam est aut nesciunt ea est non. Ad doloremque laudantium perspiciatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...