Deal Structure For First Deals

Hey everyone,

I was curious to know how you structured your first deals that you did on your own or how you would structure deals you do on your own in the future? (This is assuming you have investors and it wasn't all your own money)

Some additional questions for those of you that have done a few deals outside of your 9-5:

  • What product type?
  • What was the equity amount of your first few deals? How did you raise the funds?
  • How did you finance the deal?
  • What was/is the hold time on your deals?
  • Did you charge fees? If so, what fees and how much?

Would love for this to be a discussion so please add anything else relevant to the topic.

33 Comments
 

I focus on multifamily in areas with mostly affordable housing. My first deal was a 3 flat with a rather vanilla investment mortgage. Funds were my life savings at the time. I refinanced that to buy another building once the first one was stabilized.

First deal with partners was when I was still new to real estate and found a 6 flat for $100k total investment. It needed significantly more work than I was used to and I was working in consulting with little time. The deal was structured very simply with me taking 50% interest and two investors taking 25% each. Both myself and the investors divided up the workload (construction management, property management, legal, bookkeeping, etc.).

Financing - none, due to condition of the property it had to be cash.

Hold time: Probably at least 10 years, the building provides a nice income stream.

 
Most Helpful

Going through this process right now at a new shop trying to establish a track record with basically no balance sheet. Tied up the deal (ground up multi, 225 units) with a purchase deposit using personal assets...located an LP willing to fund pre-dev costs during the pre-closing period AND flash their balance sheet/liquidity for non-recourse construction financing in exchange for a fee. Total equity check of approx. $17M. Long term hold with crystallized promote post-stabilization.

Having looked at a few of these (albeit in a short time) it already feels pretty typical to a) give up a fee in exchange for balance sheet strength, b) give up a significant amount of promote (up to 50%) to get a guarantee on the note and/or satisfy bank liquidity requirements.

Our position so far has been to be as aggressive as possible on development fees. This keeps the lights on, but more importantly serves as the future balance sheet that will allow us to tie up more deals in the future (deposit $) so that we don't get overextended.

 

Most of these term sheets are like a 9-10 pref with three promote hurdles up to around a 30-35% above a ballpark 17% IRR. We are putting in 2.5% of the equity check.

In terms of giving up a fee, we are getting charged 1-2 bps on the total equity to the LP in exchange for having them sign on the completion guarantee and use their balance sheet strength to satisfy lender liquidity and asset value requirements. We are also giving up a percentage of all our promote proceeds, really for the same issues.

 

On a long term hold deal that is 10+ years our IRR gets smushed, so there really is no way to hit your promotes in that time period. Crystallization as a concept lets you do an appraisal or valuation of the property at stabilization to do a moment-in-time IRR calc for purposes of determining the promote payouts consistent with the timing of a more typical merchant deal where you would flip out at stabilization.

 

Convertible note

3 yr

7% accruing interest

20% discount

$5m valuation cap

Problem with this structure is having to explain it in layman's terms to non-finance folks and closing deals in a risk-averse environment. Sucky.

"Out the garage is how you end up in charge It's how you end up in penthouses, end up in cars, it's how you Start off a curb servin', end up a boss"
 

Negative. This was an early stage raise for my first business.

@m_1" what was yo first deal?

"Out the garage is how you end up in charge It's how you end up in penthouses, end up in cars, it's how you Start off a curb servin', end up a boss"
 

Great topic, OP.

I’m a passive investor in a 100-unit value add multi family property. Property had about 30 units that were not operating when we purchased it, plus a bunch of low quality tenants that have since been replaced. Purchased about 20 months ago and just about have it to 90% occupied with all units up and running. Knowing what I know now, I probably wouldn’t have agreed to the terms of this deal. But I was eager to get in the game and get some first-hand experience. Anyways, the Sponsor takes 20% of the cash flow off the top, and the remaining cash flow is split pari passu. Original projected IRR was 33% on 10 yr hold. I know we are already getting much higher rents than projected, but we’ve also spent more on capex than projected. No distributions have been made in the first 24 months which was expected. The sponsor on this deal essentially lives at the property when he’s not working his 9-5, and I believe he’s done an excellent job dealing with tenants, upgrading units, etc. On the other hand, he’s spending so much time on the operations side, it’s inhibiting his ability to produce clear/timely/transparent financials. I don’t if I am to the point I don’t trust him yet, but he hasn’t inspired confidence in his ability to aggregate the data and make appropriate distributions, etc. Definitely been a good learning experience, but I will definitely have to reconsider investing in the next deal.

Love to hear others’s experiences, what’s caused you trouble, mistakes you’ve learned from, what’s worked well.

 

Not to completely hijack the thread (since the deal structure is more important to understand)- but, out of sheer curiosity, around what age did everyone start investing in real estate?

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 

For long-term holds, I think a less complicated way (and not currently used often to my knowledge) to structure deals is through a CF split incentive off of Cash-on-Cash hurdles.

Equity funds pari passu, pari passu capital return, then a pari passu CF split up to x% CoC (distributed quarterly or semiannually), 75/25% CF split above to a y% CoC, then 60/40% thereafter.

I would try to avoid getting eaten by pref at all costs on my first deal...

 

Thoughts about this.

If these CoC thresholds ratchet from 8% to 12% to 15%, for example, doesn't that encourage the operator to let a property sit without any improvements as as the returns outweigh invested equity? For a long term buy and hold, an operator may not want to invest in capex if it reduces his promote away from a 15% CoC back to a 8%, for instance.

How do you incentivize the operator being throughout to make sure the property remains in good shape?

Also, if a share were to incur, would you structure in something like the minimum of a 10% IRR or 2.0x EmX at a capital event (for example), then returns are disproportionate to the operator. Thinking it would be smart as an operator to try to get an outsized return if you do happen to sell.

 

Iusto quo accusamus omnis aut. Neque impedit sint aut quis rerum. Ut ut voluptate saepe fuga sed iure. Consequatur delectus distinctio sed nulla exercitationem aut voluptatem aut. Voluptatem ullam dolorem aut suscipit.

Quis et aut et. Doloribus vero est laborum dolores quas. Dolor reiciendis vitae nihil eum aut itaque atque. Quasi qui ullam inventore. Qui illum aspernatur molestiae veritatis at quam quod. Voluptatem enim voluptatem earum eius cum beatae ut.

 

Aspernatur vitae illum numquam omnis non aliquam illo. Temporibus facere officia sunt reprehenderit nulla. Quo neque at molestiae facere. Et corrupti vitae fugiat.

Laboriosam veritatis aut optio. Et veniam consequuntur rerum sunt nihil. Quis voluptatibus molestiae maiores voluptates.

Laudantium fuga in ut provident earum qui aut. At commodi eum incidunt magni ut aperiam dolorum labore.

Deleniti beatae vero qui at ducimus ipsa dolorem nihil. In quis expedita saepe ea quia. Perferendis placeat ad quia debitis fugiat natus expedita et. Modi ex aut porro. Nihil necessitatibus incidunt non temporibus asperiores. Quae voluptatibus quae fuga hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”