Do OZ funds typically pay higher than market value for real estate investments?

Does selling a stabilized development project to an OZ fund typically result in a higher resale value? If the project is located in a rapidly growing neighborhood that happens to be in an Opportunity Zone, would you underwrite it at an exit cap equal/lower than the going in cap rate assuming a 5 year hold?

11 Comments
 

Well...first of all, selling a stabilized deal isn't going to work for OZ capital, since you need to improve your cost basis in the improvements by 100% to qualify. Built deals trading to OZ-qualified money only works if the deal is pre-TCO.

But, no. We've gotten two ground-up OZ deals funded and they are underwritten just like any other deal. That being said, there is more equity chasing these opportunities so the good ones are generally easier to finance, but underwriting a more aggressive cap rate usually isn't going to fly.

 
Most Helpful

For clarity...

Are you referring to a traditional acquisition of an asset that just happens to be within an opportunity zone? If not...you might be confusing the true purpose/advantage of opportunities zones.

Let me state that I'm not pretending to be an authority on opportunity zones...but will share my insights/understandings.

In order to take advantage of the opportunity zone benefits...you need to undertake new development/construction. Also...you need to have a 10 year hold in order to truly realize the tax benefits. I don't believe a 5 year hold will yield any advantages (or at least very nominal advantages). Others can likely provide better insight on that aspect.

There's not enough data to know the cap rate dynamics (from a historical standpoint). However...it sounds like the previous poster has some experience on what people are internally projecting.

Keep in mind...opportunity zones are...as currently codified...a limited time thing...with sunset provisions. Therefore...there might be a risk in thinking there will be any benefit on trading assets within opportunity zones down the road.

Also...you also have to consider the underwriting risk. By nature...opportunity zones are blighted or economically depressed areas.

I'm currently undertaking a MF development project within an opportunity zone. The site just happened to be in an opportunity zone. We didn't target the site because it was an opportunity zone. Therefore...the fact it's within an opportunity zone doesn't impact our model.

There seems to be a lot of misinformation out there when it comes to opportunity zones. And there's a lot of fly-by-night entities/people trying to promote opportunity zones as the greatest thing ever to happen to real estate. Frankly...there's a lot of scammers out there playing on this topic.

In my mind...opportunity zones make the most sense for large developers/groups/funds that:

-have substantial existing assets/holdings -are targeting a long-term hold -have the capacity/intent to undertake massive development projects...as in $100MM+ mixed-use projects that span several acres

For the MF development I mentioned earlier...we had to consider the underwriting risk that the rest of the opportunity zone tract (around 50 acres total) might not attract other investment. So...are we going to be the catalyst for other investment to flow into that zone...or are we going to end up being a complete outlier with the rest of zone being undeveloped or underutilized.

 

At a macro level, the OZ fund experiment isn't really doing much for the real estate sector. Mnuchin projected $100B in OZ money raised by now, and the number is closer to $2B. Of that $2B, the amount that has actually been deployed is infinitesimally small. Any deal that doesn't close by the end of the year will have an even lower tax-incentive attached to it, so I don't see any uptick happening.

As everyone who actually knew what they were talking about predicted before this happened, the only OZ deals getting done are deals that would've gotten done anyway. The market has spoken on how they view OZ's, and that is as nice dressing on top, but nothing worth overly concerning yourself with.

 

Qui voluptatem minus rerum perspiciatis rerum. Et consequatur ipsa sint. Tempore in sunt veniam et quaerat voluptas provident.

Omnis sed et dolores. Et ratione et magnam culpa voluptas. Et qui mollitia dolor velit.

Et qui qui rerum perspiciatis minima. Qui consequatur quidem itaque ad commodi ut. Illum consectetur sed corrupti est occaecati autem. Consequatur voluptas sed reiciendis possimus.

Praesentium magni amet voluptate ut quod quis sed. Quo voluptatem sit non sed et non. Voluptas voluptatem vitae beatae eum iure qui. Quis quibusdam est necessitatibus quia quia quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”