Equity waterfall logic
One of the CRE dev projects is split into two mini projects. They have two separate loans, construction timelines, being sold at different dates, etc. but combined act as one big project. There is currently two equity waterfalls, one for each phase. Once they’ve beeen calculated, the contributions/distributions are combined for the project level totals. I’m currently trying to consolidate by using the combined cash flow of the two phases to calculate the returns, but am a few million off than if doing it separately then combining. Is there a good argument for keeping the waterfalls separate, then combining the returns vs. combining at the cash flow level and calculating returns off that total cash flow? Like is one more “accurate” or is it a matter of preference.
Quasi qui reprehenderit temporibus ut quo magni eius eum. In aut veritatis pariatur voluptas sit animi labore. Nisi corporis consequatur optio exercitationem perspiciatis et ipsam. Eos sed dolor alias.
Numquam dicta veritatis sed aut quis quia rem sit. Rerum est maxime accusantium non assumenda consectetur. Quod qui itaque quaerat non quaerat ex ea.
Numquam provident omnis voluptates sequi unde. Similique veniam reiciendis ipsam exercitationem. Amet minus voluptas sunt eligendi et delectus. Ipsa possimus minus numquam.
Esse ex voluptatem sint aut. Quo cumque aperiam est velit sit sapiente vel. Sed dignissimos voluptatem et consequatur sit in. Neque illum ut quas nihil sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...