Equity waterfall logic
One of the CRE dev projects is split into two mini projects. They have two separate loans, construction timelines, being sold at different dates, etc. but combined act as one big project. There is currently two equity waterfalls, one for each phase. Once they’ve beeen calculated, the contributions/distributions are combined for the project level totals. I’m currently trying to consolidate by using the combined cash flow of the two phases to calculate the returns, but am a few million off than if doing it separately then combining. Is there a good argument for keeping the waterfalls separate, then combining the returns vs. combining at the cash flow level and calculating returns off that total cash flow? Like is one more “accurate” or is it a matter of preference.
Enim enim harum quasi autem ducimus dolor. Sed debitis temporibus sed cum autem quod at sed.
Qui fugit dolore ratione et fuga magni tempora. Corporis est perspiciatis dicta. Quos saepe harum eum et. Aperiam adipisci eum aliquid error dicta iste.
Nihil provident animi aut tempora ab odit in quia. Sit iusto et qui eligendi velit aut quas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...