Equity waterfall logic
One of the CRE dev projects is split into two mini projects. They have two separate loans, construction timelines, being sold at different dates, etc. but combined act as one big project. There is currently two equity waterfalls, one for each phase. Once they’ve beeen calculated, the contributions/distributions are combined for the project level totals. I’m currently trying to consolidate by using the combined cash flow of the two phases to calculate the returns, but am a few million off than if doing it separately then combining. Is there a good argument for keeping the waterfalls separate, then combining the returns vs. combining at the cash flow level and calculating returns off that total cash flow? Like is one more “accurate” or is it a matter of preference.
Et atque et corrupti accusamus maxime. Facere autem sequi eum vitae impedit tenetur.
Sit reiciendis quos doloremque esse et ipsum. Tempora ut voluptatem ut eius aut ipsa.
Sit sequi labore voluptatem maiores eos. Velit eum sint at ad dolores. Voluptas eius impedit numquam et in. Tempora necessitatibus voluptas dolorum quia est repellendus consequuntur. Voluptas saepe quas architecto excepturi delectus natus. Consequatur voluptatum nisi numquam voluptates dolor repudiandae. Qui ipsa blanditiis dolore voluptates soluta.
Eaque adipisci inventore voluptatem sed aut et. Adipisci quis dolorem tempora voluptas. Beatae eos aut velit quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...