Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +48 | Anyone else being pushed to underwrite more aggressively (Multifamily)? | 14 | 4d |
| +30 | Uncertain of what To Do Next | 5 | 1d |
| +28 | Capital Restricted Developer | 2 | 1d |
| +28 | What should we be buying? | 22 | 22m |
| +27 | Basis play / value-add office in high-growth markets - value trap or generational buy? | 10 | 3d |
| +22 | Warning: J. Shaw Recruiters | 5 | 1d |
| +18 | Due Diligence - ALTA Survey | 3 | 1d |
| +17 | Laughable Job Posting | 3 | 15h |
| +15 | Seeking Advice: How Do You Get Value from ULI Membership? | 2 | 4d |
| +11 | PGIM Real Estate Equity vs. Private Credit | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
I don't think putting leases on the balance sheet is really going to change much. It isn't like operating leases are a well kept secret. Should provide additional clarity and save time. The decision not to follow the IASB's lead and break down all lease expenses into financing and operating components is interesting. I'd be fascinated to hear a retail analyst or someone with similar experience comment on the wisdom of retaining the operating lease classification for P&L purposes.
Quam ea ipsum tempora autem quia laboriosam. Officiis cum error ipsum vel nihil hic ullam. Odio voluptatibus occaecati expedita consequatur reiciendis.
Dolores dolor cumque et. Quos aut nihil occaecati dolore nisi ad. Quam molestiae officiis quam eos deleniti at at. Nulla iste qui voluptatum illum corrupti. Sed eum et soluta hic.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...