Help with thinking through promote terms with a potential programmatic JV, especially a catch-up
My company is working through a programmatic JV with a new equity partner, and we're discussing promote terms. It's been a while since I've fully understood the nuances. They are offering slightly worse promote terms (hurdle and promoted interest %) than another prospective investor, but they're offering a 50/50 catchup. Does that make it more attractive than other promote terms without a catchup? If so, is it attractive enough to accept a 1 percentage point higher hurdle rate and a slightly lower promoted interest rate?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key points to consider when evaluating promote terms and the inclusion of a catch-up clause in a programmatic JV:
Promote Terms
Catch-Up Clause
Evaluating the Offer
Decision Factors
Conclusion
In summary, the 50/50 catch-up clause can make the JV terms more attractive, but you need to carefully evaluate the overall impact of the higher hurdle rate and lower promoted interest rate on your potential returns.
Sources: Promote vs Carried Interest vs Catch up, When does the promote split actually occur?, Promote Structure Alternatives, What is meant by a "pure promote"?, Promote from $500k to literally $0 - what do those who have been through a RE downturn recommend?
Et commodi animi est consequuntur. Recusandae incidunt ex autem deleniti ab provident.
Non quaerat enim eos maxime minus harum est cupiditate. At accusamus aut illum assumenda similique omnis. Suscipit et doloribus porro magnam. Dolor quos officia autem vitae ut eos enim sunt.
Cupiditate voluptatem tempora voluptatum dolore vero aliquam ut. Nihil dolore nobis beatae harum. In culpa eum nulla voluptas eius non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...