Help with thinking through promote terms with a potential programmatic JV, especially a catch-up

My company is working through a programmatic JV with a new equity partner, and we're discussing promote terms.  It's been a while since I've fully understood the nuances.  They are offering slightly worse promote terms (hurdle and promoted interest %) than another prospective investor, but they're offering a 50/50 catchup.  Does that make it more attractive than other promote terms without a catchup?  If so, is it attractive enough to accept a 1 percentage point higher hurdle rate and a slightly lower promoted interest rate?

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key points to consider when evaluating promote terms and the inclusion of a catch-up clause in a programmatic JV:

Promote Terms

  • Promoted Interest: This is when you receive a larger share of the equity at the terminal event than you originally contributed. For example, if you contribute 5% of the equity but receive 10% of the returns, you have a 5% promote.
  • Hurdle Rate: This is the return threshold that must be met before the promote kicks in. A higher hurdle rate means the project needs to perform better before you start receiving your promoted interest.

Catch-Up Clause

  • Catch-Up Clause: This clause allows the General Partner (GP) to receive a disproportionate share of the proceeds at a certain stage of the waterfall, after the Limited Partner (LP) has received their preferred return. For example, if the LP has a 12% preferred return, the catch-up clause might allow the GP to receive a larger share of the remaining profits until they "catch up" to a certain level of returns.

Evaluating the Offer

  • 50/50 Catch-Up: This means that after the LP has received their preferred return, the remaining profits are split 50/50 between the GP and LP until the GP has caught up to a specified return level. This can be attractive as it allows the GP to receive a significant portion of the profits earlier in the distribution waterfall.
  • Comparison with Other Terms: If the other prospective investor is offering better promote terms but without a catch-up clause, you need to weigh the benefits of the catch-up clause against the slightly worse promote terms. The catch-up clause can potentially make the deal more attractive as it reduces the risk for the GP and allows for earlier profit realization.

Decision Factors

  • Hurdle Rate: A 1 percentage point higher hurdle rate means the project needs to achieve a higher return before the promote kicks in. This could be a disadvantage if the project is expected to have lower returns.
  • Promoted Interest Rate: A slightly lower promoted interest rate means you will receive a smaller share of the profits once the promote kicks in. This could be a disadvantage if the project is expected to be highly profitable.

Conclusion

  • Attractiveness of the Catch-Up Clause: The 50/50 catch-up clause can make the deal more attractive as it allows the GP to receive a significant portion of the profits earlier. However, you need to consider whether this benefit outweighs the disadvantages of a higher hurdle rate and a lower promoted interest rate.
  • Overall Evaluation: Consider the expected performance of the project and how the different terms will impact your returns. If the project is expected to perform well, the catch-up clause could be beneficial. If the project is expected to have lower returns, the higher hurdle rate and lower promoted interest rate could be a significant disadvantage.

In summary, the 50/50 catch-up clause can make the JV terms more attractive, but you need to carefully evaluate the overall impact of the higher hurdle rate and lower promoted interest rate on your potential returns.

Sources: Promote vs Carried Interest vs Catch up, When does the promote split actually occur?, Promote Structure Alternatives, What is meant by a "pure promote"?, Promote from $500k to literally $0 - what do those who have been through a RE downturn recommend?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Et commodi animi est consequuntur. Recusandae incidunt ex autem deleniti ab provident.

Non quaerat enim eos maxime minus harum est cupiditate. At accusamus aut illum assumenda similique omnis. Suscipit et doloribus porro magnam. Dolor quos officia autem vitae ut eos enim sunt.

Cupiditate voluptatem tempora voluptatum dolore vero aliquam ut. Nihil dolore nobis beatae harum. In culpa eum nulla voluptas eius non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”