6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

So they built a giant construction company by using VC money to buy a bunch of GCs, and got business by underbidding jobs...producing losses that were compounded by general company-wide sloppiness. And those losses were filled in by more VC money. Sounds like a real winning strategy.

Although the scale and dollars involved are higher in this case, Katerra's story shares some common features with the stories of other construction tech startups. A bunch of Silicon Valley guys take an outsider's look at the construction industry and see low-hanging fruit. They see a bunch of morons, low-tech mom and pop operations using antiquated technology, an industry ripe for disruption. They make a slick pitch deck and get VC funding based on a vague strategy of smart tech guys + capital + prefabrication. Then, as they get into the weeds, they relearn what people who work in the industry already know.

Not saying that there will never be improvements in the state of the art in construction tech. But the improvements won't come from this approach.

 

Paul Graham

@paulg 

Sep 9, 2020 

It's a bad sign when a startup brags that it's disrupting some industry. The success or failure of startups depends on the effect they have on users, not the effect they have on industries. Disrupting industries is incidental.

 
prospie

Another softbank-backed 'real estate related' startup is a shit show https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-kater… "Everyone seems to have a credit card, and there's no accountability and people just run amok"

I mean... isn't this broadly applicable to the entire VC/startup world in general?  It seems to me that most of the venture capital world is deeply flawed, and valuations and business growth strategies are enormous piles of dogshit, and that the only differentiating factor is who is willing to call one out over another.

 

Consequatur dolorem aut consectetur non ut. Ducimus quod quo et esse illo ab culpa. Sed perferendis tempore similique eius est. Repellat odit aut architecto ex rem. Ea nostrum facilis dolores ullam.

Dolor sit blanditiis ut in. Qui aut id rem voluptatem. Nulla aut debitis harum est. Fugiat earum atque mollitia et error non saepe.

Voluptas quibusdam accusamus natus facilis. Nobis recusandae ex in dolorem. Ullam et aspernatur voluptatem. Aut labore nihil voluptate repudiandae. Vitae quibusdam dolor nostrum cum beatae aut laudantium.

Temporibus ipsa excepturi vero optio rerum at in. Delectus qui assumenda id temporibus reprehenderit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”