How to value Mobile Home Parks (MHP's)?

I work for a GP doing value-add in traditional MF, industrial, and (formerly) office assets in non-primary markets. Our value-add strategy is pretty standard: capital improvements & mark to market.

I'm curious about a MHP deal since it might be worth breaking into a different niche in the MF space. But I have no idea how to value or scrutinize the deal/product given our lack of experience in this realm.

Can I please get some guidance on how I should be looking at a MHP deal? Some specific questions:

- How does the "leasing" of a MHP differ from that of traditional MF? How are the tenants once they've leased - are they generally very sticky? Do they have a higher rate of delinquency?

- How does OpEx differ? I assume they are minimal across R&M, regular services, property management fees, and even taxes & insurance? Is there a category that's larger than a typical MF property's?

- How capital intensive are they? What are the biggest improvements that would need to be made for a "value-add" MHP? Is a tenant leaving their mobile home behind (say in the case of a death) a large burden (financially or legally) to the MHP owner? 

- Has institutional capital made all vintages/classes of MHP's oversaturated? What is the trend of hype around this product type?

- What are some impactful nuances unique to MHP's? For example, are rent-to-own mobile homes a thing? Or perhaps buying a tenant's mobile home and reselling it?

- What are some general potential legal hurdles you've seen with MHP's? Are delinquent tenants any easier/harder to evict? Once you're able to evict the tenant, do you "reposses" their owned mobile home, or is it still their property and they get to keep it but now you're responsible for hauling it away?

- What is lender appetite currently for MHP's (sub-$10mm)? Is it underwritten similarly to traditional MF?

- Any other noteworthy considerations?

Thanks in advance.

6 Comments
 

How does the "leasing" of a MHP differ from that of traditional MF? How are the tenants once they've leased - are they generally very sticky? Do they have a higher rate of delinquency?

Tenants own their home and lease the land that you own. Unlike MF, tenants have skin in the game and have a much longer length of stay. At institutional-quality MHPs, average length of stay is generally 10+ years.

 How does OpEx differ? I assume they are minimal across R&M, regular services, property management fees, and even taxes & insurance? Is there a category that's larger than a typical MF property's?

Categories are the same, R&M, Utilities, PM, Payroll, Taxes, Insurance, Administrative. Where you'll see a lot of variation is where R&M  is spent. You may not have any structures or amenities to maintain, which leaves underground infrastructure, roads and landscaping as the areas that require ongoing maintenance.

How capital intensive are they? What are the biggest improvements that would need to be made for a "value-add" MHP? Is a tenant leaving their mobile home behind (say in the case of a death) a large burden (financially or legally) to the MHP owner? 

Think about it as curb appeal. You can improve an MHP through 1) home improvements, 2) beautification and 3) construction of amenities.  1) Nicer homes make it more attractive for prospective tenants. This can be done by providing a credit to residents for home improvements (e.g. new paint, siding, etc.), or by purchasing older units, pulling them out, buying a nicer unit and selling that to a new tenant. 2) Beautification - improve your roads, landscaping, just the general look and feel. 3) Amenities - think this one is self explanatory.

Disposing of an MH can be expensive, but if you focus on buying parks that have good home equity, you're far less likely to receive any homes given they have value.

Has institutional capital made all vintages/classes of MHP's oversaturated? What is the trend of hype around this product type?

Not exactly sure what you're asking here. Institutional capital has increased quite dramatically in this space, but for good reason. Fundamentals are about as strong as any CRE sector. While MF rents are slow or declining in many markets, MH market rents continue to increase 5% - 10%+ in core MH markets. Occupancy at an all-time high, still difficult to build new parks (unless you're in TX), housing affordability is increasing generating strong tailwinds for this sector, etc.

Cap rates haven't moved much at the institutional level post-rate hikes, though there haven't been very many trades.

What are some impactful nuances unique to MHP's? For example, are rent-to-own mobile homes a thing? Or perhaps buying a tenant's mobile home and reselling it?

Some operators pursue a rental strategy, but few institutional players do this by choice. Many homes you'll own are decades old and require constant repair. Delinquency is an issue as well.  

As far as buying and reselling, you're unlikely to make any money doing this. The point of this strategy would be to improve home quality -> tenant quality in your community, allowing you to push rent more aggressively.

What are some general potential legal hurdles you've seen with MHP's? Are delinquent tenants any easier/harder to evict? Once you're able to evict the tenant, do you "reposses" their owned mobile home, or is it still their property and they get to keep it but now you're responsible for hauling it away?

Yes, if you evict you take possession of the home. Nuances are very state specific though.

Rent control exists in several locations across the US. Need to understand that dynamic as well.

What is lender appetite currently for MHP's (sub-$10mm)? Is it underwritten similarly to traditional MF? Any other noteworthy considerations?

At that level you're likely looking at regional or local lenders. Think that's too small for agency debt. Feel free to DM me with more questions.

 

I should also add - insurance is tricky. Premiums have skyrocketed, especially in coastal locations. Saw 4x in FL. More importantly though, how you fare in the event of something catastrophic differs greatly compared to MF.

If a storm whips through and destroys all of your homes, you’re in big trouble. Business interruption exists but generally taps out at a year or so of income despite the re-lease period being measured in years. The cost of this coverage largely isn’t worth it given where premiums have gone. And since you don’t own much in the way of physical assets (most of what you own is leases), property coverage pays out quite little. You’re in effect self insuring more than you realize given no insurance product exists in the market that will make you whole in this event.

 

Fascinating comment, I never knew the details of how these operated. I grew up in a Texan single family neighborhood with a ton of MH / trailer park parks nearby. Went to school with a lot of kids who lived in MHs / trailers. I know many of them would have been on the street if not for the abundance of trailer parks in Texas. Really interesting stuff.

 
Most Helpful

I will try to answer this based on the way you laid out your questions.

  • There are two primary operating models.  The first is a traditional multifamily operating model in which the Community rents the homes, commonly known as the Park Owned Home ("POH") model in industry nomenclature.  The other is where the tenant purchases and finances the home themselves and rents the land only, commonly known as the Tenant Owned Home ("TOH") model in industry nomenclature.  The most common and operating model of interest is the TOH model, so I will limit my comments to that.
  • Yes, once the tenant moves in they are very sticky because of the switching costs.  It can cost $10k+ to move a home.  So when your rent is $600 a month, it is unlikely you are going to spend the up front capital (even if you could) to move the home to another community to save $50 a month.  This is reflected in public financials for $SUI where their turnover rate is 1% p.a. versus the more industry norm of 50% p.a. in multifamily.
  • In terms of delinquencies and aged receivables, it's very difficult to common because even within the industry there is a wide (emphasis) spectrum on quality of communities.  So you need to be more specific on what you want to compare to.  But for quality MHC (Manufactured Housing Communities) the delinquency is very low.  On the flip side, for a slum lord controlled Trailer Park, the delinquency and A/R can be very high and a constant management exercise.
  • OPEX is what you think it would be - think multifamily with more common area expense and significantly less repairs, maintenance, and payroll.  The biggest thing to remember is that your nominal rent is significantly lower than multifamily, so your OPEX ratio is comparably - or higher - than multifamily.  A top tier multifamily operator can keep expenses to 30% - 35% whereas MH will land closer to 35% - 40%.
  • Value-add opportunities mainly come in the forms of upgrading common areas and amenities - think repaving roads, re-striping parking, adding a playground, so on and so forth.

I'm going to leave my comments here.  You need to go do some of your own research.  There's plenty of reading material out there and based on your questions you've  done zero leg work.  Go do some work and then come back here and ask very specific questions.

 

Aut sed esse repudiandae quo. Velit et id consectetur. Ad suscipit id odio veniam odio ad. Voluptatem temporibus ut similique consectetur molestias soluta. Necessitatibus quo eum corrupti magnam. Qui soluta voluptas beatae alias modi non saepe.

Facilis in quaerat eius et qui. Repudiandae numquam eum corrupti iusto non consequatur. Ipsum laboriosam eveniet hic tempora aliquam facilis. Tempore id distinctio sequi excepturi. Nesciunt quis quos ut sint consectetur consequatur dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”