[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Hot take alert.
 

Think this pay question in real estate is funny. Most people's views are colored consciously or unconsciously by whatever ideal future they imagine for themselves. A lot of people in real estate want to be entrepreneurs and while they themselves are potentially not getting paid well as a W-2 employee, they don't want the price of talent to increase because they see themselves eventually tapping into this same pool of people. 

Hah.  This is like the argument that poorer Americans don't want taxes to go up on the wealthy because they imagine they'll be there one day, and don't want higher taxes on their hypothetical future selves.  I would also argue that the range of what you do in real estate varies greatly, and that might also have some impact on pay.  As is repeated ad nauseum here, if you work in debt origination or investment sales, you might make hundreds of thousands of dollars really early if you enter the industry at the right time.  You might also have years where you barely pay back your draw.  So it is hard to compare some of these feast-or-famine roles with steadier gigs.  But the average teenager or college student posting on these boards doesn't really care about that, they want to know how to be Jonathan Gray as quickly as possible, without understanding that just won't happen again, or not in the same way.

Moreover, even if you're a project manager in a development role, you might be willing to take a smaller salary if you actually have responsibility.  Yes, your peer in acquisitions at a major fund might be making double what you are, but if you're "the guy" running a couple development deals without someone looking over your shoulder, you might be gaining experience for an eventual move into your own thing - an exit that someone doing acquisitions at a $10b AUM can't really count on, because no one is giving that guy the kind of money to run the kinds of deals he's got experience with.  If I buy Class A, 9 figure trophy office properties in major urban areas as my W-2 job, how am I going to replicate that if I want to start my own fund?  Whereas if I spend my time building multifamily housing for a developer, I have a very reasonable chance of finding someone to finance my project if I can gain site control.  

None of which is to say that any of us should be suckered into the "but it's great experience!" bullshit argument as a substitute for good pay, but there are good reasons why experienced CRE professionals might stay in a role that is underpaying them by 10-15% or whatever if they've found a good stepping stone.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
Most Helpful

I work at a mid sized but reputable fund and make close to $300k with only 5 years of experience. I occasionally leave work early on fridays, I play intramural sports, go on dates, etc on weekdays. We only work the occasional weekend when there’s a big push up to investment committee

What’s the catch? I’m on the west coast. The NYC guys grind like there’s no tomorrow and they 1) put the same amount of equity to work as the west coast team and 2) get paid the same

If you want to have a life, get out of NYC. People there work even if they’re not busy. 

 

I promise you this is not specific to my fund. There are just more chill MDs on the west coast. So go to an “intense” shop like Brookfield, but their west coast office. Get paid the same as NYC and enjoy the 18 hours of sunlight every day

 

This is a legit great post! 

I will say, the UGs, interns, and others on the outside looking in can basically only fully grasp pay and prestige..... actual work quality, excitement, life outside of the office, even real prospects of career progression... are all concepts I don't think people grasp until 25 or maybe even 30! Soooo.. let's rank by pay and prestige!

Will say... getting north of $300k in one's 30s (and certainly 40s) in NYC or even secondary cities doesn't seem that impossible in a lot of institutional/corporate roles that also allow one to have a life. I'd think successfully "climbing the ladder" (to use the worn out phrase) is probably what most who get to that level do, or have some successful professional practice that is "controlled" enough to allow for life balance (like appraisers, consultants, accountants, and even some lawyers and brokers.....). Of course, "deciding" to have a "life" probably has costs vs. those willing to go 80-90 hrs+, but that is part of it right? Accepting say $350k total comp when you could make the run for $750-1M! 

Ironically, it seems like a lot of those who have that set up (be it in NYC or elsewhere), had to do shitty jobs or tracks in their 20s (like made well under the $200k threshold potentially) to be in the comfortable zone in their 30s. I'd note appraisers and bankers (commercial not investment) fit this model quite often. Or as others say, promoted up the proverbial "LifeCo/pension fund/SWF" tracks as an institutional example. Thus, if you hit your 30s and wish you had taken that path, then may be hard to shift without another 10 years of suckiness. But maybe can jump right into based on experience/skills (hard to say, too personal to generalize).   

 

Dang PIMCO has been pinging me for that one, might have to throw my hat in the ring

 

Funny I think everyone has heard about that PIMCO role. I heard hours on their team are intense though. Normally California shops are way more chill but there is always a trade off with comp / life balance. I am not recruiting but I like keeping track of what is going on in the industry. The company I am at is usually 40 hours per week, make 97k base, 20-30% bonus with 1 to 1.5 years of experience. Overall I love my team but wish I made slightly more because it's hard to survive when the government steals a third. My rent is 3k which is just over 50% over my post tax per month income. If I add my gym, car payment, gas, insurance, cable/wifi, groceries, I'm living paycheck to paycheck. 

It's hilarious how when you are in college you think making $120-130k is amazing and then you get older and reality sets in 

 

This sounds like corporate PE but also comp like that is possible in RE. Look at some of the mid 30 MDs at the $1billion+ opportunity funds

 

lol wtf 500k after 10YOE is terrible. MF PE is already close to 400k with 3YOE.

 

wow RE must suck. can literally think of so many seats that exist like that. Anything that is markets facing gives you a life with that sort of income. S&T, any investing AM seat, even a shitty HF seat. 

 

lol you don’t even say how many YOE. SWE on 550k is jokes. Maybe there are a few outliers but those numbers don’t exist in the tech world very much anymore. So many SWE’s get their TC in stock which if you haven’t noticed yet, is doing trash  this year.  so I don’t buy your 550k grad all cash number unless you are including one offs. 

 

25 years old = 3 YOE. No, definitely not the norm, but this website is not the norm either. That's why I'm inviting any finance bro on WSO to step up. Any of the elite boutique dudes or the PE MM guys or some HF analyst at a tiger cub or something. I'm just curious what the heavy hitters look like here - I spend most of my time on Blind these days. And several of my close friends and acquaintances in my social circle hit that number and even exceed, but all of them work for HFT's/Hedge Funds in non-infra, alpha-generating roles (but still in an engineering capacity so they consider themselves SWE's or Quant Dev's). Pay is cold, hard greenbacks, none of that RSU nonsense. 

 

Non aliquid ipsam velit. Possimus vero inventore ut doloremque eaque tempora. Magnam voluptas accusamus sunt. Qui et est consectetur quia et dignissimos.

Qui laborum recusandae minus dolores atque sint id. Debitis tempora et inventore sunt iste similique. Quidem consequatur eos deserunt quod aut sit. Beatae voluptates voluptas est adipisci.

 

Est animi ut est porro. Distinctio placeat incidunt aut ut dignissimos. Iste laboriosam sit in aperiam qui non. Quod reprehenderit voluptatibus aut. Quisquam in beatae nesciunt nemo qui.

A quasi et velit est nisi. Fuga iste voluptatem doloribus veritatis maxime. Soluta repudiandae voluptates nam qui minima. Quia quia fuga adipisci commodi deleniti illo. Hic adipisci sint ab natus quaerat aut quia.

Suscipit nam placeat officiis voluptas magnam. Voluptatem debitis consequatur omnis qui aut temporibus vero. Nobis magnam quam atque repudiandae.

 

Sint rerum omnis voluptatum molestias deserunt. Aut adipisci quia culpa in asperiores. Amet recusandae hic alias error non inventore. Eos qui voluptatum quibusdam nemo laborum quia distinctio. Assumenda neque distinctio provident minima omnis reprehenderit expedita. Laudantium et tempora veniam sit aut aperiam consequuntur.

Temporibus quia est libero laboriosam qui nesciunt. Illum repellat libero non eius dolores. Eum alias delectus voluptate vel. Facere laborum maxime quo saepe quos nihil quasi. Impedit aut error temporibus unde et autem enim ab.

 

Dolor facere atque et vero quia. Repellendus repellendus ea quibusdam maiores repudiandae eligendi nisi quis. Aut assumenda sed quasi. Molestiae libero ut explicabo dolores animi eos voluptatem.

Nemo animi iure doloremque eos. Similique et nobis totam dolores nulla suscipit. Asperiores consequatur animi dignissimos sequi ipsum id ut. Aperiam fugit corrupti id dolor exercitationem culpa. Soluta sunt consectetur sit quidem. Eaque molestias voluptatem et laudantium nesciunt quaerat sint.

Doloremque unde expedita labore aperiam. Eaque non aut et sit. Ut qui sed quia iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”