IS Analyst - Financing Assumptions Help?

Hello everyone,

So I am seeking guidance on how a debt fund would analyze a particular deal. I'm a relatively new analyst at an HFF/Eastdil and am currently working on a land deal which we'll be marketing as a resi condo development. My initial UW consists calculating profit margin and a levered equity multiple by figuring out development cost, condo sellout, and financing costs.

Basically, I am simply trying to understand exactly how a lender (Debt fund in particular, as that is how we're assuming this gets financed) would determine how high they'd be willing to go in proceeds. So for this $10mm deal, the returns look a lot better if we're able to get 70% LTC vs. 65%.

Above all, I want to make sure I understand correctly what it would take for the DF to give that extra $500K in proceeds. From my understanding, I believe the initial back-of-the-envelope analysis would simply to be to calculate the cost of capital by seeing how much higher they'd need to go in spread to achieve the same return. However, I know it's more complex than that, as there are many things to take into consideration from the debt fund side, such as hurdles, their own credit/how much they can lever on their end, etc.

Any help would be appreciated, especially from those with experience in the debt fund space. I know cost-of-capital is a relatively basis concept, but I'm having trouble fully grasping it, as well as the other metrics/intricacies that lenders utilize in their own underwriting.

TL:DR- IS analyst marketing land as a resi condo development. Would like to understand exactly how a potential lender would look at the construction financing, and what they'd need in spread/returns for an extra $500k in proceeds.

5 Comments
 

I would not suggest taking too much time on that. Pricing is largely market-driven and frankly the market is so volatile right now and lenders imo are not being compensated for their risk, although, you have not seen spreads compress in construction lending to the same degree as anything with cash flow.

Can you not talk to your debt team about this? They are in your office and these shops tend to have the best pulse on the market...

 

Thanks for the input. I have spoken to debt producers in my office about it and understand its incredibly market-driven. I guess I'm mostly interested in the intricacies of how debt funds' hurdles, warehouse lines, etc. work and what metrics they use.

I am actually in a hybrid role so am working on plenty of financings, but there are certain things you just don't see from the sell-side. Maybe thats partly b/c I'm still new...

 
Most Helpful

Metrics we use are debt yield and leverage as you would imagine. Difficult to boil down debt analysis into a few words other than risk and reward. Higher we are in basis, credit risk and leverage and the lower we are in debt yield the more yield we want.

In terms of warehouse lines, we are usually putting 75% onto the warehouse line and retaining 25%. If debt yield on the asset is 8% and we are putting 75% on the warehouse line, then debt yield to the warehouse line is 10.66% = 8% / 75%. They usually will advance 75% or up to 80/85 for the right market/product/story.

 

In est tempora id voluptas sit. Quia placeat quas in molestiae dolores incidunt. Quam minima cupiditate omnis vel. Libero quidem ratione autem vitae eveniet autem.

Et molestiae ipsa et atque unde in eius ullam. Quia qui provident aliquid blanditiis hic blanditiis in quisquam. Tempora voluptas inventore sunt in cupiditate est. Voluptas et et soluta vitae omnis cum in incidunt. Nam dolorem ratione incidunt. Deserunt aperiam dolorem enim laudantium. Sequi consequatur velit occaecati maxime.

Qui perferendis aut impedit commodi accusantium voluptate itaque. Dignissimos exercitationem aut in omnis. Asperiores sunt vero rerum quos non velit enim.

Aut repudiandae ut doloribus aut enim suscipit eos. Ab ratione ut accusantium sequi molestiae atque ut. Ullam eos ut est ipsam qui voluptas fugit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”