Hello All,
So I wanted to get some advice on how to evaluate the scale of RE firms based on their relative portfolio size. We always hear RE/PE companies say “we are a $20B firm” or some other number with a B, etc. In your opinion, at what amount what you could consider a firm to be elite, upper tier, middle market, and bottom. Like would a $75B firm be considered elite? Would a $25B firm be considered bottom? Help me understand how to put these numbers in perspective. Thanks in advance.
| +30 | Uncertain of what To Do Next | 5 | 2d |
| +29 | What should we be buying? | 24 | 1h |
| +28 | Capital Restricted Developer | 2 | 2d |
| +27 | Basis play / value-add office in high-growth markets - value trap or generational buy? | 10 | 4d |
| +23 | Warning: J. Shaw Recruiters | 5 | 2d |
| +20 | Laughable Job Posting | 3 | 1d |
| +18 | Due Diligence - ALTA Survey | 3 | 2d |
| +15 | Seeking Advice: How Do You Get Value from ULI Membership? | 2 | 5d |
| +11 | Where are free agents signing? | 1 | 1h |
| +11 | PGIM Real Estate Equity vs. Private Credit | 3 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Link to previous post going through of top 100 in capital raised: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/pere-100-2020
My guy. AUM is relative. Some smaller firms have close ended opportunistic funds that regularly get disposed so their AUM is generally "smaller". But these smaller funds have low head counts and big promote/incentive fees to split to small group of people. Bigger firms have seperate accounts/open end funds/evergreen vehicles that are never sold thus higher AUM, but these vehicles are rarely opportunistic in risk profile. Higher AUM equals higher AM fees but it also take tons of overhead expenses to run these companies.
If your purpose is to compare AUM and use that as a bragging right (yes, that happens all the time in our industry...), compare x firm to the big boys AUM (BX is 370B, AEW 70B, Brookfield 211B) that are all listed on their website. Use the Rhodes Associates comp guide as a ruler - under 2B, 2-5B, 5B+. Not sure if that does any good if you're talking to people in our industry, but it sure does get your bumble date wet (or hard) down there.
Someone in the RE forum is going to come in and say blashphemy for your use of the word "elitism" in here, but I won't. Generally, I consider smaller, but active opportunistic shops or high AUM shops to be "elite", whatever that means...By that I mean, they usually have folks with Ivy education in senior management, if that is "elite" enough.
At the end of the day, who cares how big is the AUM if they pay you big USD...Hope that helps.
Thank you! Definitely helps.
It's not the size of your fund, it's how you use it......
That's what she said
AUM is not a consistent term in RE. Owner / operators will use total asset value. PE funds will use total capital commitments (aka only the equity in their deals). Some owner-operators will include their property managed assets. Some giants have large open ended funds that never sell, some are constantly selling and raising new capital so their aum doesn’t grow as much.
AUM is not a great way to group companies
Using property management as AUM is such a weak move. Know any specific companies that do this?
Nah it’s usually footnoted tho
So, there is an old adage in real estate that essentially says "it's not what you own, it's what you control".... and thus the secret is OPM = Other People's Money....
So what are you measuring...
Equity investments
Debt Investments
Total Investments (Equity + Debt)
Gross Assets
Net Assets (i.e. Value - Debt)
Market Capitalization (like with a REIT)
Assets Under Management (direct funds? Discretionary funds?) - What about Separately Managed Accounts, where do they fall??
or how about
Gross Leasable Sq. Footage
Number of Properties
Acres of Land, etc.
Total sq. feet developed
The point is, good luck trying to make this meaningful. Size is not a great metric of comparison. To that end, the IREI 150 list is about as "definitive" as I am willing to represent (with the PERE 100 being decent for measuring private equity fund raising activity). Still, I don't really respect a "Top 10" more than a "Bottom 50" firm, or would want to work for one vs. the other based on that at all. I wouldn't choose which to work for, invest in, or do deals by that metric (and neither would most of the real world).
So, what's the use of using some "tier" system if won't solve any problems..... (like who will pay you the most...)
"elite" lmao
Aut id iure dicta voluptatibus qui. Praesentium veritatis nesciunt at dignissimos distinctio non enim quo. Accusantium quos aut aut consequatur non consequuntur voluptatem. Magnam quisquam optio voluptate cum. Autem quos deleniti dolore possimus quia minus fugiat incidunt.
Sequi autem sed ipsum. Et pariatur porro et cum. Non enim qui tempore dolor voluptas numquam autem veritatis.
Et eligendi consequuntur sed magnam. Quidem laborum suscipit sit reprehenderit. Velit quod omnis iusto quisquam quas error eos. Incidunt est possimus corporis nisi quae consequatur. Modi accusamus aut consequatur autem illum. Ut ea vero consequatur dolor quis facilis. Tenetur fuga dolores eaque aliquid aperiam maiores.
Dolor nam ut a. Praesentium id qui dolore molestias vitae voluptatibus. Placeat quam ipsum voluptas distinctio. Repudiandae id eum non quae omnis facere et. Voluptatum deleniti repudiandae non vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...