Judging Companies By Their Size

Hello All,


So I wanted to get some advice on how to evaluate the scale of RE firms based on their relative portfolio size. We always hear RE/PE companies say “we are a $20B firm” or some other number with a B, etc. In your opinion, at what amount what you could consider a firm to be elite, upper tier, middle market, and bottom. Like would a $75B firm be considered elite? Would a $25B firm be considered bottom? Help me understand how to put these numbers in perspective. Thanks in advance. 

11 Comments
 

My guy. AUM is relative. Some smaller firms have close ended opportunistic funds that regularly get disposed so their AUM is generally "smaller". But these smaller funds have low head counts and big promote/incentive fees to split to small group of people. Bigger firms have seperate accounts/open end funds/evergreen vehicles that are never sold thus higher AUM, but these vehicles are rarely opportunistic in risk profile. Higher AUM equals higher AM fees but it also take tons of overhead expenses to run these companies.

If your purpose is to compare AUM and use that as a bragging right (yes, that happens all the time in our industry...), compare x firm to the big boys AUM (BX is 370B, AEW 70B, Brookfield 211B) that are all listed on their website. Use the Rhodes Associates comp guide as a ruler - under 2B, 2-5B, 5B+. Not sure if that does any good if you're talking to people in our industry, but it sure does get your bumble date wet (or hard) down there.

Someone in the RE forum is going to come in and say blashphemy for your use of the word "elitism" in here, but I won't. Generally, I consider smaller, but active opportunistic shops or high AUM shops to be "elite", whatever that means...By that I mean, they usually have folks with Ivy education in senior management, if that is "elite" enough.

At the end of the day, who cares how big is the AUM if they pay you big USD...Hope that helps.

 

AUM is not a consistent term in RE. Owner / operators will use total asset value. PE funds will use total capital commitments (aka only the equity in their deals). Some owner-operators will include their property managed assets. Some giants have large open ended funds that never sell, some are constantly selling and raising new capital so their aum doesn’t grow as much.

AUM is not a great way to group companies 

 
Most Helpful

So, there is an old adage in real estate that essentially says "it's not what you own, it's what you control".... and thus the secret is OPM = Other People's Money....

So what are you measuring...

Equity investments

Debt Investments

Total Investments (Equity + Debt)

Gross Assets

Net Assets (i.e. Value - Debt)

Market Capitalization (like with a REIT)

Assets Under Management (direct funds? Discretionary funds?) - What about Separately Managed Accounts, where do they fall??

or how about

Gross Leasable Sq. Footage

Number of Properties 

Acres of Land, etc.

Total sq. feet developed

The point is, good luck trying to make this meaningful. Size is not a great metric of comparison. To that end, the IREI 150 list is about as "definitive" as I am willing to represent (with the PERE 100 being decent for measuring private equity fund raising activity). Still, I don't really respect a "Top 10" more than a "Bottom 50" firm, or would want to work for one vs. the other based on that at all. I wouldn't choose which to work for, invest in, or do deals by that metric (and neither would most of the real world).

So, what's the use of using some "tier" system if won't solve any problems..... (like who will pay you the most...)

 

Est quis voluptate ea qui ex ad ratione et. Eos iure ut accusantium quia suscipit. Occaecati minima debitis voluptatem.

Tempora voluptate eveniet voluptas consequatur fuga. Eaque molestias vel ea tenetur. Nemo officiis exercitationem ut rerum. Error dolor ut autem aut tenetur. Quia perspiciatis porro modi sint rerum ut autem accusantium.

Corporis et dicta officiis eum nobis iste. Rem libero iusto ducimus autem.

Sit animi laudantium sed dolor consequatur in quis. Ducimus reprehenderit tempora omnis ab et qui. Quae qui quia aut dolore vitae ut quae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”