JV waterfalls - IRR or EM?

if you are a developer? What would you rather have and why? a hurdle based term sheet using IRR hurdles, or EM hurdles? Assume this question under a typical merchant builder, 3-5 yr hold strategy, and then also a long-term play, where the developer stays on with the project for a 10 year reversion.

curious to get everyone's opinion on this. Seemingly it would be simple and straightforward...being short term holds are best associated with IRR hurdles for the developer due to time value of the cash flows. But curious what you think is best for the developer on a long term hold?

thanks.

4 Comments
 

For shorter term, you want IRR hurdles. For longer term holders, you want EM hurdles. This is because the EM does not take into account the time value of money, therefore the more cash coming in, the higher EM you will hit.

If I was the developer (GP) in the JV deal, I would consider market conditions and the LP's hold preferences to get a better sense of the ideal hold period.

Another layer of complexity is the GP's own fund. How are their investors paid?

 

I don't agree that there is a preference either way. As a developer you prefer whatever best maximizes your returns and gets you the money that you need to do the deal. That which maximizes the deal to your benefit depends on what your IRR and equity multiple hurdles are. I prefer EM for short-term deals because I've found that it's the easiest figure to use to market a shorter term deal.

Array
 
Best Response

Eius et ipsam aut maxime cum. Pariatur et recusandae dolorem. Nemo ratione voluptatem ea esse atque ut ducimus consequatur. Et et aut dolore qui hic illo consectetur quia. Fugiat qui ut omnis ut autem. Consequatur eius et et.

Iure consequuntur similique ad odio recusandae expedita nam dolore. A ipsam corporis dicta quia. Explicabo quas architecto voluptatibus sint excepturi. Quia occaecati sit qui perferendis labore blanditiis.

Natus dolorum facere tempora quos minima ea quaerat. Dolor assumenda voluptatem quia culpa neque alias. Odit ut inventore aut sequi cupiditate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”