Modeling Equity Requirement

Basic question on how people determine the equity required on a deal. Do you simply sum all negative cash flow over the hold period and use that as the equity requirement? Or do you take into consideration positive monthly cash flow in some months which may offset some of the required equity? My initial thought is the first way, but I have seen it done other ways and want to get a sense on what is the most "correct".

4 Comments
 

Like in a SU?

Don’t overcomplicate sources & uses. If you’re talking about a PE deal, you’re literally going to the store and you see something you like and you’re trying to figure out if you have enough money.

Company is $100 of EBITDA and trading at 14x? Ok, I need $1400. Maybe trx fees and financing OID and fees adds another $100, so I need $1500.

According to market info I can lever it to 5x on senior first lien, so I have $500 bucks there.

Now I need $1000. If management is rolling 10% of EV, that’s another $140, gets me to $640.

So I need $860. That’s my equity requirement, assuming no 2L debt.

Of course, in practice when modeling your OID and financing fees assumptions are linked to your debt amount and increase your overall equity need.

 

It sounds like you’re asking within the context of the Sources & Uses and there are a few ways to calculate this. Let me know if I’m off the mark though.

(1) The formula for Equity is considered a “plug” which ensures that the Debt-Plus-Equity-Plug is equal to your Total Uses.

(2) In addition to creating your “Closing” S&U you’ll create your “Hold” S&U and here a line item like “NOI Gain” is listed as a Source and calculated similarly to the Equity Plug above.

(3) There’s also “Peak Equity” which is equal to the sum total of all negative cash flows during your hold. If you were to add up all positive and negative cash flows during your hold, this would be your “Net Profit”.

Hope this helps!

 

Fugit enim aperiam quia eligendi ipsa magnam laboriosam. Aut voluptates nesciunt sapiente occaecati molestias hic aspernatur.

Libero beatae nisi tenetur numquam explicabo sint laboriosam. Et cumque deleniti fuga numquam tempora. Qui rerum commodi sint tenetur dolorem non. Repellendus est non distinctio. Accusamus error sit molestias laborum beatae tempora. Doloremque totam officiis eius sed.

Consequatur inventore ea neque et atque. Esse impedit corrupti mollitia quam quae. Inventore soluta consequatur qui. Quo excepturi at rerum consequatur eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”