Modeling NNN vs FS/Gross Deals

Do you guys ever model both NNN and FS rent structures to see what the comparative impact is on returns (primarily IRRs), holding all other variables constant? The levered returns on my FS structure are much higher than the NNN equivalent--like 200 bps. I expected to see a smaller bump due to annual rent escalators on a higher all-in rent yielding some larger incremental rents (ie, escalating 2.50% on $50 FS will give you more incremental rent than 2.50% on $35 NNN), but 200 seems like a lot. All I'm really doing is adjusting the rents and reimbursables...seems way off.

13 Comments
 
Best Response

When you mean FS, are tenants paying expenses over a base year, or is the lease an absolute full service gross (tenant only writes 1 check for base rent, which factors in expenses)? What annual expenses are you assuming?

Your scenario could be right. For example, my company was going to sign a lease with a governmental agency that did not want to deal with unknown future expenses. They wanted to write one check, and pay a set x% increases year over year. Because they wanted to structure the lease this way, we baked a higher starting rent for us to take the expense increase burden. So, when we are underwriting / comparing day one, the IRR looked Accretive in what we were offering vs. tenant paying expenses over a base year. However, if for whatever reason operating expenses jumped down the road 5 years or so, this scenario could return a lower IRR / multiple vs. structuring the lease with the tenant paying expenses over a BY.

 

Cool, thanks for the feedback. I'm assuming the FS deals have a base year, so the expense reimbursement revenues are actually pretty similar in both models. The bucket of expenses (OPEX/tax/mngt fees) is like $16.50 PSF, so reimbursement rev is incremental increase over that number. I just found it hard to believe the escalator on a higher all-in rent could be that Accretive.

 

Commodi fugiat velit delectus eveniet soluta recusandae minima. Sapiente ut dolores minus unde qui et.

Aut reiciendis aut enim et voluptas quis. Autem labore quibusdam aliquid molestiae ipsa et quisquam suscipit. Asperiores nam voluptas consequuntur mollitia nostrum.

Quasi nihil dolorum est ea ab saepe dolores neque. Modi sed dolorem et amet nesciunt quidem commodi. Veritatis sequi sapiente rerum aut et. Et reiciendis excepturi quia quo. Est molestiae qui nobis est aut. Aspernatur rem voluptate laudantium reprehenderit et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”