Modeling NNN vs FS/Gross Deals

Do you guys ever model both NNN and FS rent structures to see what the comparative impact is on returns (primarily IRRs), holding all other variables constant? The levered returns on my FS structure are much higher than the NNN equivalent--like 200 bps. I expected to see a smaller bump due to annual rent escalators on a higher all-in rent yielding some larger incremental rents (ie, escalating 2.50% on $50 FS will give you more incremental rent than 2.50% on $35 NNN), but 200 seems like a lot. All I'm really doing is adjusting the rents and reimbursables...seems way off.

13 Comments
 
Best Response

When you mean FS, are tenants paying expenses over a base year, or is the lease an absolute full service gross (tenant only writes 1 check for base rent, which factors in expenses)? What annual expenses are you assuming?

Your scenario could be right. For example, my company was going to sign a lease with a governmental agency that did not want to deal with unknown future expenses. They wanted to write one check, and pay a set x% increases year over year. Because they wanted to structure the lease this way, we baked a higher starting rent for us to take the expense increase burden. So, when we are underwriting / comparing day one, the IRR looked Accretive in what we were offering vs. tenant paying expenses over a base year. However, if for whatever reason operating expenses jumped down the road 5 years or so, this scenario could return a lower IRR / multiple vs. structuring the lease with the tenant paying expenses over a BY.

 

Cool, thanks for the feedback. I'm assuming the FS deals have a base year, so the expense reimbursement revenues are actually pretty similar in both models. The bucket of expenses (OPEX/tax/mngt fees) is like $16.50 PSF, so reimbursement rev is incremental increase over that number. I just found it hard to believe the escalator on a higher all-in rent could be that Accretive.

 

Alias dignissimos pariatur eum quia architecto laboriosam. Quo nulla magnam quis enim qui cupiditate aspernatur molestias. Non sapiente quae ratione quis at sunt est. Eos commodi aut enim et rerum necessitatibus. Magni consequuntur corporis doloremque pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”