Multifamily Value Add Financing

I am currently a junior and will be interning at a sponsor focused on value-add, multifamily executions. When sourcing debt financing for this type of execution, is the loan based on LTV or LTC (inclusive of renovation costs). If LTV, are you able to get a much higher LTV that leads to a fair implied LTC. Are these loans generally fixed or floating? When you all are underwriting a multifamily value-add deal, what assumptions do you typically make on the debt. Also, if the property has a high occupancy, does the overall project budget need to include an interest reserve. Do you usually refi upon stabilization with a fixed rate, 10 year loan?

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You're trying to generalize something that is highly situational.

This all depends on the current lending environment. When rates are low and the money is flowing, then an acquisition loan is frequently based on LTV and then you may be able to get an additional revolving facility to fund future capex for your value-add initiatives (or for commercial properties, good news funding to fund TI/LCs for big spaces).

In an environment like today, your loan size is 100% going to be determined by DSCR. Generally speaking,1.25x is the standard for a relatively strong borrower. You might still be able to get the revolver/good news funding if you're a really strong borrower, but wouldn't count on it as your base case.

This is all high level from someone with minimal exposure to value add. I'd imagine with a substantial value add execution that goes beyond your typical "slap $40-50k into each unit to redo the kitchen, bathroom and floors", then you might be able to get an LTC-based construction loan (would still be DSCR based on potential stabilized NOI at today's rents in current environment), and if its a big enough ordeal that you need a construction-style loan your occupancy definitely isn't high enough to not carry an interest reserve.

Refi at stabilization would depend on your strategy and current environment. You might do 10 year, you might do 5 (I don't want to lock into a 10-year if rates are high or if I'm planning to sell in 2-3). You might be able to get a loan with I/O payments for a period of time. Etc. etc.

 

It's still very situational. For lenders that I talk to these days, it's usually on an "in-place adjusted" NOI metric, like using the current rent roll minus T-12 expenses, adjusted for any obvious future expense variations (such as property taxes if you are buying in CA). This is for banks (regional and national). If you are talking to a debt funds, they could have a lower DSCR requirement (say 1.0x) but give more credence to your portfolio (I.e. your stabilized DSCR/DY). And on the flip side, generally insurance companies are the strictest and will have the highest coverage requirements (1.3-1.5x+).

Here is an example to answer your sizing question:

  • Deal is a value-add MF property, buying it for $10mm and putting $1mm in capex in, in-place NOI is $500k (I.e. a 5% cap rate) that you pro-forma will grow to $700k based on your business plan.
  • Your regional bank is going to give you a loan at a 5% interest rate with 30 year amortization, and they tell you that you are capped at 75% LTV, but have to hit a 1.25x DSCR (amort) on in-place.
  • Well, if you wanted to maximize your debt usage, obviously you would want to put 25% down right? Well that would mean you would have a $7.5mm loan at a 5% interest rate (~6.44% debt constant at 30 yr amort), so $483k of interest pmts. So you are at a 1.03x debt cover… not going to work.
  • Instead as CREnadian said above, you are going to have to size based on DSCR, so a 1.25x debt cover on your in-place income will give you 400k of amortizing interest expense to work with, which backs into $6.2mm of debt ($400k/debt constant). So in essence, you are actually constrained to a 62% LTV or 56% LTC.
  • Then, if you are modeling a refi, you could assume that you will refi proceeds out based on a loan sized to your pro-forma stabilized NOI. You could use a forward curve as a best guess, but these days it’s a gamble given how much rates have/and can shift over your hold period.
 

Every lender is going to have their own set of requirements - there is no one-size-fits-all model.

For value-add bridge, you're likely to run into sizing constraints based on:

  • Min DSCR (as-stabilized / post-reno) - likely sizing to a 1.25 - 1.35 on a stressed interest rate to model the take-out
  • Min DSCR (as-is) - Can be less than 1.00, but then there may be some additional structure such as an interest reserve or earn-out (lower initial proceeds + future funding based on performance) to account for the debt service shortfall at origination 
  • Minimum Debt Yields (both as-is & as-stabilized) - NOI / Loan Amount. Essentially a lender's cap rate to gauge risk
  • LTV - typically focused on as-stabilized based on an expanded cap rate & your post-reno NOI
 

Atque voluptatem non a voluptas possimus vitae aut. Accusamus commodi temporibus illum consequatur est. Sint a ipsa soluta rerum eius asperiores facere.

Sunt et facere et vel. Corporis dolores atque natus et debitis perferendis at.

Porro ad libero dolore. Sit recusandae quas consequuntur. Iure nemo corporis ducimus voluptatem velit voluptatem in in. Fuga assumenda assumenda quibusdam qui reprehenderit nesciunt enim.

Cum quisquam ut doloribus porro sequi consequatur. Earum fugit amet deleniti itaque et. Dolores inventore ut corporis in. Perferendis molestiae non nemo eius nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”