NAV Calcs for REPE Companies

Looking for some advice and guidance on where to find best practices for NAV/FMV calculations for REPE funds at the asset level.

Specifically:

  1. How frequently real estate investments are market-to-market evaluated (for example, if done quarterly, do they consider the most recent quarter and look back over a year)?
  2. Is the NAV calculation for a construction or redevelopment project essentially based on book value?

Curious if anyone has experience with this or knows of any resources on where to find. 

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Used to be in fund/portfolio management for a middle-market REPE shop focused primarily on development.  This is how we handled things:

You start with gross asset value (GAV) for each property in the portfolio, then adjust for any other items that impact value (i.e. lease-up / cost to complete discounts for dev assets - see more on this below). You'll then adjust for balance sheet items (cash on hand/working capital, mortgage & other outstanding liabilities, etc), which finally lands you at each individual asset's "gross" NAV.  You'll then multiply by the fund's sharing ratio/pro rata share - with adjustment for any waterfall structure - to arrive at your final deal-level NAV.  This is what gets rolled up into fund NAV.  You're essentially doing a hypothetical liquidation calculation as of the quarter end date. 

The nuanced part for development-heavy funds is the timeline/calculation of profit recognition, and every fund will have different policies for this.  At my fund, for instance, anything with less than 10% of hard costs complete is simply held at cost (i.e. fund's equity basis to date).  Once it hits the 10% hard cost threshold, an "as if stabilized" appraisal is commissioned and you go through the high-level process outlined above. 

On your specific questions, my experience has been: 

1) Almost always quarterly, but 3rd-party appraisals are only commissioned 1-2x per year to derive gross asset values.  Interim quarters gross values are at the discretion of the fund, but you've got to have rationale for any movement as the auditors will ask to see backup.

Sometimes there will be disagreements with the 3rd-party appraisers, as they are inherently backwards-facing in their analytics.  During post-COVID runup from late 2020 on, for example, appraisers were still comping to 2019-2020 trades and cap rates.  Their rents generally lagged the market and many times they'd simply use in-place without any credence to last 30/60/90 days leasing (which in some cases had moved 8%+ during that span)

2) To get more granular into the the development side of things, you start with total projected deal-level profit (appraised "as if stabilized" GAV less total budgeted cost) - again assuming you've hit some sort of % of cost complete threshold. From there you calculate development profit and lease-up profit earned to date. We used a 70/30 split for this but I'm sure others use something different.  Development profit recognized in any given quarter will be calculated by % of total cost incurred to date.  Lease-up profit is the same thing, just with calculation via occupancy as of quarter-end date (have seen others do net leased). We also keep a 10% profit holdback to be on the conservative side of things. 

Again, the exact methodology will vary from fund to fund, but hope the above gives you a general outline. 

 

The fund I worked at did it slightly differently. Personally I thought it was wrong as we didn’t start at GAV. Alas… 

The fund would take projected levered cash flows of the remaining investment, choose the discount rate, adjust for cash and other balance sheet items, and voila..NAV. 
Reason I didn’t like this: you had to pick your leveraged discount rate which is highly volatile and not a market number you could really even comp to. The way to do it is unlevered because there is data on unlevered discount rates. So while you are always ‘making up’ the discount rate in both levered and unlevered, at least with unlevered you can point to some tracked market data. 

 

Ea numquam voluptate sequi qui aut deleniti. Officia sunt accusantium dolorem doloremque cupiditate molestiae aut. Quia non velit maiores beatae quibusdam est dolorem. Consequatur neque fuga quisquam dicta et blanditiis. Iusto molestias est voluptatem suscipit voluptatem animi culpa. Ipsa impedit repellendus dolores officia mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”