Preferred equity vs common equity?

Why would someone raise common equity over preferred equity? If you hypothetically thought your deal was going to be a home-run, if you could raise the gap in your capital stack as preferred equity and retain all the upside for yourself, why wouldn't you do that? Maybe the answer is, "you would". Can someone but can someone explain how the dynamic that plays out in the real world in terms of when deals are funded with preferred equity investment vs traditional equity?

3 Comments
 

There’s nuance to the decision beyond just the consideration of upside at exit that you mention. You’re right, all else being equal, filling the cap stack with common LP equity allows for upside retention since preferred equity (without ups/warrants) is just structured paper that pays current and/or accrues to at least a minimum multiple most commonly.

That being said, there are other considerations to think about. For example, for certain development projects, a developer (the GP) may want to fund pari with common LP equity rather than funding their equity first, followed by the pref, followed by the senior. Secondly, consider a longer construction timeline (36 months) and stabilization schedule where the preferred equity is accruing. A developer may want to “de-risk” this basis accretion by raising common LP equity with a first waterfall hurdle much lower than the all-in preferred accrual rate.

There’s also control & consent rights and guarantor (carry, completion, interest) considerations vis a vis preferred equity vs common LP equity.

 

The situation I am imagining where you want to hold an asset indefinitely, and are able to return capital through refinance relatively quickly, to me this seems like a scenario where preferred equity would be a no brainer. You're paying a higher price for that money in the short term, but after that the rest of the cash is yours in perpetuity. Am I missing something?

 
Most Helpful

A eos dolores libero qui expedita distinctio sit. Soluta ad totam quia optio. Rerum sapiente odio cumque saepe amet quam. Provident aperiam aspernatur rerum rerum et. Omnis temporibus voluptatibus sunt ut magnam cum. Labore ab molestias exercitationem nemo. Mollitia vero est omnis fugit vitae rerum omnis. Incidunt placeat excepturi totam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”