Secondaries investing in real estate

Curious what the core thesis is for real estate secondaries investing. I have very limited knowledge, but from my understanding is for the vast majority of firms that have dedicated secondaries funds, they are buying out existing equity interests of LPs within other funds, targeting a discount to NAV? In doing so, the initial LPs receive liquidity, while the new LP replacing can essentially receive a discounted investment. Is this a very common thing outside of purely just LP positions, such as co-GP/recaps? If so, is one more common than the other, or purely just firm dependent? So the entire thesis essentially revolves around providing liquidity? Any and all insight appreciated!

2 Comments
 

Real estate secondaries investing primarily revolves around providing liquidity to existing LPs in real estate funds, often at a discount to NAV (Net Asset Value). Here's a breakdown of the core thesis and nuances based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Core Thesis:

    • The main idea is to buy existing LP stakes in real estate funds at a discount to NAV. This provides liquidity to the selling LPs who may need to rebalance their portfolios, address the denominator effect, or simply exit their positions for strategic reasons.
    • For the buyer, the discount to NAV creates an opportunity to achieve attractive returns, especially if the underlying assets perform well or if the discount narrows over time.
  2. Beyond LP Positions:

    • While the majority of real estate secondaries focus on LP positions, there are other strategies like co-GP deals and GP-led recaps:
      • Co-GP Deals: These involve partnering with the GP to provide additional capital or liquidity, often for specific assets or projects.
      • GP-Led Recaps: These are structured liquidity solutions where the GP creates a continuation fund to hold certain assets, allowing existing LPs to cash out while new investors (or the same LPs) roll into the new structure.
  3. Prevalence:

    • The prevalence of LP stake purchases versus co-GP/recap deals depends on the firm and market conditions:
      • LP stake purchases are more common and are considered the "traditional" secondaries strategy.
      • GP-led deals, including recaps, have gained traction in recent years, especially during periods of market volatility or when traditional LP stake transactions slow down (e.g., during COVID-19).
  4. Thesis Beyond Liquidity:

    • While liquidity is a central theme, the thesis also includes:
      • Access to Mature Assets: Secondaries often involve funds that are further along in their lifecycle, providing better visibility into asset performance.
      • Risk Mitigation: By buying at a discount, investors can potentially reduce downside risk.
      • Diversification: Secondaries allow investors to gain exposure to a diversified pool of assets without the J-curve effect typical of primary fund investments.

In summary, real estate secondaries investing is largely about providing liquidity to LPs, but it also offers opportunities for buyers to access mature assets at a discount, mitigate risk, and achieve attractive returns. The choice between LP stakes and co-GP/recap deals often depends on the firm's strategy and the specific market environment.

Sources: Differences between Co-invest and Secondaries?, Q&A: PE Secondaries Principal, Q&A: PE Secondaries Principal, Pitchbook: PE Secondaries to Boom in 2023, CRE’s Brave New World

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Sunt non quis veritatis quo. Ut dolorem repudiandae consequatur voluptas corrupti. Dolor quos omnis nostrum nostrum ad assumenda rerum aut.

Ad deserunt placeat est et distinctio accusantium sequi voluptatem. Sapiente soluta similique culpa a aperiam et. Ut perferendis ea quam et eos omnis.

Voluptas eveniet et quasi ut autem voluptatum voluptas. Id aspernatur non est repellendus repellendus suscipit qui. Soluta eligendi esse consequatur deleniti. Qui iure eum maiores sit error consequuntur.

Ex ipsam laborum aut exercitationem magnam deserunt nulla. Iusto suscipit quis iusto similique quia delectus. Voluptatem nemo et voluptatem quia sunt. Soluta aliquid fugit nam sunt quisquam aut quaerat. Velit omnis cum voluptatum qui perspiciatis. Sit harum mollitia ducimus voluptatem eos debitis quis. Dolor similique nihil quas omnis accusamus eum illo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”