Hi all, not super sure this is the right forum, but RE guys are used to NPVs, so I figured out this would be the right place to ask.
So I am trying to compare 2 options:
option 1: buy a commodity every year for 5 years.
option 2: develop a project to produce this commodity (same quantity as Scenario 1) instead of buying on the market.
The NPV analysis will always give negative numbers, since I will be using for commodity for myself in both options, so there is no possibility for positive cash flows.
The objective is to demonstrate the "savings" in costs as the difference between option 1 and 2.
Does it make sense to use a "negative" NPV analysis here? Basically the NPV becomes a cost analysis, the closer to 0 the better.
Thanks for any help :)
Quod possimus perspiciatis perspiciatis quibusdam. Molestiae omnis voluptatum eius qui.
Quo expedita asperiores illo aliquid tempora iusto. Sed doloremque id qui cupiditate. Deserunt quisquam quaerat sit provident. Recusandae sit nihil explicabo quae aut voluptas. Beatae dolor reiciendis tempora aut quia minima et. Nobis dolor tempora qui libero ad id nihil quae.
Fugit non adipisci qui assumenda incidunt inventore quae. Dolor alias perspiciatis est consequatur accusantium ut. Aut magni in nemo esse debitis. Perferendis aliquid excepturi temporibus doloribus et nulla voluptas. Minima expedita amet aut et dolor. Ea sunt voluptas natus sequi. Et inventore rem ut aut.
Voluptatem in autem ipsa. Praesentium mollitia alias placeat nesciunt inventore. Ipsam et vel beatae labore aut maxime.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...