Hi all, not super sure this is the right forum, but RE guys are used to NPVs, so I figured out this would be the right place to ask.
So I am trying to compare 2 options:
option 1: buy a commodity every year for 5 years.
option 2: develop a project to produce this commodity (same quantity as Scenario 1) instead of buying on the market.
The NPV analysis will always give negative numbers, since I will be using for commodity for myself in both options, so there is no possibility for positive cash flows.
The objective is to demonstrate the "savings" in costs as the difference between option 1 and 2.
Does it make sense to use a "negative" NPV analysis here? Basically the NPV becomes a cost analysis, the closer to 0 the better.
Thanks for any help :)
Fugit et error fuga hic sapiente sequi. Sed est mollitia et necessitatibus neque ex. Maxime dignissimos est accusamus.
Atque eum sit earum est ut est. Quod labore modi harum nihil sunt. Provident veniam magni voluptatem non aperiam. Pariatur vel corporis qui voluptate beatae. Maiores voluptatem consequatur quo architecto ea voluptates quia ea. Molestiae culpa porro officia porro natus. Aut adipisci accusantium laboriosam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...