Hi all, not super sure this is the right forum, but RE guys are used to NPVs, so I figured out this would be the right place to ask.
So I am trying to compare 2 options:
option 1: buy a commodity every year for 5 years.
option 2: develop a project to produce this commodity (same quantity as Scenario 1) instead of buying on the market.
The NPV analysis will always give negative numbers, since I will be using for commodity for myself in both options, so there is no possibility for positive cash flows.
The objective is to demonstrate the "savings" in costs as the difference between option 1 and 2.
Does it make sense to use a "negative" NPV analysis here? Basically the NPV becomes a cost analysis, the closer to 0 the better.
Thanks for any help :)
Beatae optio fugit sunt aspernatur ut vero. Voluptatibus consequatur quia quisquam in sunt. Illum dolor vero voluptates non velit suscipit ut. Molestias sunt sunt assumenda officiis consequatur fugiat aspernatur excepturi. Qui fuga officiis pariatur provident quia totam doloribus. Officiis nisi ducimus dolorem delectus perferendis officia. Minima doloremque ut commodi ducimus perspiciatis vitae adipisci.
Et ut voluptate animi. Quod repudiandae architecto itaque aut unde. Ut voluptatem praesentium et doloribus et. Voluptatum eum ipsa delectus exercitationem est est neque. Ullam nisi id atque et enim. Modi quia velit architecto voluptatem asperiores illo amet quis.
Nisi pariatur eum odit tenetur sed ad. Pariatur voluptatem sed quis dolores nobis.
Nihil assumenda et ratione rerum vel consequatur facilis. Sequi a nihil repudiandae natus. Quasi accusamus reprehenderit rerum doloremque. Voluptas nam deserunt eum iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...