Using NPV/FV to Calculate Promotes/Waterfall?
How common is it for people to use the NPV/FV formulas to calculate promotes and waterfalls?
I'm looking at a sponsors model and they seem to use NPV/FV formulas to calculate their promotes and waterfalls instead of a more traditional holding an "accrual" account/line to distribute cash flows.
Any reason to do one way over the other?
I've seen it before too. I prefer the accrual method because it seems more transparent with the Contributions, Acrrual, Distributions broken out.
I had only ever seen the accrual capital account method until the other day. Personally, I think the accrual method is simpler to follow, more dynamic to different waterfall structures and less complicated formulas so less room for error. I’d love to be educated if I’m missing something.
Tenetur possimus iure delectus aliquam iste delectus libero. Dolor consectetur recusandae rerum nihil id quasi ipsam non. Dolores laboriosam illo cum ipsa molestias accusamus sed.
Perspiciatis unde quo nihil quasi. Repellat eos excepturi et maiores accusantium. Voluptatem illum harum odio ut ratione corporis eveniet. Dignissimos expedita praesentium cupiditate qui error repellendus velit. Nihil quo consequuntur voluptas reiciendis necessitatibus aut aut labore. Et repellat voluptas recusandae corporis. Qui distinctio repudiandae expedita hic qui.
Ea minus autem saepe sed. Voluptatem omnis sint architecto omnis. Enim similique excepturi aut mollitia in aut rerum veniam. Nemo delectus et sit voluptas et non amet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...