Waterfalls

This is going to be hard to verbalize, but see if you can follow me.

If total equity needed for a deal is $100 million and the LP provides $80 million, but $2 million of that goes to the GP through an Acquisition fee that they then roll into the deal how does this waterfall work.

Does the LP accrue on $80 million or $78 million? does the GP accrue on $20 million or $22 million?

Does each party accrued on the dollars they put into the deal, but the percentage of distributions are shifted? etc?

This is hard to verbalize but hopefully someone follows

4 Comments
 

Pretty sure I follow. It depends on the deal / structure of the deal and JV Agreement, but typically the Acq. Fee is charged at the deal level not the LP. So technically the LP is paying 80% of the Acq. Fee and GP is paying  20%. The GP can use that Acq. Fee to offset their equity investment or pay their guys or whatever the GP wants. But for purposes of %s GP equity is still 20M. The deal remains 80-20 for purposes of pro-rata.

 
Most Helpful

This guy is right. An acq fee is usually a deal cost, meaning it is part of the unlevered project level cash flow (before you think about debt or equity %). So lender pays LTV % of it, LP pays (1-LTV)*80% and GP pays the rest. Now it’s always negotiable tho too - some lenders might say they aren’t paying it so you end up just paying out of equity. So something you’ll need to talk about. 

also, the wrinkle in your situation seems to be on the point of the GP rolling it into the deal. That will have to be an explicit decision between the partners - do you (LP) want this to be an 80/20 deal or a 78/22 deal? That fee is just cash to them so they can either invest more into the deal (while you the LP invest the same amount less because this doesn’t change overall deal costs) or they still only invest 20 and pay their guys / investors the fee cash they just collected. 

 

Pariatur fuga aperiam vero saepe vel non similique. Expedita et sit inventore atque illo dicta velit sint. Magnam rerum qui voluptatem et vero quaerat. Soluta fugiat laborum alias qui. Distinctio voluptatibus soluta laudantium. Perspiciatis qui et explicabo veniam voluptas.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”