What are characteristics of a "good role" in CRE?

In your opinion, what makes a good role in CRE? Seen a lot of members mention that they are in "good roles", curious to hear people elaborate on why their role is good. On the other hand, if you don't enjoy your current role, why not?

I'm not trying to compare Development vs. PE vs. Brokerage, more so good development gig vs. bad development gig. I'm interviewing at development/ PE firms and trying to determine the best job opportunities.

21 Comments
 
Funniest

Good Development Gig:

  • Strong team that will mentor you
  • Product type you're interested in
  • Proven track record / reputation
  • Available capital to do more deals
  • Existing relationships with LPs / Lenders
  • Pipeline of deals for you to work on
  • Good culture
  • Market comp with potential carry in the future
  • Upward mobility opportunities
  • Specialist construction management / marketing / accounting / AM teams to support you

Bad Development Gig:

  • Basically the opposite
 

Some of the determining factors are objective, like strong deal flow, access to capital markets, etc. like moneycre said.

The rest of it is up to you as a person, for instance - some developers care about building monuments. Some couldn't give a shit.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Folks are nailing it, some broad ones that jump to mind are:

  • Deal flow
  • Access to capital
  • Opportunities to get your hands dirty and lead teams
  • Mentorship
  • A focus on employees personal growth and help/encouragement to help them learn and build a network
  • Market comp

Personally, I prefer leaner investment teams, and would hate being widget #612 at Carlyle. Other folks might love that, and I totally get that, just not my bag. I want to be in the mud and the muck with a chance to be a little entrepreneurial..

 

Couldn't agree more with you. four more to add... 1) ethical leadership team that doesn't cut corners or do sketchy BS (can't find that out until you join the team) 2) ability to get promote/partnership in the future if you are crushing it. 3) values your opinion and implements strategies you recommend 4) politics, moron manager or liars

Array
 

Just a comment on the lean teams thing. You’re definitely right that leaner is generally better experience for a junior person. But just because a fund has a lot of employees doesn’t mean their deal teams aren’t lean. At some of the large funds, deal teams consist of two people: a senior person and a junior person. Carlyle is / was deploying a $5bn fund and they do a lot of smaller deals (aren’t buying companies or massive portfolios) so I imagine their deal teams are pretty lean if they’re going to invest that money in the allotted time. If you’re using 8% of your employees (Say 4 out of a 50 person team) to chase a 15 million dollar equity check, you’re not going to deploy $5bn in 2-3 years.

Centerbridge is an example of a large fund that I know runs two person deal teams. They have a senior guy as the relationship manager and the junior guy running the numbers. Although for corporate deals / large portfolios I’m sure that number increases, especially during the due diligence phase

Array
 

Oh I know their deal teams run that way, have bought and sold a lot of stuff from and to them over the years, and I just picked their name out of a hat. I know plenty of folks on larger funds' deal teams, plus most of their asset management groups, that are way more process focused/inclined to stay within their box rather than bringing some creativity or personal ownership to bear. Bought a deal from Blackstone/LivCor one time, and I'm not sure the asset manager knew where Dallas was on a map. Every shop is different and so are personal preferences... million different ways to skin that cat but need to do your own personal DD when looking at opportunities.

 
Most Helpful

Not a lot of comments specific to REPE so I will chime in. At the junior level, I think working a wide variety of deal types and property types is most important.

For example, some companies you work for will have a very broad mandate for their fund, or they’ll have separate pools of capital they can invest with (eg debt fund, opportunistic equity fund, core equity fund etc) and you could underwrite all of those opportunities. This means you could work on:

  • A preferred equity investment on a Beachfront apartment complex in Miami

  • An entity level, convertible preferred investment in a small but growing, private industrial REIT

  • Take-private of a shitty little hotel REIT (there is one ongoing now)

  • High Leverage Senior Loan on a portfolio of retail assets in LA

  • Construction Loan for a condo development in NYC

  • Sale Leaseback of a senior housing portfolio

If you’re going to work on the buy side as a junior person, the dream shop would be somewhere where you can screen / work on all the deals above and more. The more opportunities you’ve underwritten the more transferable your skills are or the more “dangerous” you are if you want to be cheesy.

There probably aren’t many places that can do every single one of the deals above (Eg, many funds won’t do condos or senior housing) but there are certainly places that can do 4/6 or 5/6.

If you’re on the REPE side, exclusively doing value add multi family JV Equity isn’t as exciting to me as investing across the capital stack and across all property types. Some may disagree - if you have a passion for multi family then by all means go to a multi only value add fund. But that’s my take

Array
 

I have a completely different opinion. Your goal as a junior acquisitions person should be to position yourself to become a successful deal guy. That is where the real money, challenge, and fun is.

It would be very difficult to be a successful deal guy if you do not become an become an expert in your niche. I have never met a successful non-junior acquisitions professional that is not specialist. Learn one of the four main asset classes like the back of your hand and stick to it. You're way more valuable as an expert in a single asset class than you are a generalist that has surface deep knowledge of multiple asset classes.

 

See my other response to Bateman, I’m not talking about 33+ year olds. Being able to close deals up and down the capital stack is just more exciting to me. Certainly as you move up, you’ll specialize in a property type. But looking at deals from multiple angles and having multiple solutions to a project that needs funding - to me, that’s one of the most interesting parts of being on the PE side of RE

Array
 

Goldman, Blackstone, Fortress, Centerbridge, GIC (probably most sovereign wealth funds), StepStone, Baupost off the top of my head.

When you’re 2-4 years out (24-26 years old), you’re not really thinking about becoming a deal guy yet. I would much rather be at one of the places where I get a super wide exposure when I’m young and then specialize later.

Array
 
"JSmithRE2010" Not a lot of comments specific to REPE so I will chime in. At the junior level, I think working a wide variety of deal types and property types is most important.

For example, some companies you work for will have a very broad mandate for their fund, or they’ll have separate pools of capital they can invest with (eg debt fund, opportunistic equity fund, core equity fund etc) and you could underwrite all of those opportunities. This means you could work on:

  • A preferred equity investment on a Beachfront apartment complex in Miami

  • An entity level, convertible preferred investment in a small but growing, private industrial REIT

  • Take-private of a shitty little hotel REIT (there is one ongoing now)

  • High Leverage Senior Loan on a portfolio of retail assets in LA

  • Construction Loan for a condo development in NYC

  • Sale Leaseback of a senior housing portfolio

If you’re going to work on the buy side as a junior person, the dream shop would be somewhere where you can screen / work on all the deals above and more. The more opportunities you’ve underwritten the more transferable your skills are or the more “dangerous” you are if you want to be cheesy.

There probably aren’t many places that can do every single one of the deals above (Eg, many funds won’t do condos or senior housing) but there are certainly places that can do 4/6 or 5/6.

If you’re on the REPE side, exclusively doing value add multi family JV Equity isn’t as exciting to me as investing across the capital stack and across all property types. Some may disagree - if you have a passion for multi family then by all means go to a multi only value add fund. But that’s my take

I agree with @JSmithRE2010" I think it’s best to be a generalist first then specialize. Deal flow, geographic diversity, product type diversity. 4/6 sectors is good. Allocating for different funds (core, value add, opportunistic, mezz, preferred equity); whatever that gets you thinking dislocation of capital, long tail, and other macro plays while analyzing the specifics of deals and jv partners.

You might be analyzing deals now that don’t make sense and you feel are higher risk but you’re following orders. See what happens a couple years from now and learn and hone your instinct.

Have compassion as well as ambition and you’ll go far in life. I am interested in digital immortality. Check out my blog at digitalimmortality.com
 

Repellendus inventore delectus similique repellendus unde perspiciatis. Nemo repellat ea libero repudiandae cumque voluptates. Soluta est sit amet et nam fugit similique.

Dolores voluptatem temporibus dolorum recusandae veritatis incidunt. Dignissimos asperiores et repellendus ut quos.

Molestias molestiae qui ex quae reprehenderit velit dolor. Est magni non quod est incidunt modi sed. Illo amet molestiae non quia odio. Error voluptatibus aut mollitia reiciendis quas aut deserunt. Non officiis molestias ipsa et et eligendi. Aut dolore praesentium eveniet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”