7 Comments
 

Means investors take their money back. May cause a fund manager to need to start selling assets. Can push asset prices down and hurt returns. That in return can damage the ability of the fund manager to raise capital in the future and put them out of business

 

How would the fund manager price the asset today and the money they would give them back as part of this redemption given there's been such few trades

 If there is a market for the asset and that asset is trading hands at a certain price, that would seem like a fair number to value the asset at unless those numbers are completely stale/outdated. Otherwise, I think there’s a GS saying or a Lloyd Blankfein saying that if you don’t know what the price is, sell some of it and then you can get your mark. Otherwise there are other ways to try to value it such as mark-to-model whereby the manager or a 3rd party like Houlihan Lokey or one of the real estate valuation firms can put together a financial model using like a DCF analysis or other types of commonly accepted valuation techniques like cap rates, precedent transactions, comparable publicly traded companies, net asset value, book value or the like and use that as a basis for valuation. Or the manager can see if their investor would be willing to take ownership of the asset instead of getting their cash back. 

 
Most Helpful

The key feature of the "open-end" fund is that each quarter they set a price (called NAV or net asset value) for each share interest in the fund and allow investors to buy and sell at that price. In normal times, there are "queues" for buying into the fund and selling out of the fund. Then each quarter, the fund manager "nets" the buy/sell orders and allows in as much new money as they want (they will generally not take what they don't think they can invest/deploy as cash drags down returns). In "normal" or "good" times there is usually more people wanting to put money in than take out, and there is an effective waiting list to invest. 

In "bad" times (like now....., when NAVs are expected to fall, and surely many did in 3Q), more people want their money back. The fund manager now has to manage, per the terms of the fund's subscription agreements, how to manage a "full queue"... This means giving back as much as can be allowed for with fund liquidity, and then make plan to provide more liquidity as best practical. This is where it gets messy...... fund managers have rules that allow them to basically claim "market trouble" or whatever and hold off selling assets. But this can only work so-long and investors (who you count on for long-term profitability) get pissed! So, eventually, the fund could be forced to sell assets at shitty prices.

Impact to the fund manager..... falling AUM means falling fees, falling NAVs mean no performance payouts (promotes) and thus no bonuses, plus it looks bad from a reputational point of view. This is the time where good managers earn their stripes, outperform now and you can have a great story to tell during a recovery and raise tons of new money! Fuck it up and look worse then peers and you could be permanently harmed (until management gets fired...). Stressful times ahead for sure! 

 

Corporis iste consequatur eos velit. Voluptas aut enim at totam. Unde quae impedit commodi suscipit vel et accusantium.

Quis illo a animi illo. Est iure maxime aliquam occaecati fuga reprehenderit alias voluptas. Vel perferendis vero aut quod. Officia quo facilis sunt et modi non qui. Rerum sunt est asperiores in beatae ipsa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”