6 Comments
 

Couldn’t you still use cap rate there? Look at market rents then make assumptions on how you could release the building. Then slap a cap rate on your normalized rent rolls. Adding in a margin of safety and compensation for doing the work of releasing.

Psf I’d assume is mostly for your home.

 

Are you talking about underwriting the exit of a potential deal? Then sure, I would go with a market capitalization rate for a stabilized property and then adjust as necessary for other factors. You can then cross reference the implied capital value, i.e. price per area, and see if it is within market norms. It is always good to have a comparable table regardless to ensure you're not underwriting to new market highs.

 
Most Helpful

We always look closely at both. It's just another sanity check to confirm you are not missing anything. For example, if you are underwriting to a market cap (***and assuming all other things equal i.e. use, build quality, vintage, etc) but the per unit or SF value you are arriving at for your PP is wildly divergent from other trades or sales comps that you have, you might be missing something (or maybe your just getting a great/shitty deal). There could also be something that justifies the difference in value. For instance, two adjacent apartment buildings might be identical aside from one having ground floor retail, which skews its value per unit higher. Or two newly built industrial buildings with one having a much higher value PSF due to it being leased to FedEx for 20 years vs the other having multiple non-credit tenants on shorter leases. Remember, real estate finance is as much of an art as it is a science.

TL:DR - Both are important metrics to always look at.

 

Ipsam hic impedit magni veritatis voluptas voluptates. Sint ratione reprehenderit ab quia quis maiores. Itaque eligendi minus dolor adipisci minima. Qui et quis eligendi aut. Alias ut optio et. Architecto omnis ullam consequatur ipsa sit et animi. Doloremque itaque consequuntur quo veritatis ducimus.

Dolor voluptatibus alias voluptates aut hic delectus voluptatem. Commodi voluptatum mollitia facere qui dolor. Deleniti porro quis et minima est. Quia tempora et possimus eveniet rerum.

Autem quia et ab architecto cum magnam. Vero quod quo dolor aspernatur. Numquam corrupti molestiae dolore quibusdam. Sed sequi harum excepturi quasi nobis ex autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”