MBA? Current big law

are you sure you're not the dumb one?

1. lawyers are already lobbying and persuading legislators to pass laws that will prevent AI from giving legal advice (https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/proposed-new-york-law-would-bar-ai-chatbots-posing-lawyers-allow-duped-users-sue-2026-03-05), and let me give you follow-on on this, to prevent the judicial system getting flooded with AI legal slop, they will start to fine on top of risking losing th ecase, killing any incentive for people to go solo to represent themselves. If you're concerned about transactional law, that's like a goldmine for lawyers if you don't get counsel and you're the one running the legalese with AI lmao 
2. leaving the artificial moat aside, law is a risk minimization field where a typo can fuck you. You could have >2% errors in a model or investment thesis without many consequences given that your input is mostly there to create confidence around pulling the trigger. In law even a single typo can lead to litigation/losses down the road. So how could you know AI's work is 100% bulletproof if you're not even a lawyer? you don't know what you don't know, so you won't even know whether the output is good or not 
3. if you think counsel reviews a contract just to tell you what it says, you could do that too, but you're just a retard. There is a difference between reading a contract and legally assessing a contract. You're so oblivious to that distinction that you wouldn't even understand the difference.
4. lawyers, engineers, and doctors will also stay and have a higher moat than finance because people generally want humans in roles that decide the fate of other people.
5. the economics of law firms also favor lawyers being more resilient than finance because partner-to-associate leverage is foundational to a firm's economics. Associates are direct drivers of revenue. In finance juniors are not direct revenue generating roles. They're support staff for the MDs and Partners who are actually responsible for generating revenue.
6. besides, I could start a law firm if barred. What about you? What can you do with your finance experience besides hoping some company or fund recruits you? Given that much of your work can be done with AI, the odds are against you.
7. what about finance? So far, I'm aware your MD could lay off 60% of their workforce and still operate normally. PE could also kick 70% of their associates with almost no friction because junior roles spend most of their time producing materials that are then passed to seniors for decision-making, which is to say that the decision-making is the relevant part.

"wOoOoAh AI will replace lawyers" meanwhile law firms are posting record revenues and PPP... lmao... good luck walking into court with AI because can't wait to see another retard get fucked by their overconfidence in AI.

But I mean, how would you know all of this if you never stepped inside a law firm... you're just an ignorant kid  without any critical thinking echoing what you hear other retards say... sheep behavior... you should start reading and form your own views... stimulate your mind a bit... which I see is not doing great... 

If that's true why are there countless examples to contradict you directly, all in the last 10 years?