Cambridge MPhil Finance and Economics vs LSE MSc Finance vs LBS MFA
As the title suggests, I am undecided between three offers for pre-experience 1-year long masters in finance. Cambridge has an unique brand and aura to it, but the programme is run by the economics department, not the Judge Business School (How much does that matter to employers? ). It is meant for students that aim to "work in industry", not academia. How does it compare to LSE MF and LBS MFA? I intend to work in financial services in the UK. (Also, I am assuming the Oxford MFE is comfortably better than all three)
When comparing Cambridge MPhil Finance and Economics, LSE MSc Finance, and LBS MFA, here’s what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:
Cambridge MPhil Finance and Economics
LSE MSc Finance
LBS MFA
Oxford MFE
Key Considerations for Your Decision:
Brand and Prestige:
Placement and Networking:
Program Focus:
Location and Experience:
Conclusion:
Sources: European Masters Rankings, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/uk-master-in-finance-advice?customgpt=1, LBS MFA vs Cambridge MPhil REF
If you want to decide which UK university to attend based on having a dominant brand globally, then choose Oxford over all of them. No UK university (or any uni in the world except Harvard for that matter) has more prestige, fame, pedigree, and international brand name recognition than Oxford in any part of the world. Shoot for the MFE if you have the opportunity.
Cambridge MPhil is not exactly considered Tier 1 for such masters from what I have heard. Make no mistakes it is a great university, but employment outcomes are a bit below. Great for research though and crazy brand name.
LBS MFA and LSE MiF are both Tier 1 with good placements even though the market is very bad. Depends on what you look for, I think LBS MFA has slightly better outcomes because of strong career centre and they really want you to get the job. LSE is more academically challenging and you will have to be more by yourself. Great university still once again we are really cutting hair.
Speaking of Oxford MFE I can also say it is better but not comfortably lets not exaggerate. Either way you will be good with any of those programs.
Having some exp in the field will help you more than the difference between the MFE and the Mphil.
To conclude here is my list for finance Oxford MFE>LBS MFA=LSE Mif>Cambridge MPhil. All great programs!
LBS MFA is good. Their cohort is very big now though (300 ish students) so you'll see more diluted outcomes. Cambridge is the most selective out of these but not as good professionally. You will get screened but the kid from lbs which had more time to network will stand out.
Lse is worst from these. Selection is in the shit, honestly have seen so many dumb nuts there. No time to network, too academic. Name is prestigious still but outcomes don't match
An EB MD I networked with ranks Oxford MFE=LBS MFA>LSE MiF>Cambridge
Et molestiae sed quam qui beatae sit praesentium. Molestias eum quia sunt cumque nesciunt. Expedita saepe velit numquam placeat at nihil omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...