Different approaches of the DCF analysis

hello im very new to finance ,and i've been trying to study a bit the DCF analysis can anyone enlight me on the differencies between:

-entity approach -equity approach -adjusted present value approach

thanks

10 Comments
 

i have already read that tutorial, and while it has been very helpfull, it didnt help me finding the differencies between the 3 approaches.

for example, from what i understand the difference between entity and equity approach are:

-entity: the discount rate used is a proportion of the cost of equity and debt based on the "quota" of debt and equity of the firm

-equity: it uses only cost of cost of equity as discount rate

is that right?

thanks

 
Best Response

This "Entity" is more commonly referred to as "Enterprise Value," hence my confusion. Also, arriving at Enterprise value is not a different approach from arriving at Equity value, but rather a step in the process depending on where you want to go with the analysis...

Enterprise Value = Equity + Debt + Preferred + Minority Interests - Cash

You are technically correct correct in saying, "the discount rate used is a proportion of the cost of equity and debt based on the 'quota' of debt and equity of the firm." However, this is commonly referred to as the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) and is used to discount levered (enterprise value) Free Cash Flows back to Net Present Value.

Adjusted Present Value (APV) is a different approach for running a DCF and aims to separate the Present Value of the company from effects of financing such as an Interest Tax Shield.

 
evan1482^^ incorrect. The WACC is used to discount UNLEVERED free cash flow, i.e. cash flow to the firm, to calculate enterprise value. LEVERED free cash flow would be discounted at the cost of equity to arrive at total equity value.

That is correct, I was originally addressing his cost of equity claim then deleted it to talk about WACC and didn't change it to unlevered fcf. However, while his post was rife with clear misunderstanding, you chose to find the one error in my response and frame it in a condescending way? Fuck you guy.

 

sorry, as entity i meant asset approach, which should be something like valuing the entire company without keeping track of how its financed

edit:sorry if i sound vague, but its the first time that i have to study stuff like that, so i will probably have tons of errors in my posts

 
ergansorry, as entity i meant asset approach, which should be something like valuing the entire company without keeping track of how its financed

edit:sorry if i sound vague, but its the first time that i have to study stuff like that, so i will probably have tons of errors in my posts

The only Asset Approach I know of is finding the Net Assets = Assets - Liabilities. This approach represents the Book Value of the assets, or basically what GAAP says their worth, NOT the market valuation. However, because the balance sheet keeps track of how the assets are financed, this is necessarily taken into consideration. The three most common approaches used by Investment Bankers for valuation:

1.) Precedent Transactions 2.) Comparable Companies 3.) Discounted Cash Flow

 

Get the basics first.

Two good places to start (one free, one you must pay for - but well worth your money):

Professor Damodaran's website (he also has several books on valuations): http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/home.htm

And Josh Rosenbaum and Josh Pearl's Investment Banking book (has a very practical chapter on how to perform a DCF): http://www.amazon.com/Investment-Banking-Valuation-Leveraged-Acquisitio…

Once you get the fundamentals down, then feel free to ask some more nuanced or peculiar questions (related to finance). You'll get a lot more from this site that way.

Cheers.

Capitalist
 

Et sunt ullam et eos. Et laboriosam optio quia quia mollitia dicta. Non doloremque labore natus cupiditate est consequatur. Error inventore aut quo cum sed alias voluptas. Quod omnis iusto sit placeat ex quam. Voluptate fugiat et aut corporis quia doloribus soluta.

Aut quis dolorum est est. Quasi facilis dolorum eum porro accusamus. Natus praesentium esse ut quisquam est totam. Quia voluptatibus consequatur nemo et et.

Laborum dolorem quae possimus nihil consequatur. Aliquid eos assumenda repellat porro est. Dolorum nostrum suscipit dignissimos nihil. Provident dolor iusto laudantium amet. Enim consequatur eum minus consequuntur aut itaque.

Metal. Music. Life. www.headofmetal.com

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”