A bit of backstory; graduate of top 15 MBA a few years back and current consultant. I get a lot of people from my MBA's undergrad and random cold people on Linkedin reaching out for career advice (my school is strong for IB as well). I'm noticing more and more of these kids are from MSF programs, and I'm really having trouble seeing what it is doing for them. From my (albeit limited) observations, kids from these schools:
- Don't have top firms coming to campus
- Start networking waaaaay too late in the recruiting season
- Don't seem to have robust career support on campus
Am I missing something with these programs? Is it selection bias from the people reaching out? Would love to be proven wrong/hear other stories. Just from my standing, I don't see why I'd pick one of these degrees if I wanted to go IB (and struck out in UG/came to it late). Seems like it is far better to work back office/audit/operations for 3-5 years and then nail the GMAT and go for a top MBA.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, your observations about MSF programs align with some common critiques, but there are nuances worth considering. Here's a breakdown to help you better understand the MSF landscape and its value for young applicants:
1. Purpose of MSF Programs
2. Challenges with MSF Programs
3. When MSF Programs Make Sense
4. Selection Bias in Your Observations
5. Why Not Just Work and Get an MBA?
6. Top MSF Programs
7. Advice for MSF Applicants
Final Thoughts
MSF programs aren't a one-size-fits-all solution, and their value depends heavily on the individual's background, goals, and the specific program they choose. For those who missed the IB boat in undergrad, an MSF can be a viable path—but only if they approach it strategically with early networking and realistic expectations. If you're mentoring young applicants, encourage them to weigh the pros and cons carefully and to consider their long-term career goals.
Sources: Is Networking Better Than Doing A MSF Program?, MSF or MBA for my experience level?, Ohio State MSF vs Villanova MSF
cheaper and less time
Instead of wait 3-5 years you can take a gamble and network your butt off and try to do it with only one extra year of school. I also think a lot of them are people coming out of undergrad not wanting to do what their undergrad is in and instead of sit in a shitty job to maybe get into a good MBA you take the extra year to try and pivot into finance without having to completely rebrand.
Half the price, half the time, more specialized/in-depth than an MBA, and grants access to the same network.
As someone going to an MSF, it is because my undergrad school and major are not going to get me a good job at all, esp not in this market (def not one that would help get into or afford a top mba - how many people from ops were at your school?).
If you look at MSF profiles they’re usually from a low-ranked undergrad, unrelated major, or did all the right things and were unlucky with recruiting. We do NOT want to stick it out in a job we dislike for 5 yrs (that sounds depressing;). An MSF changes the course of your career if you’re coming from education, liberal arts, etc. or know you could get into your desired role if you had 1 more year.
The masters are not nearly as strong as the undergrad, but there are a handful that are well directed. Recruiting is an uphill battle for 10 mo programs, but the good ones give access to career services right after you commit so it’s not as bleak (get in & prep starting Spring, matriculate & recruit in Fall).
People who did MSF -> IB already did their "2 yrs and out" by the time they would've applied to an MBA, and don't need to go back to school. But many people aren't entirely set on IB, and there are some early career roles that are not common from MBA. ik someone who turned down Vanderbilt MSF (considered the "#1" bc of consistent IB outcome) for UT bc he felt that way and ended up in S&T, for example. another person went from grade school program coordinator to investment analyst at Emory's endowment.
And thank you for helping the MSF students who reach out. One of my worries is that MBA/UG alumni of the school will snub me. Do you feel they present themselves well/are worthy candidates for the job?
Appreciate the perspective.
Many people in my program had back office-ish backgrounds (myself included). Granted, they also had great all-around profiles (high test scores, good career progression, outside charity work).
I'll pretty much talk to anyone for two reasons: 1) I genuinely have a passion for coaching/teaching 2) I'm someone who didn't exactly knock their undergrad experience out of the park, so I recognize a lot of people are like me and get their affairs in order in their early 20's.
Not trying to be elitist/a jerk, but regarding your question on how the candidates presented themselves, most of the MSF kids didn't blow me away. Many of them didn't network well at all/know what they wanted (A few even attached their resumes in their initial outreach message and straight up asked me for a job!). Granted, I'm not really hearing from kids from Vandy/G-Town/Similar tier, mostly nontarget MSF programs.
Aspernatur enim quisquam aspernatur nulla qui. Dolorem sunt tenetur molestias minus. Qui perferendis perferendis sunt minus sed. Ipsam ut dolore perferendis quisquam voluptate quia. Esse aliquam libero provident.
Hic id et eveniet quia rerum commodi. Accusantium qui at numquam eaque eius ipsam corrupti quasi. Nihil corrupti doloremque dolor nulla quisquam natus. Magnam voluptatum ut omnis iste velit fugiat. Sed natus hic totam minima nobis.
Rerum totam rem consequatur odio rem veniam. Quod molestiae occaecati quod reprehenderit odit non. Dolores omnis impedit numquam harum. Sit officiis voluptatum repellat nostrum. Unde quod velit asperiores dolorem ex.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...