How is Yale Good for Finance?

I know some of you will come at me, and call me crazy, but I just don't see how Yale can be considered good for finance. Before I get called a Yale hater, or what not, I would like to point out that I attend a HYPSM and I don't inherently hate Yale, as it was my dream school for the longest time. When I was applying, I got into to Yale early action, and I even considered not applying anywhere else since I loved everything about the school. Obviously, upon further research I came to my sense and decided to apply elsewhere. Trust me, I really love Yale, but it's just awful for finance.

Sure, its "name brand" will get you some nice Wall St. gigs, but I've rarely seen Yale grads in leadership roles on the "buy side". I know Yale has had some BB bank CEOs and some people in federal roles like Mnuchin, but I've done extensive research on some of the largest PE, HF, and VC firms, and Yale is nowhere to be found. If you don't believe me, I recommend you see for yourself. Go to MBBs, top hedge funds, etc, and literally no one on the leadership is a Yale alum. I'm not arguing Yale's merit as an overall institution, or its placement for entering into finance since the name will go a long ways. What I am saying is that Yale sucks (for a lack of a better word) in production of alumni at the pinnacle of the industry. This is an area in which Harvard and Wharton dominate the competition, which does beg the question of how good Yale truly is for finance.

Obviously Yale does have Schwarzman who is at the top of arguably one of the largest buy side firms, but other than that, there really isn't anybody. Even if you look at Blackstone's leadership, it's riddled with Wharton, Harvard, and other schools, but never Yale.

Moving away form Blackstone, take a look at Citadel, Two Sigma, Elliot, Renaissance, Pershing Square, Bridgwater, AQR, Lazard, Carlyle, Apollo, etc. Yale alums are not in leadership roles. You'll find Wharton, Harvard, Princeton, NYU Stern, Stanford, and other "less prestigious" (in the context of name recognition), but I never find Yale grads.
Now you can argue that big fund managers all haven't gone to likes of Harvard or Wharton, and you could cite the likes of Ray Dalio, Israel Englander, John Paulson, Einhorn, Tepper, etc, and you would be correct in saying you can to schools other than HW and you would still succeed. But that's not the point I'm making. Other than Eddie Lampert, Yale is again nowhere to be found. Harvard has a presence int his scene with people like Ackman, Paulson, one of the Ziffs, etc. Wharton has an even larger presence.

Before you mention Yale being #3 on the current undergraduate alumni billionaire list, I would like to point out that Yale has the largest concentration of inherited billionaire with only 5 or 6 (I believe) being self made. For a school made out to be the #2 ivy league, I find it laughable how bad it truly does in producing wall street "top dogs". Yale churns out politicians and lawyers like it no ones business, but it is truly awful for finance.

I know measuring billionaire or ultra-high worth alumni is a not complete representation of a school, but that wealth is a byproduct of the schools production in the job market. A school might not make billionaires (Mark Zuckerberg didnt need Harvard to be Mark Zuckerberg), but when a school like Harvard, Wharton, or Stanford consistently produce people like this, I think it need to be taken into account. And even if, Yale's mediocre amount of Wall Street execs can be attributed to selection bias of humanities focused students, then it needs to be noted that this will have affects on your career. How can you dismiss the fact that you will be automatically at a disadvantage when the majority of your school alumni are lawyers, politicians, actors, or writers? You automatically at a loss against Wharton or Harvard students who have an exorbitant amount of high up alumni in finance. Why should I care that Yale alumni are decorated artist or politicians if that has zero upside for a career in finance.

So how can it be argued that Yale is a good school for finance. I've often people say HYPW will all give equal opportunities for a financial career, but I just don't see how that can be true when you look at people in senior/ leadership roles. Sure, Wharton and Harvard may have a disproportionally large amount of students aiming for Wall Street, but even with that, the difference in senior roles is glaring between the two schools and it can't just be attributed to less students going to finance, because Yale also has a large amount of grads entering finance every year.

I just don't understand how the argument can be made for Yale being on par with HP, Wharton, NYU Stern, Columbia when it does extremely poorly in producing billionaires. I've seen time and time again on this forum Yale being recommend over Stern, Columbia, Cornell, UMich, and even some suggesting Yale over Wharton/ Harvard, citing the college experience being better at Yale. It doesn't matter if you'll get to have more fun and go to more parties at Yale when schools like HW are constantly outperforming it at every level of the industry.

Again, this is just my opinion. If any of you have any opinions on any of the schools, I would love to hear what you have to say. I just want to reiterate that I by no means hate Yale. In my honest opinion, Yale, along with Stanford, are the most complete, well rounded, and enjoyable undergraduate experiences. But this doesn't translate into the school being better for finance which is why I'm genuinely curious why its recommend and raved about so much on this sub.