INSEAD vs Oxford vs NYU (part time) vs Kellog/Booth (Part time)
I'm a little hard pressed on time and by the time I start my MBA I will be 28 hence my inclination towards 1 yr MBA (INSEAD, OXFORD) or part time program. 2 yr seem awfully long.
INSEAD (1 yr program, But unsure if it will help me get a placement in US) Oxford (1 yr Program and mostly rely on the brand name) NYU (Good location but one notch below Booth/Kellog) Booth/Kellog (Great school but bad location)
Would like to have some opinions from folks who are familiar with these programs and the potential pros/cons.
I don't think 28 is too old for a full time 2 year program. In fact, 28 is pretty much the average age. This situation may be different if you're married/got kids, but if not than I say still go for full time program and take some time to Chill.
Also - Chicago is not a bad location! I understand wanting to work in NYC after words if you're going to be in IB, but spending 2 years in Chicago is by no means painful - I bet you'd find it pretty enjoyable.
Why is Chicago a "bad location?" Your face is a bad location.
Have you already gained admissions to these schools? If so, congrats. If not, Kellogg HAS a one year MBA program that you can apply to.
That being said, I feel like 28 isn't too old for a regular, full-time, two year MBA program.
Quia et dignissimos quisquam distinctio sed omnis. Autem qui aliquam cum sint. Doloribus et officiis quae sunt at.
Est maiores ducimus est et. Voluptatem ea quasi et.
Aut a libero pariatur rerum. Optio pariatur quis ea asperiores ut iusto. Distinctio reprehenderit unde at iste id officia. Cum adipisci doloremque nihil officia.
Consectetur non dicta saepe ipsum eveniet. Beatae voluptas qui iure. Cupiditate quia quod veritatis ut laborum sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...