LSE MSc in Finance VS HEC International Finance
I'm a second-year bachelor's student who recently received an admission offer for both the master's in question. I have no real work experience in high Finance. I plan to start a career in IB and eventually shift to the buy side after a couple of years, potentially in the USA through an MBA.
I was wondering which one of these two masters could open me more opportunities, professionally speaking.
I believe that HEC is a nepho school (except from the master in international finance) and that LSE academic curriculum will equip me with the needed knowledge to excel.
Nonetheless, LSE has no mandatory internship in its curriculum, and my fear is that "wasting" too much time studying could preclude me from some opportunities when it comes to applying and getting ready for job applications. Also, the LSE employment report shows a much lower median income than HEC Paris (70k vs 116k), which makes me believe that what I heard about the spoiling LSE placement is true.
What should I do?
When comparing the LSE MSc in Finance and HEC Paris MSc in International Finance, both programs are highly regarded and can open doors to Investment Banking (IB) and buy-side roles. However, based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key insights to help you decide:
1. Career Opportunities and Placement:
HEC Paris MSc in International Finance:
LSE MSc in Finance:
2. Program Structure and Duration:
3. Geographic and Long-Term Goals:
4. Networking and Alumni:
5. Your Concerns:
Recommendation:
Ultimately, both programs are top-tier and will position you well for IB and buy-side roles. Your decision should align with your career goals, geographic preferences, and the importance you place on internships versus academic rigor.
Sources: European Master in Finance programmes (pre-experience), Msc Finance ranking Europe, European Masters Rankings
HEC is better for recruiting so if you don’t have experience choose HEC.If you have experience you can still land an internship or off cycle at lse just be slightly harder as your facing more competition.
But to me it seems that with visa restrictions, London is quite inaccessible from HEC. Despite the employement report of HEC having more than 50% of the graduates working there (most of them from continental europe).
Most big companies sponsor seen people from HEC land megafund and top BB and EB so you should be fine the people who stay in France get top internships and full time roles in Paris
Where have you seen that HEC MIF lasts 16 months?
You are right. Still is 14 months (enough to say you have 2 years before the end of college so that you can compete against undergrad)
If you somehow actually believe HEC is a nepo school then go ahead and go to LSE
Nepho got offended
Congrats on both. I'd go with HEC.
Lse is great, but the outcomes don't match the hype or the price tag.
Go to LSE way more known globally
Congrats on the HEC admission. Did they offer you any scholarships?
In a similar boat as well.. what are the implications for a non-European (American/Australian). If want to work in London, I assume for someone that is not French and needs Visa then LSE/LBS is a safer bet as opposed to being stuck with HEC and unable to get a job in France due to language or London without visa. Can someone confirm? Or am I incorrect, would London actually sponsor a non-French HEC graduate?
Dignissimos consequatur nihil nihil enim. Id molestiae ipsum et blanditiis id neque magnam. Perspiciatis itaque doloribus qui ea expedita nihil sequi. Provident suscipit corporis dolores sed labore repellat quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...