Desks in order of quant-y-ness

Incoming 2022 SA in S&T with an econ/finance background interested in trading. I know a little python but I wouldn't consider myself a very "STEM" person, more macro-oriented. How would you all rank the following desks with respect to how much applied math/stats/cs is used on the trading floor?

- EM Credit

- HY/Distressed Credit

- rates securities

- rates swaps

- G10 FX

- EM FX

- Commodities broadly speaking

7 Comments
 

convexitymaven, hey, look at the bright side, at least you didn't get a ton of monkey shit thrown at you...here is my best guess on threads that might be helpful:

More suggestions...

I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

I think this depends on if its the cash or the derivative product. 

  • EM Credit - Corporates aren't quanty, sovereign is quaniier while credit derivative side is quanty(think cds, cds index, options etc)

  • HY/Distressed Credit - not quanty, not macro either; though could be a interesting space to be in. 

  • rates securities - quanty, the core macro product

  • rates swaps - quantier than treasuries, again main macro product

  • G10 FX - cash is less quanty, vol side may be quanty

  • EM FX - same as above

I went through the placement process not too long ago and ended up choosing a macro derivatives desk. Feel free to PM if you have any questions. Good luck

 

My list by order of quant to not

  • rates swaps - linear rate derivs tend to be marginally more quantitative than linear fx derivs

  • G10 FX (linear ex. spot) - I'd argue G10 is marginally more quanty than EM as many EM risks simply aren't quantifiable and are instead esoteric

  • EM FX (linear ex. spot)

  • rates securities 

  • EM Credit - cash side is not quant

  • HY/Distressed Credit - cash side is not quant. there's modeling/valuation but its not quant.

  • Commodities broadly speaking - 0 experience here but would say paper is quant, physical is not. both potentially interesting

your background should be fine on any of the above desks - pick one that interests you

 

Unde enim magni harum id laborum. Qui qui fuga voluptatibus autem sapiente ea. Animi non quos impedit voluptatum ducimus facere molestiae. Consequatur quos vero ducimus quod ut similique culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (24) $180
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (82) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”