What kinds of fixed income Excel models are used in trading/research? Is it usually just basic duration/PV01 stuff or something more complex? If anyone has a sample model they could share via PM or name some book/website that goes over any such model, that'd be great too.
Thanks, any insight is appreciated.
Binomial interest rate trees and monte carlo simulation for RMBS. I can't really speak as to whether or not they're commonly used though.
They are in research. (According to the few people I actually know in MBS research)
It really depends on what kind of FI you are talking about. As was said in the post above me, monte carlo simulations are used for mortgage backed securities, but not really in corporates or gov. debt. For additional modelling in credit research, you are using your basic 3-statement models etc. Credit research actually looks a lot like equity research, you are just focusing on different metrics and downside vs. upside.
Actually pricing bonds is where the different models come in. You have your DCF and tie it to a binomial tree and your target yield curve (or spot or forward w/e).
Again, want to reiterate, this is all just second hand from what I have gathered from speaking with a couple guys in FI trading and research.
PCA is pretty common. Otherwise, it is pretty basic, although, if you wanna get fancy, there ain't nuthink stopping you.
Second what Nakaldun said for credit research but that's mostly HY. For valuation, we look at capital structure to see where value breaks off and go from there.
In IG, a lot more is done on a relative spread basis, but just my observation.
Fixed Income Models (Originally Posted: 03/15/2007)
What models do fixed income traders use for valuing fixed income securities?
DCF
Thats kind of a broad question, to say the least.
What is the most commonly used model, and are different models used for different fixed income securities (bonds, CDOs, etc...)
A lot of the swaption vols are quoted as Black vols -
oh
for rates: black, Hull white, cheyette, bgm, depending on product.
pricing a bond is pretty straightforward, doesn't require much of a model...
Jimbo, I'm only familiar with the Black and Hull White models-- can you please explain the cheyette and gbm models to me (or link to some papers) and the general idea of how their dynamics are different from the admittedly very simple movements of the ones I listed above? (ps i'm taking a grad-level stat course this semester so feel free to be esoteric)
I think models are asset-specific in structured land. For instance, expected losses for ABS models seem to be more econometric cross-sections. Market implied approaches rely heavily on time series. CDO are usually normal copula driven, though approaches still vary significantly. Tweaks like jumps or transformations are common, but the basics usually seem consistent. These results are used in conjunction with other models for appropriate risks (IR, FX, prepay, transitions, etc.) to get pricing.
Whether of not any of these are appropriate is another issue. Pricing for risk is very different than pricing for profit. Idiosyncracies and structural characteristics make apples difficult to find in some markets, I suspect.
Devin, it's beyond the scope of this forum. Cheyette is one of the simplest skew enabled models. Google Cheyette CEV and you'll get something.
BGM is better at capturing vols and correlations in general, and it's used frequently for rate exotics....it's monte carlo based and for callable structures can be pretty computationally intensive, especially b/c you have to also run longstaff-schwartz or something similar to determine exercise strategies and boundaries for the berm.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=427084
in general though, if you want quant....go to wilmott....
Est ut est hic natus. Tempora sunt deleniti tempore. Quo ab cupiditate aut eligendi sed ut. Ab nostrum quisquam quibusdam at neque commodi aspernatur.
Earum aut aut necessitatibus maxime nihil. Et aut et ipsa ut.
Officiis qui repellat quia vel quam. Incidunt dolor magnam perferendis iste adipisci. Perspiciatis ad eligendi dolorem dolor.
Perspiciatis dolores repellat reiciendis sit labore culpa eum. Quo dolor ab incidunt magni. Temporibus consequuntur dolore blanditiis deserunt. Dolores dolor ipsum magni. Praesentium officia quia corrupti error qui dolores est repellendus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...