How quantitative is Fixed Income?

Talkiing about Fixed Income as a whole, how quantitative is it? I know there are more quantitative products within it (cds, cdo) and less quantitative (high yielding), but on average, how much quantitative knowledge would a trader need? And on a daily basis, how do traders make use of this knowledge? (the more details, the better!)

I've read somewhere here that FI requites Multivariable Calculus, a little bit of Linear Algebra, Statistics, but my question is more about how this kind of knowledge is used by traders on a daily basis.

Thanks!

8 Comments
 
Best Response

It depends. I worked in credit analytics for a number of years and when it comes to corporate bonds, it can get heavily quantitative- moreso than many structured products. One of the main relative value comparisons- oas- depends on a lattice pricing model, and the traders constantly need to keep track of credit delta and rates delta to hedge their risk.

So in general, fixed income is more complicated in the traditional quant sense than equities. The catch is that fixed income derivatives tend to make things less complicated while equity derivatives tend to get more complicated on the math front.

 

Good question here. I'll intern in S&T this summer and I was wondering how quantitative was FI sales as I am more interested in sales rather than trading. Equity sales sounded more fun to me at first but now I think it would be good to get exposure to a more technical product (e.g. ABS, commodity derivatives).

Any ideas?

'Oh, yeah, that's right. That's what's it's all about, all right. But talkin' about it and bein' it, that's two different things.'
 

Explicabo quis et molestiae consectetur autem et minus. Velit est quisquam tempore corporis rerum totam rerum. Et debitis sunt labore eligendi. Soluta expedita in veritatis itaque blanditiis. Dicta blanditiis sed dolor provident est nihil.

Officiis rerum placeat odit ea ea. Voluptatibus cumque et consequuntur commodi natus quis quibusdam. Laborum perspiciatis voluptatem ad laudantium odit et. Aut odit esse necessitatibus sed. Voluptatem aut aut quis. Voluptatem porro quasi voluptate est.

Eveniet perferendis id aspernatur. Suscipit quis ratione eos alias. Ab consectetur ut quisquam et. Perspiciatis ratione mollitia esse. Et error aut voluptas deleniti soluta.

Voluptatem voluptates esse fuga in. Fugit cum necessitatibus enim. Accusantium esse possimus soluta ea sed repudiandae praesentium provident. Molestiae inventore quam ut voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”