Obama and the Oil Market

I'm curious as to what some of you think about this latest attempt by the administration to control oil "manipulation". How much manipulation actually occurs? As opposed to speculation which is an important part of the futures market.

Seems like another short sided idea. Kind of reminds me of when they hiked up gold margins in an attempt to drive down prices.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-17/obama-wi…

Any thoughts?

12 Comments
 

Oil? Manipulation? HAHAHAHAHA

Think one month before the 2004 election when oil prices dipped: Bush makes a few phone calls to some old family friends and promises some sweet new military gear if they open the taps up a bit for a few months.

This time around, they'll try to subsidize it because that's how Dems typically roll. I didn't read this bill, but I'd venture that's the plan.

Get busy living
 
Best Response

Yeah, after OPEC, the world's biggest oil manipulator is often the federal government. Three months before the 2000 election, Clinton opened up the SPR and Cheney started complaining about it, claiming the reserve was strategic. More recently, the Keystone Pipeline veto helped ensure that WTI stays about $15/barrel cheaper than Brent, benefitting Midwestern refiners, farmers, and motorists at the expense of the Canucks. This is arguably one of the biggest, most long-term price manipulations in the oil markets of the past decade.

That said, you guys also forget Enron and Amaranth. It is possible to attempt abusive market corners, and I think we have a more efficient market when we try to get commodities to trade on fundamentals rather than letting T. Boone pickens come in, reserve all of the pipeline capacity crossing the Appalachians, and charge New York $10/therm for natural gas.

So spending more money on transparency and more consistent enforcement isn't a bad thing.

 

There's a place for passive speculation. If you can consistently make money betting on oil's fundamentals, we need you in the market, because you're going to send signals to tell people to consume less or to consume more.

The problem is when the speculation becomes activist. If you are trying to shift the fundamentals off what they should be rather than help everyone else discover them, that's when the system starts breaking down, and that's when I have trouble staying a libertarian. Buying refining spreads on 20 mbpd and then shutting down five refineries producing 2 mpbd does not create economic value even if it makes you money.

 
IlliniProgrammerThere's a place for passive speculation. If you can consistently make money betting on oil's fundamentals, we need you in the market, because you're going to send signals to tell people to consume less or to consume more.

The problem is when the speculation becomes activist. If you are trying to shift the fundamentals off what they should be rather than help everyone else discover them, that's when the system starts breaking down, and that's when I have trouble staying a libertarian. Buying refining spreads on 20 mbpd and then shutting down five refineries producing 2 mpbd does not create economic value even if it makes you money.

I definitely agree. You cannot do away with pure speculation because historically it is used as a gauge for the supply of a commodity. Speculating actively borders on manipulation as it drives prices up without taking in consideration of the actual supply or demand, and also those wanting to make big money in a short period of time, which is contrary to what a futures contracts are.

www.purechecks.com
 

52 million dollars added for more whistle blowers.... In the futures mkt the amount of buys = sales. How can there be manipulation?

Understood you may try to bully the mkt come to settle but multiplying the cftc by 6fold isn't constructive.

 
EarTotheStreet52 million dollars added for more whistle blowers.... In the futures mkt the amount of buys = sales. How can there be manipulation?

Understood you may try to bully the mkt come to settle but multiplying the cftc by 6fold isn't constructive.

The Hunt Brothers tried to argue the same thing when they almost successfully cornered the COMEX in the early '80s.

The reason Wall Street is on Wall Street and not in Houston- and we all have jobs- is that the COMEX officials and the SEC stepped in and decided that abusive corners and market manipulation were illegal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Thursday

 

I guess it doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum you are on, all politicians participate in some sort of blame game in the energy market. At least when it affects their re-election. But to think that the oil market is over priced due to manipulation, not a cheap dollar and the fact that demand is increasing in the emerging markets, irritates me. Even though the cornering of a market can happen, it doesn't seem like WTI at $105 is "rampant manipulation"

I am just simply tired of all political pandering that disregards the reality of the situation.

Thanks for your thoughts.

 

Dolor omnis ea odio consectetur nihil. Rerum necessitatibus cum ut voluptas sequi blanditiis. Est at dolor porro voluptates iste optio. Esse quia quasi id voluptatem.

Sit nam aut ab deserunt voluptas mollitia laborum. At eveniet modi voluptatem cumque earum. Voluptas eos dolorem minima asperiores qui aliquam. Voluptatem ipsum placeat vitae. Earum dicta temporibus est autem et. Est nulla mollitia ad aut omnis iste. Assumenda vel nobis aut et modi ducimus eius.

Doloribus corporis nisi voluptatem cupiditate ex qui in optio. Non corporis officiis aspernatur illo laboriosam illum distinctio. Hic fugiat vel ut quae eligendi laboriosam nulla. Saepe odit voluptatem sunt dolorem quia. Non tempore omnis est sequi tempore.

Quisquam quo officiis qui hic error. Enim ea voluptatem nobis incidunt autem qui vitae. Qui temporibus eaque cupiditate aut expedita consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”