S&T in London

What's the S&T recruiting scene like for London? I imagine less competitive than the US. But, what kind of A Levels are expected, and how is the process different to the US?

I know for consulting jobs if you have a certain number of UCAS points / Degree level (first/2:1 etc) / GPA then you will get the interview. How does it work for S/T? Thanks!

12 Comments
 

Nowadays, they're looking towards more quantitatively minded people. That being said, having a humanities (non econ) background could help you stand out too. They want to see you're comfortable with numbers. Can't speak for the US but in the UK, I really did appreciate that not having a finance background didnt disadvantage me during interviews too much.

A Levels they'll be looking for, it doesnt matter too much except for Maths which will be most valuable for having that critical thinking and problem solving mindset.

Array
 

Also minimum 2.1 (A 1.1 will always be better) and a certain number of UCAS points which will be listed in the job description when you apply.

Array
 

Some traders say that about salespeople, some salespeople say the same about traders and structuring people say it about both... More seriously, there are smart people on all desks. If you are a good sales, traders will speak to you first and share axes. Information is the most valuable thing on a floor. And if you are a good trader, salespeople will be transparent with you, try to get you on calls with clients, and share feebacks and clients views. Again, information. If you are a good structurer, sales/traders will keep you updated on potential trades and ask you to work on their transactions. If you're bad at what you do, doesn't matter what desk you are on, information won't come.

 

Depends on the desk. Flow desks are not as "technical" as derivatives or structured products desks.

In a structured products seat, you need to run pricings and need to understand payoffs, need to speak to trading/structuring and discuss payoffs with clients so technical skills are important.

In a flow seat, you have more macro economics and research reading to do and speak about to clients.

 

Depends on the desk. Flow desks are not as "technical" as derivatives or structured products desks.

In a structured products seat, you need to run pricings and need to understand payoffs, need to speak to trading/structuring and discuss payoffs with clients so technical skills are important.

In a flow seat, you have more macro economics and research reading to do and speak about to clients.

 

Thank you for the insight. This is very helpful. I'm not very well versed with the things you're speaking about unfortunately. I consider myself to be not very great at maths. I can manage in my degree in with various maths and statistics modules but I still wouldn't consider myself very good. Would you say that the level of technicality is "difficult" or rather just requires effort and time to learn? Thanks again for all the help.

 

S&T is not really mathematically challenging except for quant roles, its just basic math with finance concepts. You can learn all the concepts to join a desk pretty quickly and then you will learn the rest on the job. You could do some research to understand how a floor is organized: asset classes, flow/structured, sales/trading/structuring etc so its easier to network efficiently and ask relevant questions to learn more about what people do.

 
Most Helpful

Nam quibusdam qui esse aut. In totam id iusto a. Inventore in quia beatae cum et deleniti.

Dolorem sint consequatur officia. Ea aliquid dolor sit sed est doloribus eum illum. Ducimus doloremque minus enim repudiandae. Possimus qui quos distinctio ex rerum. Reprehenderit porro aut voluptatem perferendis nostrum incidunt possimus et. Eligendi et totam accusantium aut.

Commodi ut saepe vitae vel et esse laborum. Eius ipsum nulla aut in ipsam ullam et. Error molestiae non omnis nostrum exercitationem.

Quo voluptatem fuga et fuga. Eligendi maiores provident facilis sit est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”