Structuring or management consulting

Hi,

I've got an associate offer from a 2nd tier IB (RBS/bnpp/SocGen) in structuring in london and an analyst offer from a top consultancy (say McKinsey) in the asian emerging market country. The first position pays obviously more and seems to be more interesting,  but I still can't figure out what exit opportunities it may have, and how being from a bad no-name bank may hurt my career in the long run.

What would be better to choose? What do u think about this dilemma?

8 Comments
 

From what I hear most structuring positions at these places are on exotic deriv S&T desks for equity, fixed income, commodities, or cross-asset.

i'm gonna bump this post cos i'm in a similar situation myself except that the consulting offer at mck is associate level which erases the (current) pay differential. both positions are NYC office.

Would love to hear any opinions and thanks much in advance!

 
Best Response

In addition to the link that Jorgé posted:

The product you're structuring definitely plays a big role - not all structuring desks are the same. If you're doing structured notes, the work environment is very different from more flow-based structuring (e.g. exotic/structured/customized derivatives). I've had experience on both types of structuring desks. If you want something more fast-paced, then definitely go for a flow-based structuring desk. If you're more biased towards working on projects that have extended timelines (relatively speaking, of course), then go for the structured notes desk.

On the structured notes desk, people usually finished between 7:00 to 8:00 PM everyday and were usually the last ones off the floor (with the exception of maybe DCM). The process of developing and issuing a structured note usually spans a week or two, depending on the complexity of the product you're trying to structure. Whereas on the flow-based structuring desk, people usually left anywhere between 4:00 to 5:00 PM (i.e. "typical" trading hours). This type of structuring desk more resembles your typical flow and agency trading desks.

Please keep the above in mind when you're making the decision between structuring and consulting. Best of luck in whichever road you choose! I'm sure a million people would kill to be in your shoes right now with multiple offers.

 

Hi JCI, other than the hours, what is the difference between the structured notes and flow-based structuring desk? Why the difference in pace and hours?

Thanks in advance!

 
cacamboHi JCI, other than the hours, what is the difference between the structured notes and flow-based structuring desk? Why the difference in pace and hours?

Thanks in advance!

Structured notes are often tailored for retail investors/channels. As a result, developing and issuing them is a much more tedious task, which causes a structured notes desk to be more project-oriented. A structured notes desk is similar to a DCM Desk, in the sense they both issue bonds. But a structured notes desk issues bonds, whose coupons are variable and can be based on anything (e.g. single-stock equities, indices, currencies, etc.).

A flow-based structuring desk can basically be characterized in the same bucket as any other exotic agency/flow desk, except a flow-based structuring desk deals with very complex derivative trades. Think of the more exotic option structures/strategies (e.g. Variable Rate Forwards, Knock-Out Forwards, KIKOs, Conditional Forwards, Range Bonus Accruals, Fade-In Forwards, Accumulating Forwards, etc.).

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.

 

Are you kidding? BNP and SocGen are no-name banks in structuring?

I am not sure which planet you live on, but you clearly have a lot of research to do to begin with.

 

Nostrum ad sint atque omnis distinctio est. Inventore nam porro possimus et sequi aspernatur. Nam consectetur adipisci ducimus dolores molestiae qui autem. Ullam non aut in a.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”