Traders Sharpe Ratio

Hi, I am very confused about the Sharpe ratio with respect to Traders. How is a Sharpe Ratio calculated for traders? Often I have seen in many Trading job posting, it would say to write down Sharpe ratio on resume. Why is that significant? And what do you compare it to, for example, let’s say Trader A has a Sharpe ratio of X, how would I know if that is below or above average? What is a good Sharpe ratio? I have copied the following job description from a online job ad, “Candidates must have experience with Equities, Futures or Currencies as well as high Sharpe Ratios” What do they mean by high Sharpe ratio and how would a trader calculate it?

Thank You,

21 Comments
 
milkenAnd what do you compare it to, for example, let’s say Trader A has a Sharpe ratio of X, how would I know if that is below or above average? What is a good Sharpe ratio?

It depends on the strategy the trader is using. That particular job is for high frequency trading and this strategy requires high Sharpe ratios. However, Louis Moore Bacon and Paul Tudor Jones, two of the greatest macro risk managers ever have Sharpe ratios of 1.23 and 0.86 respectively on their flagship funds.

Source: http://www.offshore-rebates.com/pdf/aurum/Aurum_Brochures_July_08.pdf

 

Performance measurement using Sharpe Ratios is a tricky issue. If they know what they are talking about, then in the end it matters what index they are measuring against, and what the risk free rate they are using is.

For example, that attachment by PTJ uses Risk-free as 5%, which we know nowadays is not possible. Use the 3 month to 1 year treasury yields as the risk free rate, of which the 3 month is 0.18 yield.

To put it into perspective, I was approached by Hedge Fund recruiters for the NY area that preferred Sharpe's above 5. The Sharpe at the fund I am now at is a Sharpe of 20.8.

 
cap_and_tradePerformance measurement using Sharpe Ratios is a tricky issue. If they know what they are talking about, then in the end it matters what index they are measuring against, and what the risk free rate they are using is.

For example, that attachment by PTJ uses Risk-free as 5%, which we know nowadays is not possible. Use the 3 month to 1 year treasury yields as the risk free rate, of which the 3 month is 0.18 yield.

To put it into perspective, I was approached by Hedge Fund recruiters for the NY area that preferred Sharpe's above 5. The Sharpe at the fund I am now at is a Sharpe of 20.8.

A 20.8 Sharpe ratio huh? So your fund could offer returns between 90-110% with 95% certainty?

Certainty? Since you're using that word, my guess is you aren't even in the industry. You've never professionally managed money, and you may have an awesome $500 TD Ameritrade account, but you will never be Anything more.

Looking at all your posts, here is what I see: "That was very stupid." http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/market-crash "And c'mon - slaying Jappy Murray Hill chicks gets old after your first year. Please tell me you're not in your "TFA/Americorps chick" phase now." http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/livingworking-in-stamford "They are all nerds, they all travel the same, hours are basically the same, exit opps are basically the same." http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/differentiating-mbb

So hmmm, you're a pissed off little ass who hates everything. That almost surprises me, since all you care about is kicking around online. I have better things to do than care about what you have to think. Loser.

 

Uh, no - you're clearly the one who isn't in the industry if you're going on about your 20.8 Sharpe ratio. I do work in the industry, but I'm not going to get into a dick wagging contest with you.

Every few months, another shitdick comes and talks some bullshit based off his internship at some small shop in Colorado or something his finance professor told him while he was jerking off to his CAPM model - I suppose it keeps the site marginally entertaining.

cap_and_tradeCertainty? Since you're using that word, my guess is you aren't even in the industry. You've never professionally managed money, and you may have an awesome $500 TD Ameritrade account, but you will never be Anything more.

Looking at all your posts, here is what I see: "That was very stupid." //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/market-crash "And c'mon - slaying Jappy Murray Hill chicks gets old after your first year. Please tell me you're not in your "TFA/Americorps chick" phase now." //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/livingworking-in-stamford "They are all nerds, they all travel the same, hours are basically the same, exit opps are basically the same." //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/differentiating-mbb

So hmmm, you're a pissed off little ass who hates everything. That almost surprises me, since all you care about is kicking around online. I have better things to do than care about what you have to think. Loser.

 
Best Response

...the sharpe rartio is a really flawed statistic, as it selects for managers who are usually short-vol. The type of guys that usually have big Sharpes are quant shops like LTCM or Goldman Global Alpha whose strategies were really no different then selling out of the money options over and over again. For example, if one simply levered up and sold way out of the money puts on S&P's they would run up a huge sharpe ratio as they racked up steady/non-volatile returns until of course something went wrong and they finnally got stung and blew up. This is why "long vol" traders who actually make value-added bets on markets often have not-so-great Sharpes. I'll take Louis Bacon or Paul Tudor Jones with sharpes around 1 any day of the week over some quant shop running a black box with a higher sharpe...the black box is probably an accident waiting to happen...a bomb that has just yet to detonate. A lack of vol in the past, even for years in the past, does not indicate a lack of vol in the future.

BTW a sharpe of over 20 is ridiculous. Please re-check your math. No further comment on that.

 
"Bondarb" ...the sharpe rartio is a really flawed statistic, as it selects for managers who are usually short-vol. The type of guys that usually have big Sharpes are quant shops like LTCM or Goldman Global Alpha whose strategies were really no different then selling out of the money options over and over again. For example, if one simply levered up and sold way out of the money puts on S&P's they would run up a huge sharpe ratio as they racked up steady/non-volatile returns until of course something went wrong and they finnally got stung and blew up. This is why "long vol" traders who actually make value-added bets on markets often have not-so-great Sharpes. I'll take Louis Bacon or Paul Tudor Jones with sharpes around 1 any day of the week over some quant shop running a black box with a higher sharpe...the black box is probably an accident waiting to happen...a bomb that has just yet to detonate. A lack of vol in the past, even for years in the past, does not indicate a lack of vol in the future.

BTW a sharpe of over 20 is ridiculous. Please re-check your math. No further comment on that.

Without even going that far, I still do not see why favorable volatility in returns should be penalized as much as negatives for general purposes. Honest to god i hate it that people confuse vol with "risk".
 

Ea quas enim voluptatem atque doloremque. Et magni harum sint quisquam ea tempore labore esse. Ipsam omnis tenetur rem unde aut. Quae reiciendis enim adipisci rerum. Aspernatur molestiae corporis nulla quia sed assumenda.

 

Maiores beatae magni voluptatem voluptatem enim non eaque doloribus. Necessitatibus non sapiente qui. Minus suscipit velit esse blanditiis harum non.

Natus est occaecati officia occaecati. Et sunt itaque eius et. Quam velit facilis dignissimos magni aut eos.

Incidunt consequatur rerum laborum. Tenetur quia veniam ut quis ea optio blanditiis aut. Et velit sed harum incidunt est quisquam.

Et placeat rem cumque iusto debitis et. Autem sit non necessitatibus voluptatum praesentium quaerat. Doloribus dolores quisquam aut quam. Libero nisi similique soluta rerum nam quo rem vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”