Trading from UIUC

Hey guys, I'm a sophomore at the University of Illinois and I'm very interested in a career in trading. And I was wondering which type of trading internships/careers (S&T, prop shops, etc.) would I have the best success of landing from UIUC. I'm not oblivious to the fact that UIUC isn't particularly the greatest school to land a trading job or internship from, but any input would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

 

1.) Switch to CS or ECE. If you can't do that, consider a double major in something a tad softer like Industrial Engineering, maybe Stats or Actuarial Science. You do need to crank out some As in hard-hitting math and stats courses though, and ideally need to become an excellent programmer in the process. 2.) Keep taking some finance classes. 3.) Graduate and go to a GETCO, Jump or Citadel, like so many other UIUC Engineering alumns.

Best of luck!

 

I graduated from Baruch College. I received offers from both Jump and Citadel and I'm a trader at Jump now. I'm not going to lie to you, all the other traders on my desk either graduated from harvard, princeton or MIT. But if you are good and take some hardcore math classes as well as programming classes, you have a shot of getting in as well. You probably never even heard of Baruch, yet I made it here, so there is nothing that is impossible.

 
Best Response
woohoobaby:

I graduated from Baruch College. I received offers from both Jump and Citadel and I'm a trader at Jump now. I'm not going to lie to you, all the other traders on my desk either graduated from harvard, princeton or MIT. But if you are good and take some hardcore math classes as well as programming classes, you have a shot of getting in as well. You probably never even heard of Baruch, yet I made it here, so there is nothing that is impossible.

My recollection is that Jump and GETCO are teeming with UIUC alumns. Citadel certainly is. UIUC at Chicago prop shops is like Cornell or NYU on Wall Street. It's like "You're a programmer or HFT guy at a prop shop. Let me guess- you went to UIUC. WHAT? MIT? Wow, that's weird, that's long trip to Chicago!"

The caveat is that the UIUC folks at some of the best firms are largely Engineering/CS majors. It's counterintuitive, but if you want prop trading out of UIUC, don't study finance- study engineering. (If you want IBD, fine, study Accy or Finance.)

 

Thanks for the advice guys! And I'm currently a Fin major (you could have guessed) and I'm picking up a minor in CS. I really don't have the time to double major in anything because I didn't come in with any hours. But would you recommend the same advice if my number one goal was S&T at a BB? And since I brought that up, what are your thoughts on S&T at a BB vs something like GETCO, Jump, Citadel, etc.? Thanks again, I honestly appreciate this a lot.

 

Yes. I'd especially recommend the engineering advice for BB S&T. In the first place, Wall Street (at least S&T at a major NYC investment bank) has 2-3 times more STEM undergrads than finance undergrads. UIUC Finance is not at all competitive with UPenn Wharton, but UIUC Engineering beats the pants off of the Ivies and gives MIT and Stanford a run for their money.

If you want to work in Treasury for Allstate in Northbrook, IL, study finance. If you want to be a trader at GSAM, study CS. To be fair, GSAM will hire you as a desk strategist rather than a trading assistant, but the best route to wall street from UIUC runs through ECE, CS, or maybe another engineering discipline along with some finance courses. You can double-major in CS/Finance if the college of business will allow it, but a CS minor is not going to cut it.

Finance can get you to Chicago Trading Company or Wolverine or the like, but Chicago prop trading looks a little shakey these days TBH. To be fair, finance/accy gives you a better shot at IBD, especially at one of the Chicago branches or a RW Baird or William Blair. But if you want trading, you need to start from a really firm quantitative base in an industry that's been moving more quantitative over the past thirty years and now seems to be moving further into stats and systematic strategies territory. And the best way to do that from UIUC is an Engineering degree.

I'm not going to be the asshole who says a bright, motivated UIUC Finance grad can't make it to BB S&T. It's definitely possible, but it's hard as hell because the system is rigged against you. You're from a state school; they're (mostly) from Ivies (plus NYU, MIT, Stanford, and the occasional CMU/Amherst alumn). You're a finance major; their school doesn't even teach finance. They think you basically have a degree in CAPM and using financial calculators.

But the engineers will respect a UIUC CS degree. They have to. They went to some fricking liberal arts ivy, took 24 credit hours of programming courses, and call themselves CS majors- UIUC, Berkeley, and UT Austin students take closer to 80. That's part of the reason why UIUC outranks the ivies in Engineering. They know their job didn't require a finance degree to do well, and they're willing to hire you as someone from just as strong a program as theirs'.

Well, you asked for my opinion. I still think all of the students at UIUC are all about as smart as each other and that nobody is really better than anybody else. But at the risk of being a douchey Engineer, I am going to say that there is a clear route to BB S&T from Engineering, but the route is less clear from the College of Business. (Of course, there are a lot of finance majors working at Chicago prop shops.) The clearest route is ECE/CS-> Strats/Quant Analytics-> BB S&T (or trading at a hedge fund). This route also gives you more options for your career. If all the alpha gets squeezed out of the vanilla commodities and equities products, and engineer can handle corporate bonds and some of the less crazy exotics. As an engineer, you have the prereqs for an MFE. As an ECE or CS major, you have the coding background for doing stuff with Big Data or HFT. This is not a Stanford ORFE PhD, but it's as close as it gets in versatility at the undergrad level from UIUC.

Look into the requirements for switching majors to CS or CE, start taking Math 225, CS 173, and the calculus courses. Check out the engineering career fair, count the number of prop shops, hedge funds, and BB S&T groups recruiting, and compare that with the business career fair.

 
VandelayIndustries:

I'm not oblivious to the fact that UIUC isn't particularly the greatest school to land a trading job or internship from, but any input would be appreciated.

??? If you're a STEM major, UIUC is probably one of the top 5 or 10 options out there, for either undergrad or grad school. I can't imagine that translates poorly for S&T recruiting in Chicago.

And if you're an in-stater...it's a no brainer.

 
Ipso facto:
VandelayIndustries:

I'm not oblivious to the fact that UIUC isn't particularly the greatest school to land a trading job or internship from, but any input would be appreciated.

??? If you're a STEM major, UIUC is probably one of the top 5 or 10 options out there, for either undergrad or grad school. I can't imagine that translates poorly for S&T recruiting in Chicago.

And if you're an in-stater...it's a no brainer.

OP says he's a finance major.

UIUC is a top 20 finance school, but Wall Street, irony of ironies, doesn't get "finance undergrad". They get "Wharton", "NYU" and maybe "Cornell Applied Econ".

The engineers on Wall Street get that UIUC is a great engineering school. I'm not sure you'll be able to land straight into a trading role there, but you can land as a desk strat which IMHO gives you more and better options within trading and the capital markets in the long run.

The strat is the guy who ultimately (1) does what the traders tell him to do but (2) is the guy who ultimately helps the traders figure out how to trade- how to understand and manage all of the information coming in.

Good strats can become traders or they can head straight to a hedge fund.

 

So far I think you've made a lot of good choices. If you're in-state, UIUC was worth turning down anything short of a top ten school for. (Heck, it's a ~top 40). You've started looking into Wall Street early. You chose a major that gives you a good shot at a well-paying middle-class job.

The only tweak I'd make here is having you take a long-hard look at ECE or CS. And I'd recommend an ECE or CS degree over a finance degree if you have to choose, although you can do just fine out of UIUC with a finance major. (I'm just not sure you'll make it to Wall Street.)

 
VandelayIndustries:

Well then here is a big question. Would you recommend me staying extra *years* to change my major and pick up ECE or CS? Because there is absolutely no way I'd be able to change majors now and finish in my scheduled four years.

Are you paying in-state tuition? What CS courses and what math courses have you taken? Are you in Business Honors? Are you allowed to stay a finance major and double major in CS? (Engineers were allowed to double-major, but I think the business college had some rules around double majors, but this was seven years ago.)

Let me help run the numbers on this. I think this will cost you a semester, maybe two; I doubt it will be two years. If you can double major in finance and CS, and you're paying in-state tuition, and it only costs you a semester, and you can handle CS (this is a big IF), it's TOTALLY worth it IMHO.

Hopefully you've taken CS 125 or 173 and gotten a taste for the courses. I believe you also need CS 173 for the minor. Regardless, you need to take both of those for the minor or the major, and if you haven't, I recommend taking them both next semester so you can preserve optionality. Otherwise, you need to take 225, which I believe is also required for the minor, and 273, which is required for CS majors but I think fulfills one of the electives for the minor. If you can make it through CS 225/273, you can handle the rest of CS. If you aren't getting at least a B once you've gotten past the midterm, drop them and stick to Finance.

You also need to start working on the math sequence (three courses of calculus, plus linear algebra, diffyq and probability) and perhaps the physics sequence (three semesters).

I see 70 hours of CS requirements, plus 12 hours of Physics courses. That's 82 credit hours. Divided by 5 semesters, that's a workload of about 16 credit hours per semester:

https://wiki.engr.illinois.edu/display/undergradProg/Degree+Requirements

Subtract 4 credit hours if you've taken 125; another 3 if you've taken 173.

If you are willing to work hard and if you take CS 125 and CS 173 next semester, I'm pretty sure you can graduate one semester late. Incidentally, that gives you two shots at summer internships. But this means no more partying, no more fraternities, etc. You can save the partying for AFTER you graduate and after you get a six figure job in Manhattan.

 

Again, if you take two CS courses next semester and get your business Calculus requirements out of the way via Math 221 and Math 231, you preserve your optionality to make a decision next semester.

If you make a decision this semester, you may also be able to get started on the Engineering physics sequence. (Physics 111 IIRC.) Physics may also qualify as an elective or gen ed for a business major, although it will lower your gpa.

I'm not saying this will be easy, but I think you can still graduate in 4 years. If not, my guess is that it will take something more like one more semester, maybe two, although it will be less painful at that rate and you may be able to pull off a double-major.

As a CS major going into finance, knowing what I know now, I'd have been borderline on adding a Finance major to a CS major. It's certainly worth the tuition and cost of living for a year; I'm not sure it's worth a year of work. So I'm not calling the work you've done in finance a sunk/lost cost if you go the five year route and double major.

CS WILL lower your GPA.

Banks do need to see a ~3.3 GPA to hire you.

 

does it really make sense to suddenly change gears and cram all these cs and math courses, perhaps using extra semesters?

while programming is clearly a useful skill, the probability of him successfully getting straight A's in a ton of math, stats, and cs classes that he is not used to and moreover landing a job in HFT at Getco or Citadel is pretty low

there are a lot of opportunities in business and finance that don't necessarily involve being a technical expert, and they can be just as rewarding.

 
cauchymonkey:

does it really make sense to suddenly change gears and cram all these cs and math courses, perhaps using extra semesters?

while programming is clearly a useful skill, the probability of him successfully getting straight A's in a ton of math, stats, and cs classes that he is not used to and moreover landing a job in HFT at Getco or Citadel is pretty low

there are a lot of opportunities in business and finance that don't necessarily involve being a technical expert, and they can be just as rewarding.

That's why I suggest cramming 173 and 125 into the same semester and seeing how it goes.

These are tough classes, and you need a 3.2-3.3 GPA out of UIUC CS to be credible. You don't need a 3.7.

If OP can get an A in one of those two classes and a B in the other, he is off to a good start. He doesn't need straight As; just a 3.3 GPA. If I see a 3.5 GPA between CS 173 and CS 125, I have enough confidence to say that a GPA would be at least a one sigma event (~16% chance)

If he can't pull off a 3.3 GPA, stick to the CS minor (he is already halfway done) and stick to finance. He is most likely heading for a prop shop or maybe BP-Amoco's trading team, or maybe executing trades at Allstate, but BB S&T is still a remote possibility.

I still think he needs to do the Engineering Math Sequence to keep his options open for an MFE. Math 221, 231, 242, 225, 285, and 461/463. These may lower his GPA a little, but they'll give him opportunities for an MFE, MS CS, or perhaps a PhD in Finance or Econ.

I really really hate to suggest this, and there are a lot of ways to evaluate people besides just academics, but if you can't pull off a 3.7 GPA in Finance at UIUC or a 3.3 GPA in Engineering at UIUC, you may not be cut out for sales and trading at a Citi or a Barclays or a MS or a GS. These aren't easy jobs. They make CS 473 (Senior level Algorithmic Theory) look fun and easy. They make Fin 300 or Fin 413 look like a joke of a class that everyone should get an A in blindfolded. Obviously I expect a phone call five years later from OP after he gets a 3.6 in Finance, lands at BP, and then lands on GS's oil trading desk telling me I'm a F***ing idiot, but at least he will respect the other things I said in this paragraph. Getting a 3.7 GPA in finance at UIUC is relatively easy compared to being a sell-side trader. Getting a 3.3, heck, a 3.5 GPA in ECE or CS at UIUC is relatively easy compared to being an S&T Strat.

Look, I'm a huge booster for UIUC and Big Ten students in general on Wall Street. I've gotten into a shouting match to get a UIUC engineer with a 3.6 GPA an interview, and I'd do the same for a finance major with a 3.9 and some tough math courses under his belt (if this was for trading. I might drop the math courses for IBD, but I don't work there.) But you have to want this job, because the kid from NYU and the kid from Cornell wants it pretty badly too, and he may just be smarter and harder working than you. My advice is to switch to Engineering, if OP can swing it, and go for a Strat or FO Quant Developer position. That is the one clear direct route from UIUC into the front office of a GS, MS, Barclays, Deutsche, Citi, BAML, or JPM. You may be able to pull it off from Finance, but it's like running an Ironman vs. running a 13.1. Reasonable people with a bit of training can pull off a half marathon; an Ironman takes more discipline than most reasonable people (including me) can handle.

 

IlliniProgrammer, I'm wondering why you think that the chicago prop scene is looking 'shakey'. Most of the top prop firms I've had superdays with are drawing kids that have offers at BB S&T (at least from the other candidates I've interviewed with). You make it seem like the prop scene is a fall back plan for those who can't make it to banking, but with most of the top firms paying a base of around 85k while only working 60 hours a week, it seems like a better route.

In regards to UIUC, if you're trying to do trading engineering is the route to take, in final rounds pretty much every kid had a background in engineering, math or CS (or a double major in one of the three with finance added in).

 
econometricks:

IlliniProgrammer, I'm wondering why you think that the chicago prop scene is looking 'shakey'. Most of the top prop firms I've had superdays with are drawing kids that have offers at BB S&T (at least from the other candidates I've interviewed with). You make it seem like the prop scene is a fall back plan for those who can't make it to banking, but with most of the top firms paying a base of around 85k while only working 60 hours a week, it seems like a better route.

In regards to UIUC, if you're trying to do trading engineering is the route to take, in final rounds pretty much every kid had a background in engineering, math or CS (or a double major in one of the three with finance added in).

Sure.

A lot of prop traders that I speak to, though, say that a lot of inefficiency is getting squeezed out of the liquid markets. At the very least, the model of "no overnight positions" seems to be running into trouble, and some traders I know have gotten nervous because trading doesn't really teach a lot of transferable skills.

GETCO, Jump, DRW, Optiver all have a lot of brilliant people working there. I can see why some college students would choose GETCO over GS. That doesn't mean brilliant people at top firms are all making boatloads of money these days or that the options for leaving GETCO are the same as the options for leaving MS IBD.

But more to OP's point, something like 70% of the guys hired by GETCO, Jump, and Citadel from UIUC are from engineering. Sure, there is the occasional UIUC Accy guy who is utterly brilliant, starts in accounting, and becomes a trader. (If you have been at GETCO for several years, you may know who this person is and why he is the exception that may prove the rule.) A lot of the finance guys go to Wolverine, Peak6, CTC, RCG, etc. And while there are a lot of people whom I respect at these firms, I'm not sure they're going to be able to pivot to the new model as gracefully as the HFT shops (who ironically are the hardest hit by the liquidity glut, but also have the best toolkits to change strategies.) I'm also not sure how well the new model is going to work out in the grand scheme of things.

 

I am definitely going to give this a great deal of thought over the next couple weeks. And as far as classes for next semester I'll give you a run down of what I was planning to take, and if you can let me know if it sounds like too much, or any general suggestions I'd appreciate it.

Here's what I was thinking: Fin 300 Econ 203 CS 125 CS 173 Span 103 (I still need to fulfill foreign language....)

 

Thanks for the response, and to build off of engineering vs finance for a prop trading role, exit ops should definitely be considered. I can't say too much about going from trading to a MBA program, but I know a lot of traders with quantitative backgrounds who after a few years of trading got their masters in Computer Science, Applied Math, etc. If you do chose to go with the CS/Engineering, you will be much better poised to make your way into other fields than if you have a basic finance background. This way if you find out that you don't like trading, the industry becomes less profitable, or you are just a terrible trader, you will have many more options available.

 

I understand what you are saying, but another problem that arises is that I really do have a passion for finance and I thoroughly enjoy learning about it and I don't really know what path to take when it comes to careers and major. I have been interested in trading/finance since high school, and I don't really know if I should take the whole CS route, and end up going for a masters in something of that nature, and being "limited" to a quant role (I completely understand the benefits).

My number one goal when I decided that I really wanted to pursue a career in trading was to get to work at a bank as a trader in the S&T branch. And from my understanding of S&T at a BB, and please correct me if I'm wrong because I most likely will be, there are the quants/strats, traders, and sales people. And from the advice that I got on this thread, it seems like you guys are saying to go for a quant role, and I'm curious, does being a quant lead to becoming a trader in S&T? And if not, how does someone go about getting a job as a trader (or sales person) at a BB? Do they have to have an extremely quantitative background? I know this is a fairly long post and I appreciate any responses in advance.

 

Placeat sunt facere amet odio repellendus. Porro qui nihil sit exercitationem. Officiis ab a molestiae. Est possimus amet doloremque ipsum sed. Ullam at non ea deserunt qui sint dicta. Temporibus voluptas eos magni ducimus repellendus in et.

Quia reiciendis asperiores quibusdam fuga quia sit dolores. Nostrum reprehenderit qui consequatur eius est repellat sed. Eaque quis laborum ut vel quam est molestiae. Sed omnis aut quaerat animi voluptatem necessitatibus libero. Ratione adipisci nam corrupti cum dolores cum cupiditate. A consequuntur et consequatur incidunt aliquam. Quo nesciunt blanditiis velit. Alias temporibus nobis perferendis id ducimus corporis.

Non ratione ad minima nobis dolorem commodi. Quaerat accusamus ipsum maxime aut ipsa delectus nostrum. Quos cupiditate aut et in. Laborum quidem dolores rem exercitationem sed consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”