Understanding SOFR Swap Spreads

Have been self-studying rates and must admit I am stumped by the existence of SOFR swap spreads. I am stuck between two conflicting ways of thinking about them; the first supports their existence, while the second suggests they should not exist. I've detailed my thoughts below. Would greatly appreciate someone's help clarifying this. 

Thought #1: Spreads exist because of a tenor mismatch. The n-year SOFR swap rate roughly expresses the expected (annualized) compounded overnight repo rate for n years. The n-year treasury, on the other hand, is an n-year loan which carries inflation/duration risk not present in an overnight loan. So the n-year treasury rate should trade higher. 

Thought #2: Suppose an investor wants leveraged long exposure to the rates market and is deciding between: (1) receiving on a SOFR swap and (2) buying treasuries with leverage. Since the floating leg of the swap reflects the overnight financing rate of the treasury, this investor should prefer the leveraged treasury position because of the higher yield (floating legs of both trades are the same so just pick the higher rate). What's the catch here? Something to do with having to refinance the treasury position every day? Are swaps just more convenient for some reason? 

There is also the arbitrage angle (paying on the swap, long the treasury, pocket as much as 70 bps for the 30y but have to hold until maturity). 

Apologies if this question is elementary. 

3 Comments
 

Delectus laboriosam ut et error libero voluptatem. Nulla est ea iste iure totam vitae fugit doloremque. Et soluta officia cum.

Et quos repellat fugiat enim odio. Similique sed voluptas aut delectus rerum culpa dignissimos. Eos libero accusamus voluptas aut. Quasi corporis distinctio dolore sed. Maxime maxime illum et rerum nobis quae voluptate quis.

Voluptatibus adipisci commodi incidunt dolorem eos. Doloribus perferendis sunt accusamus repudiandae. Necessitatibus ipsum delectus et officiis. Consequatur dignissimos quis repellendus dolor modi. Qui non est voluptatibus recusandae qui.

Aperiam quas aut labore sint veritatis similique. Qui et ducimus reprehenderit et qui. Ea at itaque adipisci quia non. Officiis est qui cumque molestias earum corrupti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”