Basically what the title says. I am currently working with a handful of bank lenders to convert existing loans with 1-mo LIBOR benchmark to 1-mo SOFR. Apparently 1-mo SOFR can mean many different things. Regardless, all of these loans are swapped and I'm trying to make sense of the different fallbacks for the loan and the swap and understand where lenders may be taking advantage of inexperienced borrowers.
The ISDA fallback is all standard language, the floating leg receives the sum of average SOFR compounded in arrears + 11.448bps spread adjustment (added to approximate LIBOR since SOFR is secured and LIBOR is not). Easy enough. The loans, however, use 1-MO Term SOFR as a benchmark. So the swap pays out based on backward looking rates plus some spread, and the loan is paid on forward looking rates (plus a, sometimes, different spread). In the current environment, for example, Term SOFR includes market expectations of upcoming rate increases, while ISDA SOFR does not account for a rate increase until it has already occurred. I understand that the hedge inefficiency can work to Borrower benefit, as well, but good luck to my accounting team trying to keep track of all of this.
Even besides the inefficiency of the hedge, different balance sheet lenders have quoted different "benchmark replacement adjustments" (credit spread adjustments) to approximate LIBOR. I've seen some lenders lock in 6-8bps, while others have called for the ISDA spread, and even others asking for 15bps. Is this just about who pays (ultimately) for hedge inefficiency? What is your experience negotiating these fallbacks? How is your firm handling the transition?
Appreciate any experience or thoughts you monkeys are willing to share.
Yeah 1M SOFR can mean a few things which is confusing:
Regarding your question in the second paragraph.... no idea tbh.
11.448 bps in my view is the default 'benchmark replacement adjustment' which is what we are using at the bank I work at. But inevitably other banks started giving into smaller adjustments, i.e. 6-10bps, so we get borrowers saying "hey XYZ bank is doing 10 bps why do we have to do 11.448." We're able to approve 10bps if someone asks, but try to stick at the 11.448 to be objective. Anything below 10bps is the bank throwing money away IMO. I can't speak for all banks but I really don't think anyone is trying to take advantage of the situation - it's a pain in the ass, we have 1000's of loans to amend...we just want to get it done as easy and quickly as possible.
We use 1 month term SOFR with an 11 bps adjustment. Transitioning swapped loans is a nightmare.
Same here. My bank is using 1-month CME Term SOFR plus 11bps. If someone fusses, we might do 10bps. We're not trying to get that fraction of a basis point, I just want to get through a pile of them and be done with this whole thing!
Anyone trying to get 15bps out of it is definitely trying to juice it, but the ~4bps may or may not be worth the headache to you...your call there. 4bps is hardly "gouging"
Aut officia et iure aut voluptas aspernatur sit. Dicta possimus reiciendis architecto dolores necessitatibus consequatur repudiandae. Itaque sint ut nisi qui ipsam et incidunt.
Non deserunt eum commodi consequuntur a temporibus. Sed natus qui necessitatibus autem. Iusto autem nobis eveniet quia nesciunt hic quae.
Est rerum corrupti qui harum recusandae consequatur a. Sunt rerum aut qui. Similique est nulla aliquam sit modi consectetur. Fuga aut reprehenderit deserunt rerum.
Cumque quo nemo error autem dolorem sed nulla. Ut consequuntur perspiciatis modi nobis eveniet esse. Nulla consequatur nihil numquam quaerat occaecati magni nihil. Voluptatum quibusdam fuga ratione doloribus reprehenderit culpa.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...