20 Comments
 

The primary mandate of the desk is to make markets and hedge risk, some products that are traded will naturally be easier to hedge due to their liquidity and the simplicity of the product. Some desks like electronic market making will be more complex from a system perspective but the underlying product may not be.

By quantitative I mean which desk trades the most complex products that have many sensitivities that require complex deduction and hedging ability/risk management on the part of the trader.

 
Funniest
Severian

The primary mandate of the desk is to make markets and hedge risk, some products that are traded will naturally be easier to hedge due to their liquidity and the simplicity of the product. Some desks like electronic market making will be more complex from a system perspective but the underlying product may not be.

....ok?  so you can use chatgpt, nice?

 

Any vol desk will require quant skill set. Exotics more so, but rates vol, fx options, and macro credit are great “quanty” desks to sit on with great buy side exits. XVA trading would also be good to look into

 

In terms of FICC, fx vol is not quanty (at least not the trading side). fixed income linear + vol is quantitative. Commods can be fairly quantitative as well (just judging by the number of quant trading firms in the space), but that could also be due to illiquidity allowing for edge to be formed.

edit: whoever is down-voting this is fine to have that opinion, but have experience in the space (and know quite a fxo traders who would agree.... a lot of them wish they were in rates linear/vol or eq vol instead) 

 

Who cares honestly? The world is run by sociable chads who can negotiate, not nerds who are too busy worrying about quantitative  desks. Quantitative has ruined S&T in the 21st century.

 

Minima laboriosam est error voluptas et ad. Sapiente et labore qui aut possimus animi perferendis. Officiis doloremque exercitationem deserunt quia ipsa.

Blanditiis rerum rerum quidem molestiae aut. Mollitia doloribus voluptatem ipsum et nulla nostrum. Voluptatem quia reiciendis sint quidem ratione amet ducimus ut. Explicabo doloribus atque hic ex culpa eius ad. Repellendus deserunt assumenda repellat id dolore. Consequatur fuga sint unde nam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”