Best Path to VC / Growth from Strat Fin or Corp Dev?

I have 2Y of tech banking and 2 YRs PE & 1 year of strat fin under my belt. I would love the option to explore VC or growth later on but right now it's not attainable. 

My next move is either to:

a) Strat fin at well known Data labeling AI company (handful you know) -> not sure if any M&A but thinking more strat fin vs. M&A

b) Strat fin + Corp dev at lesser known pre-IPO software company (~35% growth) but very acquisitive 

I'm leaning more towards b given the corp dev angle of still doing deals & still an investor hat on. However, a is more well known and the finance org / work is more AI forward and may be more applicable to AI investments in VC/ growth.

Would love your take on this. 



 

9 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your decision should align with your long-term goal of breaking into VC or growth investing. Here's a breakdown of your options:

Option A: Strat Fin at a Well-Known AI Company

  • Pros:
    • The brand name and AI focus could be highly attractive to VC firms, especially those investing in cutting-edge AI and tech startups.
    • Exposure to AI-forward finance work may give you a unique edge in understanding AI-driven business models, which is increasingly valuable in VC.
    • A well-known company can enhance your resume and open doors to networking opportunities.
  • Cons:
    • Limited exposure to M&A or deal-making, which are critical skills for VC and growth roles.
    • The role may lean more operational, which could make it harder to position yourself as an investor.

Option B: Strat Fin + Corp Dev at a Pre-IPO Software Company

  • Pros:
    • The combination of strategic finance and corporate development provides a mix of operational and deal-making experience, which is highly relevant for VC and growth roles.
    • Working on M&A deals keeps your "investor hat" on, which aligns well with the skills VCs value.
    • Pre-IPO experience at a growing company (~35% growth) can demonstrate your ability to work in high-growth environments, a key focus for growth equity and VC firms.
  • Cons:
    • The company is lesser-known, which might not carry the same brand weight as the AI company.
    • While acquisitive, the deals may not be as high-profile or complex as those at larger firms.

Recommendation:

If your primary goal is to break into VC or growth investing, Option B seems like the better choice. The corporate development angle ensures you maintain deal-making experience, which is critical for transitioning into VC. Additionally, the pre-IPO environment and exposure to acquisitions will help you build a narrative around understanding growth-stage companies and scaling businesses—skills that are directly transferable to VC and growth equity.

However, if you have a strong interest in AI and believe that the AI-forward work at the well-known company (Option A) aligns with your long-term investment focus, it could also be a compelling choice. In that case, you would need to actively network and position yourself as an AI-focused investor to bridge the gap to VC.

Ultimately, the decision depends on whether you prioritize deal-making experience (Option B) or brand name and AI exposure (Option A).

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/venture-capital/corporate-venture-capital-vs-independent-venture-capital-firms?customgpt=1, Corporate Strategy vs Corporate Development, Private Equity vs. Venture Capital in 2018, Q&A: Corp Dev > Strategic Finance > VC

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Heavily based on my experience of being a "one man VC". 

I think the best path is to choose something that gives you deep exposure to very specific technical, operational, and experiential problems in a few specific domains.

That's how you really build a network is to be around people solving similar and adjacent problems. 

To quote some famous people like Roelof Botha, VC is not an asset class.

When in doubt, use more peanut butter
 
Most Helpful

To be blunt, I think you're getting further away from your goal, not closer. Let's say you'll spend at least a year in this job, so 6+ YOE when you look to move. That puts you at Senior Associate / VP level, which is often when all your peers are also looking to make moves. So you're competing with people who have more relevant recent experience than you, for a role where your biggest comparative weakness (i.e. volume of relevant execution reps) is the most important factor. Look around these boards -- the midlevel lateral market has been a bloodbath at all stages for a few years now. 

The best advice I could give, which is better suited for early-stage VC, is to become enmeshed in a local technology community. Meet founders, see dealflow, network with investors, make intros, etc. But if you're taking that path it doesn't really matter what your day job is. 

 

Thank you. Appreciate the helpful honesty. The issue is right now I'm time constrained at my current job (i.e. PE Portco - on contract until Feb) + jobs postings are fewer. I've also tried my hand at recruiting for growth in last year but struck out at a few firms I think due to a) limited deal reps b) weird narrative of going to PE PortCo (from my PE firm) and wanting to go back to investing. I'm really trying to reset right now & optimize for the future. 

a) Given deals / reps is the factor, I think you're probably recommending me take option B then?
b) I'm also open to coming in as an associate / entry level - not sure if age is a factor for hiring though?

c) yea, seems like the overall message for more early stage roles is to start acting like a VC - networking to get to know all the founders / investors. 

do you view going back into tech banking (SW sponsor coverage - what I started out doing) as a viable route or that just shows regression?

 

I don't think either of the options you listed are very good. Rare to see people move back from corp dev due to perception that 1) you've checked out and are optimizing for lifestyle, 2) you're just an order-taker who doesn't need to be as thoughtful about industries. Internal finance functions don't really get any respect in either the institutional investing world, or at startups / scaleups for that matter. 

I'd take banking over that, but you need to be leaning in harder for true buyside seats. Waiting for job postings has never worked for anyone... get out there and network!

 

Quia voluptatem dolorem rerum laudantium excepturi est facilis rerum. Eos nihil dignissimos illo facilis. Et fugit et repellat quam. Voluptas vero qui voluptatibus excepturi.

Ad ut quia eos atque corporis nisi nam. Sit consequatur quis vitae et. Ducimus voluptatem hic labore ut. Quaerat nesciunt esse molestias omnis et debitis quidem.

In voluptatum qui minima vel eos voluptatem. Minus eveniet vel blanditiis magni esse. Aut id magni eos. Et adipisci dolorem nisi debitis consequuntur eius omnis laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”