Joining New Growth Fund of Mid Tier VC Out of Undergrad

Basically, what the title says. Debating the merits of joining a large, brand-name fund out of undergrad or joining a new growth arm of a well known mid tier VC (mid single digits AUM). I would be part of the founding team who are all very impressive, and I am very entrepreneurial by nature. I am currently recruiting and interviewing at Tier 2 growth equity shops (think Silversmith / JMI / Lead Edge) and was an SA at a Tier 2 firm as well. Still no offers on the table yet though. Curious what you guys think.

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key points to consider when deciding between joining a large, brand-name fund or a new growth arm of a well-known mid-tier VC out of undergrad:

Pros of Joining a New Growth Arm of a Mid-Tier VC:

  1. Entrepreneurial Experience:

    • Being part of the founding team can provide significant entrepreneurial experience.
    • Opportunity to shape the direction and strategy of the new growth arm.
  2. Impressive Team:

    • Working with a highly impressive team can offer valuable mentorship and networking opportunities.
  3. Career Growth:

    • Potential for rapid career advancement if the fund performs well.
    • Possibility of moving up to Principal/Partner level by late 20s/early 30s if the fund is successful.
  4. Skill Development:

    • Hands-on experience in deal-making and fund operations.
    • Opportunity to develop a broad skill set that can be valuable in future roles.

Cons of Joining a New Growth Arm of a Mid-Tier VC:

  1. Risk Factor:

    • Higher risk due to the unestablished nature of the new growth arm.
    • Uncertainty about the fund's long-term viability and success.
  2. Competitive Segment:

    • Early-stage VC is highly competitive, making it challenging to differentiate yourself.
    • Success may depend on luck and the ability to find a standout startup.
  3. Capital and Runway:

    • Ensure the fund has enough capital to operate for several years.
    • Verify the fund's runway and ability to place the right bets on the right companies.

Additional Considerations:

  • Diligence on the Fund:

    • Conduct thorough due diligence on the fund's returns, reputation, and the role you'll be given.
    • Vet the firm carefully, including reference checks on the partners and understanding the vision for the fund.
  • Brand Name vs. Experience:

    • A strong brand name on your resume can be an asset, but the experience and skills gained at a smaller, entrepreneurial fund can also be highly valuable.
  • Personal Preference:

    • Consider your personal preference for the type of work and environment you thrive in.
    • If you are highly entrepreneurial, the new growth arm may be a better fit.

Conclusion:

Ultimately, the decision depends on your risk tolerance, career goals, and personal preferences. If you value entrepreneurial experience and are comfortable with the associated risks, joining the new growth arm could be a rewarding opportunity. However, if you prefer the stability and brand recognition of a larger fund, continuing to pursue opportunities at Tier 2 growth equity shops may be the better path.

Best of luck with your decision!

Sources: Is VC out of undergrad a good idea?, Q&A: Joined a top Hedge Fund out of undergrad, Leaving Megafund for Lower Middle Market - Am I Crazy?, Why Growth Equity vs Buyout?, Q&A: 1st year VC analyst (~750M AUM)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Voluptas distinctio accusamus quod mollitia. Molestias eveniet aspernatur et pariatur dolorem qui.

Qui fuga sed rerum. Est commodi dolore rerum. Voluptas quas non ut id repudiandae et ipsam.

Velit voluptatem unde temporibus labore et. Dicta et ipsa optio dolores qui repellat. Dolor id occaecati delectus dolore quam. Voluptate nobis voluptatum voluptate et rerum beatae sed. Nemo at consequatur quasi ratione consequatur fugiat.

Doloribus commodi illum aut illum eaque in. Unde qui explicabo ea voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”