Venture Capital Prestige Tier List
Tier IDK - A16Z, NEA, General Catalyst, Lightspeed - cash rich giants, hard to rank accurately and depends on partner
Tier 0 - Sequoia, Benchmark
- Best brands in venture
Tier 0.5 - Thrive, Founders Fund, USV, Greenoaks
- Newer elite firms (Thrive, Greenoaks) with upper Tier 1 VCs (FF, USV)
Tier 1 - Index, Kleiner Perkins, Accel, Greylock, Khosla, Menlo, Bessemer
- Historic Legacy Silicon Valley VC firms - Standard Tier 1 VCs
Tier 2 - 8VC, Coatue, IVP, CRV, Redpoint, Lux, Ribbit, First Round, Bain Capital Ventures, Spark, Norwest, Battery
- Strong tier 1.5 - 2 VC firms, the argument could be made for a couple to be in the tier 1 list
Would move 8vc up a tier
what is the path to getting a job at one of the funds in tier 0.5 or tier 1? there doesnt seem to be much clarity online regarding this. obviously very hard but curious if there is a path
I work in the growth team at a multistage VC and can provide some context.
All of the firms (with the exception of Accel/BVP) in Tier 0.5 & 1 run very lean. The paths in can range anywhere from consulting, to later stage private / growth investing, to startup experience, to banking, to big tech experience, etc. I know these funds pretty well and have friends across most of the places on your list. As a general catch all, I would say:
Usually prefers former investors / consultants: Thrive, Greenoaks, Sequoia, Index, Menlo, BVP
Usually prefer industry experience: Founders Fund, USV, Khosla, KP
No preference: Accel, Greylock
Obviously there are exceptions to the above, but it is generally accurate from a hiring perspective. What you have to understand is that top tier venture is an exceptionally small industry and breaking in is extremely difficult, especially at the associate / junior level.
I think a more accurate list in 2025 would look like:
A+: Sequoia / Sutter Hill / Founders Fund / Thrive / Kleiner Perkins / Index / Greenoaks
A: Benchmark / Greylock / Accel / a16z (certain teams) / Menlo / Redpoint / USV
A-: NEA / Khosla / Spark / SignalFire / FirstMark / Lux / General Catalyst / First Round
B+: 8VC / Bessemer / LSVP / DST / Norwest / Battery / Emergence / Scale / Ribbit / CRV etc
B: BCV / Coatue / crossovers that do opportunistic A-D investing
Obviously a lot of nuance in the list above is missing, as some are sector specialists, have specific strengths, etc, but this is broadly correct.
What’s your methodology here, pure prestige? If based on returns, Benchmark is surely A+. USV as well. They had one of the most successful funds in history.
Are tier 1 vc firms more prestigious than MF PE firms and tiger cub hedge funds?
Prestigious 😂😂
Yes but not as prestigious as Cantor Fitzgerald
There are a lot fewer seats in T1 VC, its a lot harder to get in. Prestigious is a 22 YO's view of looking at the world but probably yeah lol
Where do firms like Dragoneer, ICONIQ, etc. fall?
Venture and growth are pretty different. ICONIQ will dip earlier into series B or even A but that’s not their bread and butter. They’re primarily a venture growth firm and I’d consider that different than just pure venture. Dragoneer is even more different than these firms, focusing really on just publics, structured deals, growth buyout, and late stage (series D+) growth from as far as I can tell.
Honestly these firms are all pretty opaque so I’d do your research by talking to people but if we’re talking pure venture I don’t think either of these really play there. That being said these are highly respected firms with good returns it’s just not “venture capital” really so if you’re angling for that for your next role they might not be for u
? Drangoneer is not opaque at all. There are good very long podcasts with one of the cofounders?
how about addition?
Bump
I think thrive is handly t0 at this point.
Siphoning Russian Ruble Tier 0 - 8VC
Would a job at say a "legacy" T1 VC that takes associates, like a Greylock, Kleiner Perkins, Menlo, Accel type firm be a better path to high net worth than a traditional buyout PE path? Wondering about long term compensation at these places.
I don't think it's a path to a higher net worth if the comparison is staying at VC fund vs staying at MF PE fund. Both are hard to advance and may require lateralling around. However, the VC path is higher beta, i.e. you have the opportunity to hear about and join much faster growth companies at critical junctures (look at all the VCs that joined OpenAI in 2023 / 2024), which could result in some phenomenal outcomes at a much earlier age than PE. However, if you're looking for highest $ of comp per year and building wealth that way, I still think PE (at good funds) is the better option.
If accounting for hours worked per week (40-60 in VC and 80-90 in PE) and overall quality of life, the balance tilts more in favor of VC.
The only "prestige" that matters is their 2021 vintage performance
Interesting breakdown! Makes sense as a general framework, but a lot depends on the sector focus and partner reputation.
Even Tier 1.5–2 firms can punch above their weight in certain areas, and A16Z or NEA’s impact varies by partner. Portfolio quality and deal flow matter just as much as tier rankings.
Real answer is whatever VC generates best returns for their LPs and is able to actually make impact by helping change the world.
If their's Tier 0, it's probably great angel investors no one's ever heard of.
Qui dolore voluptatem quis facere et molestias. Culpa voluptatem ad commodi omnis voluptas fugit quisquam. Laborum necessitatibus aut ullam sit facere. Adipisci aliquam quo similique iste in enim minima. Doloribus doloremque est repudiandae fugiat.
Temporibus eaque ut exercitationem ut voluptas architecto. Hic velit rem et molestiae rem natus. Pariatur natus modi quia quia temporibus quasi aperiam consequatur. Sunt quaerat et doloremque impedit nihil ut. Et enim quis corporis odit quibusdam velit magnam. Ut odio pariatur in temporibus et soluta doloremque.
Temporibus distinctio voluptatibus autem qui ipsa et nulla eos. Sed maxime aspernatur ullam eaque et ex fuga. Aut perspiciatis et et placeat quis assumenda atque. Repellendus mollitia recusandae totam nemo aut et. Aut sequi et non et dolor vel omnis.
Ullam debitis et eveniet reprehenderit. Ut perferendis ab sunt. Quae ab aut et est non pariatur. Quis nulla et ducimus ullam. Dicta ducimus voluptate ab enim est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Illo nesciunt provident nemo saepe et. Tempora dolores ab quibusdam corporis vero libero et. Nam necessitatibus excepturi et est vero. Repellat ea animi cupiditate id.
Quia consequatur optio fugit voluptatem consequatur ipsam molestiae. Assumenda eum quis nam quia modi suscipit.