accretive/dilutive merger Cash deal not stock swap
i get the accretive/dilutive when it is dealing with a stock swap and you issue new shares to see if new EPS is higher or lower.
my question is what if it is an all cash acquisition. would it always be accretive? wouldnt you use cash to retire the others shares and shares outstanding wouldnt change but earnings would go up?
any help is appreciated.
No it won't always be accretive because it depends on the new cost of debt that you are using to finance the "cash acquisition". Yes, in a stock transaction you are issuing shares which will dilute your EPS but there are other moving factors when taking into consideration a merger.
The main factors: mix of purchase price (stock to repurchase shares), new interest expense, new amortization expense (dependent on the purchase price - premium to target's equity value), and synergies.
So "generally" companies prefer to use cash for acquisitions as it does not dilute current shareholder's ownership and cost of debt is usually less than the cost of equity, but it doesn't necessarily mean that a cash acquisition is always accretive.
Now if you're saying that the company is not raising new debt to finance the acquisition then that will make the transaction more accretive but if you're paying a high purchase price for a company with little net income (high growth potential), the transaction could still be "net dilutive".
Hope that helps and doesn't make things more confusing.
not necessarily, since you usually build in an opportunity cost to the cash deployed.
and to follow up with what bigal mentioned, if this 'cash' transaction is financed through debt, there definitely are interest expenses every year to factor in to your final EPS.
i meant if you had the excess cash on hand. of course through debt would be different and i guess you would use an LBO type modeling pro forma
Yes, if using "in-house" cash, it will be accretive if the target net income is greater than new amortization charges (new goodwill & intangible assets from acquisition).
what exactly are amortization charges? i know there is goodwill on the balance sheet from paying a premium for a company. are you saying this is depreciated over time as an expense (noncash charge)
would free cash flows always be better off in the future starting with higher earnings if it was excess cash because you add back any noncash charges.
I think he meant to say impairment
Let's not forget the forgone interest you lose by spending cash in this deal. If the earnings increase represents a smaller amount of what you could have made by putting your cash into money market funds or other relatively safe investments than your merger will be dilutive.
yeah of course that makes sense.
but can someone go into a bit of depth on amortization charges? i know there is goodwill on the balance sheet from paying a premium for a company. are you saying this is depreciated over time as an expense (noncash charge)
would free cash flows always be better off in the future starting with higher earnings if it was excess cash because you add back any noncash charges.
Isn't there still goodwill amortization related to IRS tax rules. So would there be a deferred tax account somewhere?
So by accounting rules, goodwill cannot be amortized. Every year you can do an impairment test to see if it needs to be written down (can't be written up). In terms of an acquisition, goodwill will be the excess purchase price over the fair market value of the company's net assets. This goodwill will have no future amortization expense.
However, if I understand correctly, a purchase can allow you to assign a value to an intangible item that may not have necessarily have been there before. Under accounting rules, a company cannot develop an intangible "in-house", but if in the purchase (say a company is buying Coca-Cola) they can assign a monetary value to such an intangible as the firm's logo.
By doing so it creates a new intangible that was not present on Coke's balance sheet. Going forward, the acquiring company will have to amortize this intangible, which will cause amortization expense to increase and net income to decrease...which can cause EPS to dilute.
here's the calculation: (simplified for ease of use, there's more mumbo jumbo with financing fees and asset-writeups, etc)
purchase price less: target's book value of equity plus: target existing goodwill & intangibles = Excess Purchase Price (i.e. new goodwill + intangible assets)
Goodwill is not amortized but instead tested for impairments, where a write-down will be announced to reduce the value accordingly. Intangible assets, on the other hand, is amortized (assets that definite lives, patents, software, etc.).
So certain portions of the Excess Purchase Price is allocated to new goodwill vs. new intangible assets (80% to 20%, again for ease of use). So new amortization is just the portion of new intangible assets divided by the amortization years. Yes, non-cash charges like depreciation.
There is new amortization charges to account for the assets acquired that have definite lives, which makes deals more dilutive because there's additional charges for asset write-downs.
Hopefully that makes sense.
Remember that goodwill is no longer amortized as per FASB 141/142, instead there is the impairment test as cited above. However, identifiable intangibles (patents, etc) must be amortized and are tax deductible...
Mechanics aside, be sure you can take a step back and understand how a cash acquisition can be EPS accretive but value dilutive.
Transaction expenses relating to raising debt can be capitalized and are amortized over the life of the loan (I think) but this may change according to FASB 141R. Maybe someone else knows more about FASB 141R than I do but this was my interpretation of it.
Debt financing fees still remain the same: it is capitalized and amortized over life of loan. However, the transaction costs (IB fees, lawyers, communications, etc.) cannot be capitalized as it was before (when it was considered as part of the purchase price and therefore included in the goodwill calculation)...
Pink Money - any chance you could provide some further insight into what you mean by "value dilutive"? I understand the cash being EPS accretive....
The most basic example of "value dilution" is your EPS goes up, but the company valuation goes down due to P/E multiple contraction. There are several factors that can lead to multiple contraction, but a big driver is the dilution of your returns. Even if the acquisition is accretive to earnings, buying a company with a lower ROE profile will reduce your "Intrinsic P/E" and (more often than not) dilute the total value of the company.
A voluptatem repudiandae expedita tenetur. Culpa inventore sed rerum et cum. Est quia et non nesciunt. Qui saepe quidem sapiente maxime. Placeat quibusdam architecto eaque voluptatibus. Et et ut necessitatibus hic reprehenderit.
Reprehenderit eius nemo officiis ratione doloribus exercitationem. Recusandae amet quibusdam nobis vero nam eligendi sit. Neque nostrum exercitationem aliquid et ut quae. Ea sapiente non commodi dolorum autem quaerat.
Aspernatur enim ut quia possimus quae dolor rerum. Est et sed repudiandae. Saepe placeat facilis at corrupti. Nisi et adipisci omnis repellat enim est. Consequatur unde et ullam non. Sit quia ab aliquid ut fugit. Est sint et voluptatem esse.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...