Can I go humanities (no econ) --> MBA -> PhD in Econ?
Hi friends,
I did my undergrad at Harvard in Women's Studies. I am currently working in consulting at MBB and hope to attend Stanford's GSB in two years.
I would like to work a few years after that, and then return to school for my PhD in Econ, if possible. Does anyone know if this is a possibility, considering that I took only intro econ as an undergrad?
SBs to solid answers, thanks!
lol, you don't have the math level required for a phd econ program
OP what is anti derivative of e^y^k in terms of y where k is some constant
yeah blastoise is right, you need a serious math background for a phd in econ. It would be good to have taken intermediate micro, and macro and a course in econometrics. Linear Algebra would be the bare minimum you need to enter a phd program. Real analysis is one class that they really want you to have before applying. topology, and mathematical statistics/probability would make you better prepared. And you will need a high GRE score(close to 800 quantitative) to be accepted with funding to a decent program.
Why the fuck do you want to get a PhD in Econ?
Since you want a PhD in econ, how did you not at least take 1010a/b and math 21a/b?
OP is trolling?
Didn't think about doing the PhD until after undergrad. I'm smart and could take any of the pre-reqs before applying.
Will the MBA curriculum not help prepare someone at all for the Econ PhD?
MBA is almost zero Math. Econ PhD requires high level of Math, specially calculus (PDE for Micro) and Statistics (for Econometrics). There are research areas of Econ such as Industrial Organization, Labor Economics, Experimental Economics (Psychology part of Game Theory) which require very little Math and are easy to do. Unfortunately, before you get to the research, you still need to do the PhD courses and pass the comps in Micro, Macro, Econometrics, and one subject area. This is all heavy-duty Math. If you want PhD, think Finance and specially Behavioral Finance. Tak to the professors in the MBA program about it. It will be easy for you to get admission and also get a faculty position at a top B-school. I am not going to explain why because a lot of people on this forum will get angry at me.
ok seriously guys, OP claims to have done womens studies at harvard, this is clearly trolololing.
lol @ women's studies...
also in case your not trolling OP(which is les than 1% IMHO).
You did women studies.
If you had any intellectual or mathematical inclination in you whatsoever you would have quit that subject 3 months in and stabbed your eyeballs with rusty nails to eradicate such utter bullshit from your retina.
Seeing that you did not, you are incredibly dumb and definetly cannot do anywhere near enough math to do an econ phd.
/thread
99.9% sure you're trolling, but what the hell, I'll bite.
Just based of very simple prerequisites you can't just "do" the prereqs for an econ PhD. Let me put it this way, we'll just assume you would be starting in calc1 (considering it's womens studies I bet lower). You cannot take Calc1,2,3 in the same semester, that alone is three semesters minimum, and that is just the foundational classes that MIGHT give you a chance to get in. After that you would have to take an upper level statistics, Differential Equations, Linear Algebra, and real analysis (which often has its own pre-reqs). Assuming you have the cerebral capacity to handle that much math, and I'll just assume you do, you are looking at a solid 2 years working just on prereqs to meet the bare minimum required to get into, and do well in (more importantly obviously) a PhD program. Also, an MBA will do little to nothing at helping you get into a good program, if anything they will question what the hell you're collecting degrees for. If this is something you truly want to pursue than by all means, more power to you, but you are taking the entirely wrong approach to it. Also, with that little teeny bit of econ coursework you actually have little to no idea what Economics actually is. If you are truly interested, i would suggest reading these books to decide if Economics is something you really want to pursue at a high academic level.
Capitalism and Freedom- Milton Friedman The Worldly Philosophers- Robert Heilbroner Peddling Prosperity- Paul Krugman The Armchair Economist- Steven Landsburg Eat the Rich- P.J O'Rourke A Random Walk Down Wall Street- Burton Malkiel Freakonomics- Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner (Just for fun) Reinventing the Bazaar- John McMillan
This list gives you a little taste of what Economics at an academic and practical level actually is. I would sincerely suggest picking up a couple of these before wasting years of your life on something that (there is probably a good chance) you won't actually like that much anyways.
Thanks for all your input, everyone.
I did indeed do Women's Studies, my focus being Queer Studies (LGBT-studies / history / social theory). In high school I was a national qualifying mathlete, bridge-builder, engineering geek with a perfect on my SAT math, so to the naysayers who suggest I couldn't cut a more quant-y major, well, fuck you. I decided on Queer Studies because I wanted a radical department to give me a lens through which to best critique the world. I wanted to be a journalist. Then I tried journalism, and hated it.
Now that I'm out of the academy and into the real world, I'm sort of regretting my decision not to study engineering, computer science, or especially Econ, because it's with these tools that people are really changing the world.
Oh my Gosh I hated Capitalism and Freedom, I enjoy Paul Krugman's articles in the NYTimes, Freakanomics was fun, and Eat the Rich as well. I shall check out the others, thanks!
In addition to his list I would read "The Logic of LIfe" by Tim Harford and "Naked Economics" by Charles Wheelan. If you read both of these books(which shouldn't take you more than two or three days) you will have a better idea of what economics is and whether or not it is interesting to you.
Here is my 2 cents on this issue:
First of all, there really is no "easy" route in economics, as far as math goes. In fact, I would argue that Industrial Org, and labor economics as being some of the more math-oriented research areas. At the same time, I havent really dealt with experimental economics. Perhaps I just went to a weird school...
Second, OP, have you thought about just going to a masters program? There are a few masters in applied economics (MAE) programs out there that require only 2 semesters (sometimes even just 1) of math, which includes through calc 2 and linear algebra only. Given this, and your background as being a harvard grad (despite the womens studies...) you might be able to get into some half-rate MAE program and then transfer to a PhD program once you are getting the hang of econ. Just an idea..
Some sort of graduate degree in Math -> Econ PhD makes a shit ton more sense.
A graduate degree in math or statistics is great preparation for an econ phd, but the problem is that it will have similar prerequisites to the econ PhD ie real analysis, linear algebra
.
Update with info from the non internetz world.
After doing an MBA, I could definitely apply to and get accepted into PhD programs in Econ. One needs great recs, test scores, and proposed topic of study, of course. Probably even more so than someone who came from a pure Econ background (say, in UG). However, the pre-reqs y'all discussed above are pre-reqs to finish the program, not to get in. One could complete this coursework in the first two years.
This coming from a PhD student friend of mine.
Cheers.
Why you will fail is quite simple. The theories and applications at the PhD level are far deeper than anything you will read in any book you will find at Barnes & Noble or Borders(RIP), and you will be spending such a disproportionate amount of your time just trying to figure out the math you won't be spending any time learning the economics. Here is a piece of advice I would seriously sleep on. If you are truly dedicate, and hell-bent on getting a PhD in Economics, than so be it, more power to you and your ambitions. However getting an MBA first and diving right in is foolish to the point that very intelligent, accomplished people on these boards are giving you real life eye-rolls. The correct path to a PhD would be to go back, and get, if not a second bachelors, than at least a substantial amount of Mathematics under your belt, than applying to the PhD program where you will actually succeed, for no other reason than now you will be approaching it with the appropriate tools to do so.
Please go for the PhD. And please maintain a blog. I can't wait to read about your nervous breakdown.
All jokes aside, you will never get into a good econ PhD program (unless you get a second undergrad). Outside top 50 maybe. But then, why would you do a PhD at a school outside the top 50 (or top 20 for that matter)? You won't get a tenure track position anywhere.
OP, there is a lot of ass-hattery in this thread, but everyone here is speaking the truth. Unless you eat, shit, and sleep advanced mathematics, an econ phd will bend you over. At best an mba is a completely unrelated degree. Why bother with it if you're ultimate goal is an econ phd? You'd be wasting your time. Sharpen up your math skills at a local university and get into an masters program like Duke's or the econometrics one at LSE. Only then should you start thinking phd.
My economics professor told me that by the time someone finishes an economics PhD, they've done enough math to qualify for a math major. He also said that more people from math/science/engineering attempt economics PhDs than actual economics/business/commerce kids.
Where the fuck is your math major, OP? Unlike "Women's Studies" or "Political Science" or whatever, finance (along with engineering, medicine, computer science etc.) is a non-bullshit field, meaning the "lens through which to critique the world" you gained through your "Queer Studies" doesn't count for shit.
Also, keep in mind that all of highschool = bullshit and it's ridiculously easy to be a "mathlete" or get a 4.0 GPA simply by doing around 2 hours of work outside of school per day.
My honest suggestion? Go for an MBA at a top 20 school. You don't need more. You honestly don't need a PhD in econ, but hey...don't let any of us dissuade you! (By the way, econ PhDs aren't changing the world, only a select inner circle)
Holy shit, this girl is majoring in women studies, and gets a job at MBB, but I'm an Econ/Math double major at a target and I can't land any interviews with MBB because of my shitty GPA.
I'm telling my children to major in Women's studies.
Okay, I'm a dude. I didn't major in Women's Studies, I was being facetious; it was Anthropology with a focus on queer studies and globalization. It was at Harvard / Yale / Princeton. You can't get an interview at MBB because you've picked a typical route. You can be the very best of the typical, or you can stand out other ways.
I had a decent GPA in Anthropology, I speak a sexy foreign language, and I was selected for a very prestigious international research scholarship post graduation. I'm a published journalist, produced a short film, saved a man's life, am a first generation college student, am really tall and attractive (this totally matters, unfortunately), interview extremely well, studied hard for and absolutely crushed my case interviews, and am exceedingly personable.
This shit isn't easy. I'm a really fucking hard worker and have the balls to do what I want and then present the narrative in a way that makes sense. An anthropology major in MBB? Yeah, I did that.
I also left MBB because, guys, we can do better.
if you want a phd in econ then a MBA is not the best route nor will it be useful for your post doctoral career. You should do a master abroad at somewhere like LSE or somewhere in the states where there's a research component to the master program. Most of your professors at business school will dismiss you because you are a MBA student and frankly you will not have the tools to assist them with research and get good recommendations. (getting an A in corporate accounting or w/e will do nothing for your chances at phd admission). You need to strengthen your math background first and foremost. Regardless I wish you luck cause your goal is noble.
(Assuming not a troll.) OK, this is Greg Mankiw, the Chairman of the Economics department on the math backgrounds of aspiring Econ PhDs:
"A student who wants to pursue a career in policy-related economics is advised to go to the best graduate school he or she can get into. The best graduate schools will expect to see a lot of math on your undergraduate transcript, so you need to take it. But will you use a lot of differential equations and real analysis once you land that dream job in a policy organization? No, you won't.
That raises the question: Why do we academics want students that have taken a lot of math? There are several reasons:
Every economist needs to have a solid foundation in the basics of economic theory and econometrics, even if you are not going to be either a theorist or an econometrician. You cannot get this solid foundation without understanding the language of mathematics that these fields use.
Occasionally, you will need math in your job. In particular, even as a policy economist, you need to be able to read the academic literature to figure out what research ideas have policy relevance. That literature uses a lot of math, so you will need to be equipped with mathematical tools to read it intelligently.
Math is good training for the mind. It makes you a more rigorous thinker.
Your math courses are one long IQ test. We use math courses to figure out who is really smart.
Economics graduate programs are more oriented to training students for academic research than for policy jobs. Although many econ PhDs go on to policy work, all of us teaching in graduate programs are, by definition, academics. Some academics take a few years off to experience the policy world, as I did not long ago, but many academics have no idea what that world is like. When we enter the classroom, we teach what we know. (I am not claiming this is optimal, just reality.) So math plays a larger role in graduate classes than it does in many jobs that PhD economists hold.
Is it possible that admissions committees for econ PhD programs are excessively fond of mathematics on student transcripts? Perhaps. That is something I might argue with my colleagues about if I were ever put on the admissions committee. But a student cannot change that. The fact is, if you are thinking about a PhD program in economics, you are advised to take math courses until it hurts. "
He suggests taking (http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/05/which-math-courses.html)
Calculus Linear Algebra Multivariable Calculus Real Analysis Probability Theory Mathematical Statistics Game Theory Differential Equations
Like, you basically need an undergrad in Math to get into reputable PhD programs. An actual Econ undergrad won't get you in, regardless of how great your GPA is. A great GPA in Women's Studies doesn't tell the admission committee anything about your ability to do legitimately difficult quantitative work. I'd apply to a Masters at LSE or something and take a shitload of math if you're serious about this.
Either a troll or an extremely narcissistic guy
OP is a troll.
I know this because I am a troll and this is something I'd write to rustle some jimmies.
I was dying when he/she said womens studies @ harvard ---> MBB
No one on this planet who proclaims himself to be a math genius in high school would be in his right mind doing women's studies in his college, unless he is from Mars. Anyway, good job in trolling !
I nominate this thread for WSO Hall of Fame.
haha
Definitely need masters level in math or econ to be considered for PhD in econ.
Guys math importance is overinflated. Of course you need math to be competitive, but for students coming from Harvard etc the math is less a prereq. And once you get to math camp the math can actually be learned from scratch(as I've felt it could)...A masters is also a good stepping stone if you have no math. And for the record many, many people did an MBA prior to an Econ PhD. I'd do management PhD with an MBA though.
Aut accusamus ipsa culpa itaque. Id exercitationem consequatur amet sit quia voluptatem voluptas. Officia omnis molestiae iste blanditiis. A quas sed quia rerum cupiditate laboriosam. A quae praesentium occaecati. Animi ad nostrum id fuga ex ut provident.
Vitae qui illo aut ut et quis. Eveniet officiis ratione numquam nihil explicabo esse qui.
Facere et omnis enim totam. Corrupti nesciunt autem commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Aut voluptates deleniti perferendis dolor numquam saepe et. Explicabo fuga quo voluptatem quae dolorem. Omnis exercitationem autem non quia distinctio tenetur atque. Hic nulla eaque reiciendis vero. Enim aut eum iste modi.
Rerum ut ut blanditiis ratione quia vero quis. Sit consectetur inventore doloribus tempore est veniam. Sit unde rerum voluptas repellendus veritatis veniam natus. Consequuntur rerum voluptatem in provident. Qui unde molestiae explicabo voluptatum.
Alias praesentium consequatur alias perferendis adipisci blanditiis. Similique reiciendis aut autem vitae pariatur sint dolores.