So I'm confused by those who decide to get random worthless designations. I just saw a comment on a coworker's linkedin post (he's going for an Oxford Ph.D. btw, and lists nothing) from somebody who is a QKA(R), CRPS(R), and CHSA(R). Who puts this sort of junk after their name? I'm tempted to put BFD after my name after seeing that, and I have real letters.
Trending Content
| +89 | Zoomers are doing life wrong | 28 | 1d | |
| +70 | GF doesn’t care about her looks | 45 | 6h | |
| +52 | How to develop a thick skin? | 22 | 5d | |
| +39 | Insurance as High Finance? | 10 | 1d | |
| +34 | 400k/year in HVAC sales? | 26 | 36m | |
| +32 | Would you rather live alone in an outer borough or with roommates in Manhattan? | 23 | 21h | |
| +31 | Framed Photo of CEO on desk. | 16 | 1d | |
| +30 | Affair with my Associate… In Desperate Need for Advice | 21 | 4s | |
| +24 | BO -> ??? | 14 | 4d | |
| +22 | When do you plan to buy your first house and how much do you expect to spend? | 24 | 11h |
Career Resources
...
yeah and CAIA - some interesting information in the material it seems, but do the letters really have any value?
I clicked into the guy's profile. He lists being an eagle scout too. Dude, I ditched that on my resume after 23. I know I'm going to get some monkeyshit for this, but the CAIA is actually a decent second rate degree. I know one ETF talking head that had problems with it. (Not me, I've got my Charter) It's also below the grade 1B designations like the CFP.
Sorry had to give you some MS. I've seen Eagle Scout used even on company executive bios.
I agree that it seems stupid. However, I've had excellent work experiences with former Eagle Scouts. Seriously, not one bad experience with anyone that proudly listed Eagle Scout on their resume or background.
Not sure about the CAIA - it's very well-known in its niche and the people I've seen with the title are very accomplished professionals. However I would say inferior to the CFA, and even that has questionable value the moment you step out of a securities field, so maybe it does suck.
If you're in finance, the CFA is always kosher. CAIA, FRM, CPA, JD, CFP are well regarded and OK if you're operating in a niche where it is relevant. Everything else is alphabet soup.
If you have multiple, I think more than two after your name is a try hard move, even if it's from that list. I'd put them all in my bio though.
The junky certs are only OK if you're young and trying to break into an industry niche - it won't get you into Goldman, but it could perk the interest of a small finance shop that's focused around that area.
As a CFA Charterholder, I refuse to weigh in on the degree.
PWM says CFA is good.
Username Certainly checks out.
I'd add PMP with a caveat: that you work in the technology industry or consult for technology companies.
Zero. At the university I teach at, there is not a alternative investment course to take. That designation would help those who are gunning for the alternative space rather than make another DCF model
It's pretty bad in the IT world, they have an insane amount of "Certifications" that they think will help them get to that next level.
I have seen some fantastic ones where people have BA, BS, BSN, MBA, PHD, all from for profit colleges.
One funny one even had PLLC (Professional LLC) after her name.
“BA” lmao
This is why Elon is getting rid of titles
Like CFA
Edit: Damn, boys, that shit was a joke...
Edited, with Apologies: Jokes don't always transfer well to text, CRE.
Yeah but let's be real, a lot of asset managers abuse the fuck out of those titles to attract employees. "PM" is a back office type of role at many places. I know so-called PMs who "manage" 20b+ who barely crack 200k a year, because their decision making isn't central to the strategy. Sure they're managing cash drag or turnover or concentration or whatever.
But let's not pretend that even remotely the same job as an active PM who's paid for alpha. Different job, similar name. Just like the Secretary of State doesn't have a similar role to the secretary who's job it is to wear tight shirts and process travel receipts.
you tryna catch these hands, bruh?
This is how you learn what I learned in another thread: CFA's are touchy about the value of the designation. Like even joking about it is their version of a Muhammad cartoon.
You should put badass after your name, bc you're so badass.
WalMartShopper You're the "BigFuckingDeal" Congrats, put it on your business card. May I recommend staying at Walmart?
Thank you for finally saying something about this.. +1
The acronym that I think looks weird after one's name is MBA. Designations in general look good on a business card or a resume, especially if they are relevant to your profession. I worked really hard to become a CFA charterholder. I use the designation after my name because some people I interact with will be familiar with it. CAIA is for more of a niche area. If you work in alts, it makes a lot sense to get the designation.
Agree with you on the MBA part. While I think putting PhD or MD after your name is OK, seeing people who put MBA after just turns me off.
I like people who list MBA after their names. There's nothing wrong with the designation itself, unless it comes from a really bad school, but listing it on your business card, or even better, in your email signature, gives me advance notice of the sort of person I have a high likelihood of dealing with.
Might be an inferiority complex of sorts. I've seen people put CA and CPA after their name, conversely I've seen those with a PhD from a top-tier institution who don't even put 'Dr' anywhere in their profile - let alone their display name.
I know a doctor who refuses to be addressed as "Dr." He says it's dumb. I don't think it's a coincidence that he's also the top brain surgeon in his city. Meanwhile every average Joe doctor I know milks that title any chance they get.
Point being: mediocre professionals need designations to separate themselves from those who can't claim the designation. Truly accomplished people avoid designations to separate themselves from those who need them.
Sounds like your Doctor friend is modest, which is nice and a good quality, but has nothing to do with people getting a CFA to advance their career or expand their knowledge.
-guy who didn't study finance in college and got a CFA after which has opened a ton of doors
Nisi atque illo vitae et consequatur deserunt. Accusamus quia magnam ducimus voluptate. Quisquam sint aspernatur ducimus dolorem illum earum. Ut non quidem accusantium quaerat qui aut. Tenetur eveniet reiciendis modi aut nesciunt provident cum pariatur. Et optio iste soluta numquam accusantium dolorem et. Et totam eveniet modi officia cumque vitae.
Pariatur voluptatibus dignissimos qui non ut neque fuga. Ea quo suscipit eum dolores non eius. Minima est molestiae eveniet odit minus odit reprehenderit. Ipsam id assumenda sequi dignissimos ipsum aut delectus.
Quia ab numquam voluptatum amet suscipit. Veritatis sed quaerat consectetur numquam cumque laborum ipsam. At perspiciatis sint ut sapiente culpa laudantium est. Omnis quaerat tenetur consequatur totam alias architecto voluptas.
Molestias quasi voluptas officia odit eum. Labore voluptas neque quia id dignissimos architecto. Sint fugit ut laudantium optio est similique distinctio. Voluptas et iusto eius atque. Quos ratione distinctio consequuntur et est ut autem. Debitis dolores recusandae inventore excepturi tenetur similique.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ratione modi occaecati delectus corporis eligendi. Incidunt sint est ea. At vitae sint voluptas impedit deserunt.